Commentary

Wilton: As long as Vermont’s ruling class maintains school monopoly, children will suffer

by Wendy Wilton

Vermont boasts the oldest school choice system in the country—and the simplest. Begun in 1869, Vermont’s school choice system provides that any Vermont school aged child who lives in a district without a government school can attend any accredited school in the world, and Vermont will pay tuition in an amount set by the Vermont Agency of Education. Except for Maine, which followed Vermont’s lead four years later in 1873, no other state allowed parents to choose their children’s school for more than a century.

Wendy Wilton

Many states today are following Vermont’s lead and moving toward greater school choice for families, especially after parents have had a firsthand look at public education during the recent pandemic. Ironically Vermont’s ruling class is considering dismantling our unique system of education in order to prevent a few tuition students from selecting religious schools.

Our ruling class objects to the United States Supreme Court’s recent ruling that when there is a government benefit such as Vermont’s tuitioning program, parents must be allowed to use that benefit to pay for religious schooling for their children. The Court reasoned that the First Amendment Free Exercise clause requires that such a benefit cannot be denied to parents who seek to exercise their religious liberty rights by sending their children to a religious school.

Missing from this discussion is any mention of Vermont’s kids and what’s best for them.

Children who are different are often bullied, ignored, or punished in government schools. A transgender middle school student was teased and bullied at his public school, and found refuge in a small independent school who treated him with respect and dignity. A wheel chair bound boy, who was considered a nuisance at his public school, blossomed at an independent school, where he was welcomed and treated like a full member of the community. A young girl with a speech delay was punished at her public school because she defended herself from a bully who teased her about her speech, and threatened to kill her dog. Because her parents cannot afford to pay for an independent school, she continues to suffer.

These are all true stories outlined in a lawsuit filed by parents who want the benefit of school choice for their children. Except for the lucky few who live in a school choice town, Vermont has become an educational monopoly. As with any monopoly, it has become rigid, doctrinaire, and bigoted as the objection to free exercise of religion in the tuition program demonstrates. Recently, students were punished by chanting “Let’s Go Brandon” at a high school game at Randolph Union High School, and in another school, a school cook was fired for writing “Let’s Go Brandon” on a school menu. Two years ago, a school principal was fired because she commented on the flying of a Black Lives Matter flag. Diversity of opinion is not allowed in Vermont government schools.

If the ruling class actually wanted diversity, it would support school choice, which gives individual families the opportunity to choose the education which best suits their children. But the ruling class does not want diversity, and it doesn’t trust parents to choose what is the best education for their children.

According to the Vermont Historical Society, during the 19th century, Vermont’s educational diversity resulted a system that was “active with change and alive with the spirit which makes education…one of the most vital of human experiences.” The system “reflected the conviction of a free and independent people, that education was a fundamental right; that the welfare of the individual student was their greatest obligation; that the purpose of the school was not to repress, examine or standardize youth . . . but to give him enlightenment, understanding and fellowship, to aid him in the development of his own personality and innate abilities…” Proceedings of the Vermont Historical Society, 1936, Vol IV, No. 3., at 118.

That spirit of diversity, of treating each child as an individual personality with talents that are celebrated and cultivated, should return to Vermont’s educational system. Let us again be the country’s leader in educational diversity—and not move to a total government monopoly which increasingly seeks to “standardize” children and serves, not the kids, but the ideology of the ruling class.

The author is a Milton resident and former state senator.

Categories: Commentary

6 replies »

  1. Bravo Wendy. It is entirely pro child and pro family for school choice to be available. And especially for those that do not have the means. What has happened to the liberal left that they work against poor families? And families that select religious schools often are not doing so because of religion. When it comes to catholic schools for example often the kid and their family are not practicing Catholics. They chose the school because of its superior education and safe environment.

  2. I am a product of twelve years of Catholic education; however, my parents did not depend on tax dollars to pay for it.

    I could agree with much of Ms. Wilton’s arguments if she would:

    1. Acknowledge that there already are public school choice options.

    2. Agree that any school receiving tax dollars cannot discriminate. It must have an open admission’s policy.

    3. Admit that she would support tax money going to an Islamic school provided the students had an option to not receive religious instruction.

    In closing, it would be appreciated if replies to this forum could avoid politicizing the issue with terms such as “liberal left” or “conservative right”.

    • John fair point to not politicize by using labels. In my forty years engaging in education reform, workforce development, including school choice, it’s been the left, Democratic Party that has opposed school choice. At the behest of the teachers unions. So this issue is very much political and very real children and families have been harmed by limitations to school choice. Families of lesser means are the most harmed, more affluent families can afford the private school tuition without any public support.

      This contests my experience growing up it was liberal democrats who championed the interests of the middle class and the poor. It just seems that has changed. And it’s a shame because for decades it had led to fair labor practices and other policies that pushed back on corporate interests that raised the standard of living for the middle and low income families.

    • John, name something that hasn’t been politicized. Lots of name calling and labels from the liberal left who taught the far right how to respond in kind.

  3. Every Parent needs to have a choice of education for their children…….especially now! I chose to send my boys to different schools for the education, I am not affiliated with any religion or political party; never have been. I paid and then moved to a “choice” town for that very reason……

Leave a Reply