WCAX | Vt. officials concerned with meeting climate target timeline |
NBC 5 | Green Mountain Power launching cost-effective solar to aid low-income Vermonters |
NBC 5 | A proposed bill could outlaw tobacco, cannabis products that use single use filters |
VT Digger | Burlington officials speak out against ballot initiative on police oversight |
WCAX | Farmers can earn money by improving conservation practices |
WCAX | Vt. braces for reduction in SNAP benefits, prepares for debate overBuy universal school meals |
NBC 5 | US government has received more than 350 new UFO reports |
VT Digger | Faced with a stubborn court backlog, the Legislature sees no easy solutions |
NBC 5 | Burlington city leaders roll out new public safety plan |
Seven Days | Progressive Contest for South District Council Seat Ends in Tie |
WCAX | VTrans takes feedback for Colchester ‘diverging diamond’ project |
VT Digger | Many second-home owners pay a lower tax rate than residents. Will the Legislature change that? |
Regarding the “Vt. braces for reduction in SNAP benefits, prepares for debate overBuy universal school meals”:
I am confused, VT is reducing benefits to those in “need” but is still buying breakfast and lunch for everyone regardless of need?
I’m suspicious of many of the ‘social benefit’ programs the state has initiated but school meals for all is not one of them. If we cannot feed our children, we are indeed a sorry excuse for a society. Need is irrelevant – many parents that don’t qualify for ‘need’ don’t have the knowledge or inclination to prepare healthy meals for their children to take to school.
only the government would think state should buy 2 meals for every student. it is not their money
The percentage of parents who don’t need the help is very high. Most kids can make their won lunch starting at about age 8.
It used to be that school was meant to prepare children for getting by in the real world. Now the real world includes free stuff for anyone who claims a need for it and freedom from shame, so you dont even have to make a claim for need now, because that might cause embarrassment. What can we expect next from Montpelier? Maybe a requirement for all employers to provide free breakfast and lunch for employees, since that is what they have become accustomed to? Who votes for these people?