by Joshua Cohen
The Vermont National Guard is administering Covid-19 vaccinations for youth in the 5 to 11 age group and booster clinics for the general adult population, according to a VNG press release.
Maj. Daniel Dykeman, commander of Joint Task Force Coyote, said the first pediatric vaccination clinic was held at the Vermont Guard Armory in Winooski on Nov. 16.
“We vaccinated approximately 150 in the 5-11 age group during the clinic,” Dykeman explained.
Efforts to provide a more relaxed environment for the kids included: “coloring books and toys as well as cartoons on the T.V, working with kids is different, and it went very smoothly.”
Dykeman said task force personnel prepared by completing the necessary training to administer pediatric vaccinations.
“We are ready to fully assist the State with their current vaccine needs, our path moving forward is for the teams to provide both booster and pediatric clinics which will be presented to make the younger children more comfortable to get the shot.”
Meanwhile, the number of booster vaccinations is doubling in some locations, according to Capt. Danielle Bean, the officer in charge of Task Force Coyote’s Team 3.
“Last Wednesday (Nov. 10) we provided approximately 150 booster vaccinations at a location in Burlington, today a week later (Nov. 17) at the same location we are on track to administer 300, we started at 8:00 a.m. and go until 2:00 p.m., so it is a constant flow of people now,” Bean said.
Bean attributes the increased numbers to the local availability of the boosters “in their community, and people feel the urgency to get the vaccine booster due to the Delta variant, they just want to protect their family and friends.”
Bean emphasized Task Force Coyote teams are holding clinics in every corner of the state.
“Administering the vaccine is only part of the work involved, there are many moving parts to provide a successful clinic, in my position I do a lot of work in between clinics ensuring all the logistics and planning are in place.”
Task Force Coyote consists of approximately 60 personnel from the Army and Air Guard. Dykeman said these include vaccinators, administration, and supply personnel.
To date, the Vermont National Guard has supported the overall state effort by administering over 70,000 vaccinations throughout Vermont.
Categories: Covid-19
We can only assume, then, that all vaccinations to minors are done with parental approval.
Except in the Brattleboro school…..
So now we have our US military being ordered to kill children. And they are doing it! Remember Nuremberg!
““In the U.S., no child has died from the vaccine, but over 600 have died from COVID,” Dr. Leana Wen, a professor of health policy and management at George Washington University, said in an email.”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/11/18/fact-check-covid-19-vaccines-not-linked-deaths-children/8584681002/
What source are you using to say your comment about killing children?
Christian,
I think I responded to you last time and you didn’t bother to respond. Let’s try again 🙂
There are 35 deaths listed in the Vaers system for anyone under 17 from the Covid vaccine. Go look for yourself: https://wonder.cdc.gov/
While you’re at it pull up life threatening issues at 264 cases. Then pull up permanent disability and you’ll see 123 events.
Now let’s think this out logically (without even discounting the number of deaths from covid to be only 5% of what they tell you – I explained this in the other post hope you’re keeping up) you’ll see that there were over half as many life threatening and permanent disabilities from the vaccine as there were from Covid. However once you factor in that all children have probably been exposed to Covid vs. only about 10% of children have been vaccinated which conversely would mean that only 10% of the injuries are reported.
At this point they are counting vaccine injuries as covid (it’s always been their plan) so you’ll see the covid case numbers go up when it’s really the vaccines.
I hope you can see the easily laid out information telling you what’s going on….
Also please note that in children (and this is well documented all you have to do is look) myocarditis is much more prevalent. Coincidentally (I’m being sarcastic here) Omicron now is listed as causing myocarditis in children at much higher rates. Astonishing that this would happen at the same time that we are now jabbing children who have near zero risk of dying from Covid or passing it on.
Seriously, all you have to do is look.
Brian,
I must have missed your reply in a previous post. I try to remember to click the “Notify me” but I must have forgotten that time. Hopefully we aren’t just repeating ourselves again here.
In response to the numbers you pulled from VAERS, I’ll just copy and paste the disclaimer that you had to agree to before being able to search this data:
“VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to VAERS. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind. ”
Please provide source as to why COVID deaths should be 5% of reported numbers.
Please provide source as to your comment about vaccine injuries being counted as COVID.
Here’s an article discussing myocarditis correlations – https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/16388?autologincheck=redirected
No child has died from the vax? They just started giving the vax to young children so you have no proof of such. However, yes indeed older vaxxed children have died! Nice try though.
Gracie,
You seem to be conflating two separate issues.
One is that there have been no current deaths caused by the vaccine in children. Here is my source – https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e1.htm. If additional data becomes available, then that statement will change.
Please share your source proving the opposite as you claim.
The second issue is that “They just started giving the vax to young children so you have no proof of such.”. Obviously the original quote and source I shared aren’t predicting the future, they are reporting on the past.
Please provide source as to why COVID deaths should be 5% of reported numbers:
It’s right in the fine print:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm
“Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The number of deaths that mention one or more of the conditions indicated is shown for all deaths involving COVID-19 and by age groups. For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death. For data on deaths involving COVID-19 by time-period, jurisdiction, and other health conditions,”
As for the Vaers data and the authenticity of it:
I would first just like to call to the irony of deploying an emergency ‘vaccine’ that could have serious consequences of a type that’s never been used before and then not having an accurate tracking mechanism.
It’s my understanding that each manufacturer is supposed to keep track of their own injuries and the rest of the US will use the vaers reporting system. If you can show me different I’d love to take a look at the real data.
Since it’s very obvious that a vaccine manufacturer is on the hook for a ton of money in regards to these, it’s absurd to think that they are going to track this accurately. Remember they want to wait 55 years to release the data…. https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/vaccine/fda-pfizer-vaccine-foia-55-years/507-a4a9b0b3-b184-4da9-a1fd-d3ec0a2d6616
If that doesn’t make you question things…
Now back to the vaers data. If you read this other document from the CDC you’ll find that they are actually going through and verifying the data for severe cases (which would include deaths).
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/pdf/VAERS-v2-SOP.pdf
Seriously how else would they track this?
As for the vaccine injuries being counted as covid.. just use your head.
PCR tests aren’t accurate.. they were never meant to be used as a diagnostic tool per the creator of the test Kerry Mullis. Furthermore they were calibrated on the flu and the common cold (story for another day). This allows the CDC to manipulate the numbers anyway they want. More testing equals more cases because it’s not accurate it’s throwing a lot more false flags (think asymptomatic which has been proven to be crap). Kerry Mullis literally said that if you turn up the cycles past 35 you just might find any DNA on the planet no matter what you put in it. Last I knew Vermont was running it at 42 times. Again the CDC guidance has wavered on this (which corresponded with an election cycle but again a story for another time) and apparently they do it 25 times now if you’re vaccinated allowing them to say the vaccinated have less cases.
Again, why would the omicron variant come out just as we’re starting to vaccinate children when we know that they have higher instances of myocarditis issues, and seeing an uptick in blood clots and heart issues in the hospitals nationwide and covid in its new variant all of a sudden causes more heart problems?
That doesn’t make you do a double take?
Getting to the point where you understand that the vaccine injuries and the case counts are correlated is a long conversation (some of which I’ve shown above). But it’s one you can get to a lot easier once you realize that there was no excess death in 2020. No excess death means no pandemic. However they’re trying to tell you that 700,000 people have died from this. How is that possible? Wouldn’t that mean that there be at least a couple hundred thousand excess deaths in 2020?
Maybe I’m just a skeptic but when they tell me to follow the science and I realize that they’re not even tracking cases, deaths, and vaccine injuries properly I have a hard time believing that they’re following science.
I’m reading the article you posted now…
Brian,
I did get this notification and appreciate your reply.
Thanks for the source. I still don’t see why you take COVID-19 deaths at 5% with that quote? That quote says that in over 5% of deaths COVID-19 was the only cause listed on a death certificate. That doesn’t mean COVID-19 wasn’t involved in the other 95% or so deaths, it just means more than one condition or cause was listed as well.
I think you are pointing out what I think is so crucial with that CDC VAERS document, which is that VAERS data is being utilized and analyzed to determine vaccine safety. However, this requires an actual process, not just logging into the VAERS website, searching for deaths, and then saying that COVID-19 caused X number of deaths shown (because this number wouldn’t be accurate).
While 55 years seems like a long time and alarming at first, the article you shared points out why it would take 55 years to process the complete number of documents requested. According to the article you shared, it is because the number of documents you requested is massive and staff are limited. That takes time. However, during those 55 years, you would see documents being released (“500 pages per month on a rolling basis”).
I would rather use my head to read the source you have. So if you have one showing vaccine injured are being tracked as COVID, please share.
Regarding PCR tests, you’ve said a lot. I can’t what you are attributing to Kerry Mullis as things actually said. Please provide sources. I will offer this fact-check regarding some of what you have claimed. For example – “Even if Mullis had voiced a similar statement before his death in 2019, this quote does not mean the PCR test is unable to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 – the virus that causes COVID-19 – rather that it cannot determine whether the individual tested is infectious.” (https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-pcr/fact-check-inventor-of-method-used-to-test-for-covid-19-didnt-say-it-cant-be-used-in-virus-detection-idUSKBN24420X).
Why do you think the omicron variant is coming out as we are vaccinating children? Correlation is not causation, if you have data showing a causation, please share.
CDC data shows there have been consistent excess deaths since data started in end of March – https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/16388?autologincheck=redirected
I just read this article briefly (and the CDC source it was based on).
I think it should suffice to say that after learning about the other data we’ve talked about being manipulated to create fear among the people that I have my suspicions on this data too.
I believe I understand why that is happening but I don’t have as much evidence to back them up so I will not attempt to debate them here with you as I have the others. I’m just not ready to share my thoughts on it yet.
I’m not sure for me it changes the equation anyhow. At the very least the unknown aspect of the long-term complications (birth rate will be one of these) should be enough to shy away from it.
Brian,
What data is being manipulated to cause fear?
Whenever you feel ready, feel free to share your thoughts as to what you think is happening.
How do you know birth rate will be a long-term complication of the vaccine?
Regarding long-term complications, I understand the concern. I would just like to share this – “Serious side effects that could cause a long-term health problem are extremely unlikely following any vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine monitoring has historically shown that side effects generally happen within six weeks of receiving a vaccine dose.” (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html#:~:text=Serious%20side%20effects%20that%20could,receiving%20a%20vaccine%20dose.).
Long-term complications from COVID-19 meta-study results here – https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95565-8
This is a long one, but I hope I answered most of your questions:
“Thanks for the source. I still don’t see why you take COVID-19 deaths at 5% with that quote? That quote says that in over 5% of deaths COVID-19 was the only cause listed on a death certificate. That doesn’t mean COVID-19 wasn’t involved in the other 95% or so deaths, it just means more than one condition or cause was listed as well.”
A few things:
They incentivized hospitals to mark down covid on the death certificates. They would get $17k or $19k per death certificate if there was not a ventilator in use and $32k if they used a ventilator. (Please don’t attempt to send me a fact check on this you can do your own research and find that they were making these payments through the medicare system)
They incentivized relatives to have the death certificates modified so that FEMA will pay $9k for burial. There were numerous reports of officials coaching people to change the certificates to add covid so that they would get the $9k. https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/services/funeral-expense-relief
They changed the way that they do death certificate reporting in March of 2020. Prior to this to put something on a death certificate it wasn’t an “assumed” illness it must be diagnosed. This alone inflated the numbers significantly because anyone with a cough or a fever is an “assumed” case especially with the incentives above.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/coronavirus/Alert-1-Guidance-for-Certifying-COVID-19-Deaths.pdf
So now you have covid listed on the death certificates of everyone that died with a cough or a fever… Which for people who are elderly or anyone dying with a disease is a near certainty. If you read the fine print you will find that the 700,000 figure includes anyone with covid listed on their death certificate. That’s how the numbers were inflated.
“CDC data shows there have been consistent excess deaths since data started in end of March – https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm”
So this is actually complicated because death reporting isn’t consistent across the US. This was much easier to do in January and even July of last year as much of the data has been obscured (go ahead try to find a reputable source that will show you deaths per year and include 2020. What you’ll find is that either they say they exclude covid deaths or they only have 2019 data. This is especially true for Vermont the last time I looked). When I researched this in January of last year the number of deaths in 2020 was only 25,000 more than the prior year. Which sounds like a lot but it really isn’t as the fluctuation from 2018 to 2019 was a difference of 50,000. I usually like to bring up “Where did the flu go?” at this point (285,000 deaths anually)… I also look through all of the people that I know and the number of deaths did not go through the roof in my life, and hadn’t until September of this year after most of VT was “vaccinated”.
When I look at the graph that you gave me it specifically says “Predicted number of deaths from all causes”. Why is it predicted, don’t they know? Every fine print says 2 – 8 weeks behind… “Provisional death counts are weighted to account for incomplete data.” – uh huh.
“I think you are pointing out what I think is so crucial with that CDC VAERS document, which is that VAERS data is being utilized and analyzed to determine vaccine safety. However, this requires an actual process, not just logging into the VAERS website, searching for deaths, and then saying that COVID-19 caused X number of deaths shown (because this number wouldn’t be accurate).”
I am pointing that out, however I also stated that I discounted those 5 deaths in VT because they were very old or had many underlying conditions not because I could say it was not from the vaccine just that they were close anyways so without an autopsy (which they aren’t doing many of) we wouldn’t know. Even 6 deaths in Vt is still very high for a vaccine. It’s unheard of with any other vaccine we have ever distributed. We can debate semantics but in the end the standard belief is that the VAERS data is only 1 – 10% of the actual issues encountered in the real world. So if that’s the case and the numbers are this high… how bad is it really?
This is here in Vermont at UVM showing that the reporting in VT isn’t happening:
https://vermontdailychronicle.com/2021/09/21/uvmmc-nurse-says-doctors-dismiss-possibility-of-vaccine-reaction/
Besides if you go back and read that document (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/pdf/VAERS-v2-SOP.pdf) it clearly states that all deaths have a “Clinical review by CDC* which includes review of VAERS form and available medical records by primary ISO staff, so it is being reviewed.
“I would rather use my head to read the source you have. So if you have one showing vaccine injured are being tracked as COVID, please share.”
Yeah the CDC has a PDF I can readily download to show that… lol I’m going to call it what it is an “Impossible ask”. Once you know that the PCR tests are not accurate it all starts falling apart and the virus can be blamed for anything.
“Regarding PCR tests, you’ve said a lot. I can’t what you are attributing to Kerry Mullis as things actually said. Please provide sources. I will offer this fact-check regarding some of what you have claimed. For example – “Even if Mullis had voiced a similar statement before his death in 2019, this quote does not mean the PCR test is unable to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 – the virus that causes COVID-19 – rather that it cannot determine whether the individual tested is infectious.” (https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-pcr/fact-check-inventor-of-method-used-to-test-for-covid-19-didnt-say-it-cant-be-used-in-virus-detection-idUSKBN24420X)“
This should explain it especially the guy at the end: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XIL7OP3w1U
I happen to like these videos of Kary as well because they start to explain what he was thinking and explains how Fauci is a farce and a small glimpse into what Fauci did with the AIDS virus:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ogPbJzqtZM
“The number of cases went up exponentially because the number of tests went up exponentially”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezjPgVwQP8E
“If you do it well you can find almost anything in anyone” – he’s talking about cycles here
There is a bunch more information in here if you would like to know more (including the above 35 and 40 cycles information):
https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=1661984
As for Vermont running it at 42 times that was part of the discovery on a court case in VT. I don’t immediately have the document available.
This document proves that the system was also detecting influenza:
https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
“CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses”
So they mean to say that the PCR test has never differentiated from the flu (because it was calibrated with it)? You don’t say that’s where the flu went, they were all covid cases.
“Why do you think the omicron variant is coming out as we are vaccinating children? Correlation is not causation, if you have data showing a causation, please share.”
Again another impossible ask…. How could I prove that? What data would you want me to share with you? What could prove that they did that on purpose other than lining up everything that has happened and how coincidental it is that they say that it’s more infectious to children and it causes more heart issues? How many coincidences of this “pandemic” need to happen before people wake up?
“While 55 years seems like a long time and alarming at first, the article you shared points out why it would take 55 years to process the complete number of documents requested. According to the article you shared, it is because the number of documents you requested is massive and staff are limited. That takes time. However, during those 55 years, you would see documents being released (“500 pages per month on a rolling basis”)”
I get that it takes time to do something like this but that’s still not acceptable as most of won’t even be around to see the outcome of this information, and over half of the workforce is attempted at being strong armed into taking a vaccine that could have dire consequences for us. In my opinion they were able to create 329,000 documents in only 2 years time but will take 55 years to disseminate it? It certainly takes me a lot longer to type a document than to read it….
They are slow playing it on purpose, just like the election.
“What data is being manipulated to cause fear?”
I’m not really sure why you are asking this it seems obvious to me but I’m covering a lot of ground here… Covid in general. Fear creates a mass psychosis and allows our rights to be taken away as well as dehumanizes us. Watch this to get a better idea of what is happening to us as a society right now: https://rumble.com/vo0dwu-mass-psychosis-how-an-entire-population-becomes-mentally-ill.html
“Regarding long-term complications, I understand the concern. I would just like to share this – “Serious side effects that could cause a long-term health problem are extremely unlikely following any vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine monitoring has historically shown that side effects generally happen within six weeks of receiving a vaccine dose.” (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html#:~:text=Serious%20side%20effects%20that%20could,receiving%20a%20vaccine%20dose.).
Long-term complications from COVID-19 meta-study results here – https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95565-8”
I’m not even going to go there with those. The bottom line is that it’s a new vaccine so the historical doesn’t apply here. It has a new delivery system that can do almost anything to your body (literally it can create proteins in any manner we wish and your whole body works from proteins). There is a reason Moderna (modified RNA) is called the operating system of life (their words not mine). They have not finished studies on it and it’s long been known that the animal trials were not a success when reinfected and most were cut off early from long term studies in animals (you’ll see plenty of fact checks on this one…).
“How do you know birth rate will be a long-term complication of the vaccine?”
For now, we will call it a hunch. The studies and information that I have found on this aren’t public and likely easily disputable so you can infer what you want from that. This will be another time I pray that I am wrong and will hate if I’m right.
“Whenever you feel ready, feel free to share your thoughts as to what you think is happening.”
Please take the time to watch Catherine Fitts. She used to be the Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Housing and is quite bright. It’s 40 mins but it explains what is happening and why:
https://rumble.com/vdi02h-the-great-reset-is-happening-now-with-catherine-austin-fitts.html
I think that will open your eyes a bit to the bigger picture.
The reason I know this is what’s happening is because there are several plans for this whole process on the internet from the Rockafeller organization (however they replaced the real plans late in July with a new document also called lockstep that isn’t the same at all), the World Economic Forum and it’s Great Reset, and Johns Hopkins university. There are conspiracy theorists going back to the 50’s who said this was going to happen. Fauci told Trump he was going to face a pandemic, how would he know?
Watch this: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XNRY9xEgkWgo/
Please put down the main stream media. There’s a reason that they are losing so much market share, people are realizing that they are lying to you…. These organizations are all owned by the same people perpetrating this on us and have been the main tool of disinformation. Those of us that have been researching this since it started mostly know that if there is a fact check for it and it says it’s false that we should dig deeper because they are nearly always lying.
I like this documentary by Glenn Beck as well but it’s long (turn it up to 1.5 times playback speed and know that I don’t agree with everything he says in this video but most of it): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91Ib5NjSZ-o
Whether you like him or not he also provides his documentation to back it up: https://www.theblaze.com/newsletters/crimes-or-cover-up
Dear Brian,
Took me a little to respond, our conversations sure are getting long on here.
I know you don’t want to hear fact checks, I’ll include them anyways as they summarize responses with a source/data.
You are correct about increased payments. However, you are missing data or any sort of report showing that increased payments actually led to misclassifications. If you don’t have any data or any sort of analysis supporting your hypothesis I don’t understand how you can claim and believe in it.
Changes in death certificate guidance – https://www.factcheck.org/2021/04/scicheck-flawed-study-fuels-erroneous-claims-about-covid-19-death-toll/
I think the excess data speaks for itself. The data is provisional and is updated as more accurate data comes along.
Here is an article discussing flu death decreases and where it went. Epidemiologists attribute the decrease to the same health measures taken by some during this current pandemic – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/flu-has-disappeared-worldwide-during-the-covid-pandemic1/
What do you mean that autopsies aren’t being done?
That interview with the nurse doesn’t prove anything. It shows what a single person thinks. Again, no analysis has been done. Mark it as something to note, and do the analysis (which is being done).
Thank you for sharing videos of Kary speaking. I still don’t see where he explicitly stated what you claimed he said.
When you make claims but then say you don’t have a source and don’t want to hear fact checks it seems like our conversation isn’t necessarily fair. For example, even after understanding the requirements for document releases, you still say they are “slow playing” it. I think this is where you and I differ. You have made claims/opinions without having evidence to back them up. I would urge you to pickup the mainstream media (as you call it) to balance out your news intake.
“you are missing data or any sort of report showing that increased payments actually led to misclassifications”
I found them a long time ago (here’s one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIDsKdeFOmQ), but my job of doing the research for you is done here. Think: Has there has ever been a time in history when someone could get rich but didn’t… Use your head.
“Changes in death certificate guidance – https://www.factcheck.org/2021/04/scicheck-flawed-study-fuels-erroneous-claims-about-covid-19-death-toll/”
Factcheck.org is a site that promotes misinformation…
From the article: “The CDC hasn’t altered how death certificates for COVID-19 are filled out”. The whole article is based upon that lie in which I have already proven to you is but a lie:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/coronavirus/Alert-1-Guidance-for-Certifying-COVID-19-Deaths.pdf
“I think the excess data speaks for itself. The data is provisional and is updated as more accurate data comes along.:
Again this was a “Predicted number of deaths” – What part of prediction don’t you understand?
Prediction: noun
1. a thing predicted; a forecast.
“a prediction that the Greeks would destroy the Persian empire”
2. the action of predicting something.
“the prediction of future behavior”
“Here is an article discussing flu death decreases and where it went. Epidemiologists attribute the decrease to the same health measures taken by some during this current pandemic – https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/flu-has-disappeared-worldwide-during-the-covid-pandemic1/”
Really? After showing you that the CDC admits that the PCR tests detect the flu you throw that out? Are you even real? Bueller?
That Scientific American article was written by a self-described creator of visual stories who also publishes things for the New York Times (https://www.katiepeek.com/). The article might as well have a sign over it saying it was written by the WHO and clearly states that “epidemiologists think” with no citations other than from the WHO. Now this one I understand. I always trusted this magazine until I found out who now owns it. Do your research.
“What do you mean that autopsies aren’t being done?”
I mean what I say. Very few autopsies are being done… Families have requested them only to have them refused or the body burned before they could. Again, PAY Attention.
“That interview with the nurse doesn’t prove anything. It shows what a single person thinks. Again, no analysis has been done. Mark it as something to note, and do the analysis (which is being done).”
That is you opinion, but I know it to be true with conversations I’ve had with others. The response I got from the health department on it was very telling… They are not reporting things properly and never have it’s just worse with this.
“Thank you for sharing videos of Kary speaking. I still don’t see where he explicitly stated what you claimed he said.”
Big surprise. NOT.
“When you make claims but then say you don’t have a source and don’t want to hear fact checks it seems like our conversation isn’t necessarily fair. I think this is where you and I differ. You have made claims/opinions without having evidence to back them up. “
This is obscene. First, of course I have my beliefs and instead of lying and telling you that I know, I am honest and explain that I don’t have a source for this one piece. Yet with all the sources I have provided to you, you focus on that. Fair would be if you looked up the data for yourself instead of having me debunk fact checkers and opinion pieces. I have provided you with authoritative links (not opinion pieces) yet you still refuse to believe it. Fact checkers are paid shills to misinform you of what is really happening, paid by the same people perpetrating this on the people of the world.
“For example, even after understanding the requirements for document releases, you still say they are “slow playing” it.”
It only took them 14 weeks to gather the data but 55 years to disseminate it? Come on. Really?
“I would urge you to pickup the mainstream media (as you call it) to balance out your news intake.”
You would urge me to poison my mind more with the very same people that are lying to you?
You think I don’t read what they write? What a J.O.K.E.!!! Have a good day sir. I hope someone else takes the time to read this and understand that they are being played. Heavily.
You need to take a class in critical thinking because the bats have left the belfry.
stop this. STOP THIS! Kids are NOT at risk from Covid. STOP THIS
When I received my booster shot on October 29th in Manchester, the Army & Air Force NG team handled the entire process in a very orderly and efficient manner. They were kind, thoughtful and knowledgeable in the way they conducted their entire approach to the assignment. As a retired, senior Air Force officer, I was very impressed with and grateful to the team for the manner in which they handled the commission.
I am sure that the Vermont Guard members that administered the “vaccine” to you were professional, efficient and compassionate. They are after all, Vermont Guard- an exemplary group of dedicated people.
The Guard can and should be used to administer the “Vaccine” to those adults that consent to it.
However the use of the Guard to “vaccinate” children is another matter entirely. You, as a retiree are in a higher risk group for complications from SARS-CoV-2. Data available from the CDC and VT Dept. of Health show very clearly that the risk to children of death is zero- and that most children are asymptomatic, or have minor symptoms. More data from the same sources show the “Vaccines” have risk- and cause injury and death. The risk/benefit of “vaccination” to a 10 year old is inverse to the risk/benefit of a 60 year old and older age groups receive even more alleged benefit from the “vaccine”.
As a retired senior Air Force officer, you know all about the bureaucracy doesn’t always get things right. You know too, that the Guard adds legitimacy to the quest for universal “vaccination”, including children- when the impacts of this “vaccine” are unknown. It has become difficult to separate fact from fiction in all issues Covid. Using the Guard in this manner might just be legitimizing a big wrong.That is the issue.
Critical thinking is a thing of the past, and I believe there’s a special place in hell for all of you that are pushing this poison on the Littles.
I’m not sure that the Vermont Guard needs this added to their list of accomplishments.
It is an action I certainly would not be bragging about, nor participate in.
Army Reserve Task Force Coyote and Operation Cold Steel – “The operation is designed to familiarize Soldiers on several different crew-served weapon systems and to increase Soldier lethality to produce units of action and combat-ready Soldiers. This training allows Soldiers to gain hands-on experience and knowledge that equips them to meet mission requirements.” Would this training include bio-weapons-digital warfare weapons? It is an unconventional war – perhaps we are seeing it from one perspective – yet, when it comes to the military….which side are they on?
Who are these vaccinators that are giving these shots? Are they nurses? Are they pharmacists? What qualifications do they have to be giving an experimental drug to the most vulnerable? Doesn’t the state of Vermont require only certain licensed personnel to give vaccinations in this state? Are parents involved?
Again they don’t care what individual rights they have trampled. And neither does our so called republican governor.
Mary