
By Guy Page
A bill to give property owners tax incentives to keep forestland undeveloped passed the Vermont House yesterday by a 99-40 vote.
According to an Ethan Allen Institute news coverage of the bill receiving preliminary approval Feb. 25, “The purpose of H.697 is to combat climate change by offering stronger tax incentives to keep Vermont’s forests undeveloped (free from logging and development). The goal is to increase ‘old growth forest’ from 1% to 9% of forested area in Vermont.”
“Since 1980 under Vermont’s Current Use program, Vermont landowners who farm or log plots of land could have that land taxed at a lower tax rate, rather than the higher rate for residential or commercial purposes.
“H.697 would allow Vermont landowners who own land with certain environmental attributes to join loggers and farmers in getting that lower tax rate under the Current Use program, if they manage that land with the goal of creating old-growth forest. These environmental attributes include:
“State-significant natural communities” (a group of interacting plants and animals, which can be ranked by importance)
Land containing “rare, threatened, and endangered species”
“Riparian areas” (areas close to rivers and steams)
“Forested wetlands” (forests growing in bodies of water)
“Vernal pools” (seasonal bodies of water without fish that nourish plants and animals).”
Here’s the roll call for yesterday’s vote:
Ancel of Calais Yea
Anthony of Barre City Yea
Arrison of Weathersfield Yea
Austin of Colchester Yea
Bartholomew of Hartland Yea
Beck of St. Johnsbury Yea
Birong of Vergennes Yea
Black of Essex Yea
Bluemle of Burlington Yea
Bongartz of Manchester Yea
Bos-Lun of Westminster Yea
Brady of Williston Yea
Briglin of Thetford Yea
Brown of Richmond Yea
Brownell of Pownal Yea
Brumsted of Shelburne Yea
Burke of Brattleboro Yea
Burrows of West Windsor Yea
Campbell of St. Johnsbury Yea
Christie of Hartford Yea
Cina of Burlington Yea
Coffey of Guilford Yea
Colburn of Burlington Yea
Conlon of Cornwall Yea
Copeland Hanzas of Bradford Yea
Corcoran of Bennington Yea
Cordes of Lincoln Yea
Dolan of Essex Yea
Dolan of Waitsfield Yea
Donnally of Hyde Park Yea
Durfee of Shaftsbury Yea
Elder of Starksboro Yea
Emmons of Springfield Yea
Gannon of Wilmington Yea
Garofano of Essex Yea
Goldman of Rockingham Yea
Grad of Moretown Yea
Harrison of Chittenden Yea
Hooper of Burlington Yea
Hooper of Montpelier Yea
Hooper of Randolph Yea
Houghton of Essex Yea
Howard of Rutland City Yea
James of Manchester Yea
Jessup of Middlesex Yea
Killacky of South Burlington Yea
Kimbell of Woodstock Yea
Kitzmiller of Montpelier Yea
Kornheiser of Brattleboro Yea
LaLonde of South Burlington Yea
Lanpher of Vergennes Yea
Lefebvre of Newark Yea
Lippert of Hinesburg Yea
Long of Newfane Yea
Masland of Thetford Yea
McCarthy of St. Albans City Yea
McCormack of Burlington Yea
McCullough of Williston Yea
Morris of Springfield Yea
Mrowicki of Putney Yea
Mulvaney-Stanak of Burlington Yea
Murphy of Fairfax Yea
Nicoll of Ludlow Yea
Nigro of Bennington Yea
Notte of Rutland City Yea
Noyes of Wolcott Yea
O’Brien of Tunbridge Yea
Ode of Burlington Yea
Pajala of Londonderry Yea
Partridge of Windham Yea
Patt of Worcester Yea
Pugh of South Burlington Yea
Rachelson of Burlington Yea
Rogers of Waterville Yea
Satcowitz of Randolph Yea
Scheu of Middlebury Yea
Shaw of Pittsford Yea
Sheldon of Middlebury Yea
Sibilia of Dover Yea
Sims of Craftsbury Yea
Small of Winooski Yea
Squirrell of Underhill Yea
Stebbins of Burlington Yea
Stevens of Waterbury Yea
Sullivan of Dorset Yea
Surprenant of Barnard Yea
Taylor of Colchester Yea
Till of Jericho Yea
Townsend of South Burlington Yea
Troiano of Stannard Yea
Vyhovsky of Essex Yea
Walz of Barre City Yea
Webb of Shelburne Yea
White of Bethel Yea
White of Hartford Yea
Whitman of Bennington Yea
Wood of Waterbury Yea
Yacovone of Morristown Yea
Yantachka of Charlotte Yea
Krowinski of Burlington Not Voting
Achey of Middletown Springs Nay
Brennan of Colchester Nay
Burditt of West Rutland Nay
Canfield of Fair Haven Nay
Cupoli of Rutland City Nay
Dickinson of St. Albans Town Nay
Donahue of Northfield Nay
Fagan of Rutland City Nay
Feltus of Lyndon Nay
Goslant of Northfield Nay
Graham of Williamstown Nay
Gregoire of Fairfield Nay
Hango of Berkshire Nay
Helm of Fair Haven Nay
Higley of Lowell Nay
Kascenska of Burke Nay
Labor of Morgan Nay
LaClair of Barre Town Nay
Laroche of Franklin Nay
Lefebvre of Orange Nay
Marcotte of Coventry Nay
Martel of Waterford Nay
Mattos of Milton Nay
McCoy of Poultney Nay
McFaun of Barre Town Nay
Morgan of Milton Nay
Morrissey of Bennington Nay
Norris of Sheldon Nay
Norris of Shoreham Nay
Page of Newport City Nay
Parsons of Newbury Nay
Pearl of Danville Nay
Peterson of Clarendon Nay
Rosenquist of Georgia Nay
Scheuermann of Stowe Nay
Smith of Derby Nay
Strong of Albany Nay
Toof of St. Albans Town Nay
Walker of Swanton Nay
Williams of Granby Nay
Bock of Chester Absent
Chase of Colchester Absent
Colston of Winooski Absent
Jerome of Brandon Absent
Leffler of Enosburgh Absent
Morgan of Milton Absent
Palasik of Milton Absent
Smith of New Haven Absent
Terenzini of Rutland Town Absent
Toleno of Brattleboro Absent
Categories: Legislation
If VT is anything like Maine than the forests are a treasure and should be saved. So much better than those hideous people plantations the union carpenters have been slapping together. Good for whomever all voted for saving the forests.
Look– I’m ALL FOR private property rights & development/usage BUT..Has ANYONE reading this ever SEEN an old growth forest? There’s about 10 acres of one on a buddy’s land in Westfield & it’s a treasure..Near the town of Cherry Grove in western Pa., in the Allegheny Nat.’l Rec. Area is “Hearts Content Scenic Area” set aside from cutting over 100 years ago..It is incredible to be there, no understory or brush, eastern hardwoods so big 2 people cannot reach around them, truly awesome as any medieval cathedral. We should save & allow more of these for whatever reason so generations to come can SEE what their euro ancestors saw when they migrated here. Trust me, I’m NO enviro-whacko but SOME land & forests MUST be saved & pristine, just that simple.
wait a minute………Land Use or Current Use already covers this………are we talking paying lumber companies to NOT cut up in NE kingdom??? cause as is now can cut and remove without penalty….change that