Education

Williams: Opposing H634 means preserving opportunity for our children

by Rep. Terri L. Williams

A bill that is coming through my committee, the House Education Committee, is bill number H634.  It states the following:  This bill proposes to require school districts that close an existing elementary or high school to provide for the education of its students by designating three or fewer public elementary or high schools to serve as the public school or schools of the district.   I will NOT be supporting this bill as read.  My stance on this is that I will always support school choice.  As I continue to support public schools, I will also support the independent school opportunity.  One school/or school type does not fit all children.  Home schooling is a good example of that. 

When I was trekking through my school years, I went to the awesome public school at Concord.  It was the perfect fit for me.  I grew up in North Concord and went to Concord School from grades 1 to 12.  I knew everyone; we all knew each other.  We all studied together, we played sports together, we attended each other’s activities.  We were a family unit through all grades.   

     Rep. Terri Williams

When I wanted to advance in my business/bookkeeping studies, Concord didn’t offer enough.  I had completed all that Concord had to offer but I was hungry for more.  Concord School had an agreement with St. Johnsbury Academy, an independent school, that if the town of Concord was willing to pay tuition for students to attend their vocational program, we were welcome to attend.  Thank you, town of Concord for giving me this great opportunity.  I attended this program during my junior and senior years.  This extra educational opportunity gave me a solid foundation to become a factory supervisor, fast food manager, business owner.

I worked for the Concord School in the early 1990’s as the school secretary.  We not only continued to offer vocational opportunities to our students, but we also had another contract to help support our students.  Three schools, Concord, Danville, and St. Johnsbury Academy agreed to place up to three students from any of the schools in a school setting that better suited the student’s needs.  I remember and still stay in touch with some of the students that attended Concord from the other schools.  Being in a setting that works best for you can make all the difference in the world as to your success or failure. 

We need to preserve all options and opportunities for our rural communities and kids.  This bill would do just the opposite.  It would eliminate opportunities at a time when many rural communities are exploring the best path forward to serve our children.            

Some are concerned that independent schools discriminate.  The Vermont State Board of Education has done tremendous work to make sure this doesn’t happen.  The State Board has solid requirements in the 2200 series rules that address any concerns over discriminatory practices.  All approved independent schools must comply with the anti-discrimination laws in the admissions and operations process if they want to receive public tuition dollars.  It states that they cannot discriminate against protected classes or consider socioeconomic status.  They are required to comply with the VT Public Accommodations Act and the VT Fair Employment Practices Act.    Vermont also has Act 173, which requires independent schools that wish to receive public tuition to serve students with special needs if the school is determined to be an appropriate setting.  The Agency of Education is integrating procedures and processes in order to support schools to adapt and adopt the systemic changes necessary to respond to the act.  These rules and procedures are just beginning to take effect and it will take some time to implement.                   

Let’s talk a little about cost.  The highest budget costs per pupil in the state are in the districts who operate schools for grades K-12.  Those per pupil costs are, on average, about $5,000 per pupil more than non-operating districts and districts that operate elementary schools and tuition for secondary grade levels.  Furthermore, independent schools must use independent sources of revenue for their capital needs and are not eligible for state construction aid.  Self-funding their capital costs saves communities and the statewide education fund tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. This creates more capacity for use by public operating districts in the financing of their school bonds. 

Why shouldn’t communities be allowed to consider independent schools and broad school choice? Shouldn’t quality, cost, convenience, what’s best for children, and local control be the driving forces behind these decisions — not the legislature forcing families into more expensive, and less convenient situations that may not be best for students 


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Education, Legislation

9 replies »

  1. Couldn’t agree more. The people need to get this runaway horse (supermajority legislature) under control.

    • Ms. Williams: Then what is your opinion of H.405, as sponsored by Representatives Arthur Peterson, Carolyn Branagan, Allen “Penny” Demar, Mark Higley, Terri Williams, and Charles Wilson?

      H. 405 proposes to allow all Vermont students to attend the school of the student’s choice, public and independent, paid for by a School Choice Grant issued by the Agency of Education.

      This bill was proposed a year ago and has, apparently, been filed in the dustbin of the Education Committee archives. I’ve read the bill as introduced. It is extraordinary in its simplicity, and it will have an enormously positive effect on virtually every aspect of life in Vermont.

      “Why shouldn’t communities be allowed to consider independent schools and broad school choice?”

      Apparently, you all *are* considering this. But where is your vociferous support for H.405?

    • As you mentioned, I did sign onto this bill, and yes, I expect it will stay in the dustbin. Not my choice.

    • Not your choice? That’s it?

      If it were your personal business, and you hired someone to do a job that failed to be done, and the person you hired gave you a perfunctory explanation that the reason nothing was done ‘wasn’t their choice’, and that was it, what would you do?

      People’s lives and livelihoods are being ruined. And it’s ‘not your choice’?

      While I admit to being somewhat stunned by your remark, I can assure you, it’s not my choice either. But I’m going to renew my efforts to do something about it by continuing to explain, in as much detail as I can muster, to anyone who will listen, why H.405 is one of the most important pieces of legislation ever put forth by members of the legislature. So, if you or any of the other so-called ‘sponsors’ of H.405 happen to have a change in heart… let me know.

      “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Benjamin Franklin

  2. Problem:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDlDfI-Y7T4&list=PLVRO8Inu_-EVd1EmoBWCgzZ3a0o2w-dqr
    Solution:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmDfeVsO0cY

    Give the money directly to parents to spend on education, materials, and “Free lunches”. They can provide receipts at the end of the year. If they want to give that money right back to the public schools, that will be proof that the public schools are the best choice. The government only wants the best choice for “our children”, right?

    Public education is defunct in the age of the internet.

  3. Ms. Williams: as you support school choice, in my opinion, there really should be a choice. If a parent may not choose a school that does not adhere to the AOE’s guidelines, then I’m not sure what real choice parents you are giving parents. Also, why are you as legislators bowing to the guidelines of an agency where no member is elected by the public? I respect your opinion since someone actually voted for you to be in office. However, I have no use for an appointed group who literally controls all public education in Vermont. and is now trying to control private education with the consent of our legislature. Since there are only 3 branches of government mentioned in the Constitution, I do believe that the “laws” the AOE is forcing are unconstitutional as well.
    I agree that H634 is a bad idea, but frankly, there are sooo many bad ideas coming from our current legislature that I’m not sure where this falls on the bad-o-meter!

  4. Representative Williams, you are a true blessing for Vermont and the NEK. Thank you for always standing up for the people and seeing through the haze at the statehouse. You are a compassionate warrior and a shining light. Very gratefully
    Alison Despathy

    • Agreed! Actually, Allison is also a blessing. She writes with such clarity and depth of understanding! Terri really stands up to the Dem-Prog Groupthink in Montpelier.

  5. Please continue to fight for all legislation to promote and protect School Choice. If it is the only thing you do in your career, it will be enough.