|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Here’s what the numbers say.
by VDC Staff
Based on data analysis by The Mendoza Law Firm
Vermont is known for its rolling green hills, progressive politics, and tight-knit communities. But new data reveals a troubling reality hidden behind that reputation: when it comes to anti-Black hate crimes, no state in the country exposes its Black residents to more risk per capita than Vermont.
A Small Community, an Outsized Burden
Vermont’s Black population is small — roughly 7,316 residents on average over the past several years. That’s fewer people than fill many sports stadiums. Yet between 2021 and 2025, the state recorded an average of 17.6 anti-Black hate crimes per year, according to FBI hate crime data.
The result is a per-capita rate of 240.6 anti-Black hate crimes per 100,000 Black residents — the highest of any state in the country.
To put that in perspective: Oregon ranks second nationally at 121.0 incidents per 100,000 Black residents. That’s less than half Vermont’s rate — and Oregon has more than ten times as many Black residents. Vermont sits nearly 120 points above second place, a gap that reflects how dramatically its small community size amplifies the impact of each incident.
How Vermont Compares to the Rest of the Country
The ten states with the highest rates share one notable feature: relatively small Black populations, where even a handful of incidents per year produces an elevated per-capita figure.
| Rank | State | Avg. Annual Black Population | Avg. Annual Anti-Black Hate Crimes | Rate per 100,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vermont | 7,316 | 17.6 | 240.6 |
| 2 | Oregon | 82,453 | 99.8 | 121.0 |
| 3 | Wyoming | 5,129 | 5.4 | 105.3 |
| 4 | Idaho | 14,937 | 13.6 | 91.0 |
| 5 | Maine | 25,427 | 21.6 | 84.9 |
| 6 | New Hampshire | 20,338 | 12.2 | 60.0 |
| 7 | Montana | 5,058 | 2.8 | 55.4 |
| 8 | Hawaii | 27,320 | 15.0 | 54.9 |
| 9 | Washington | 311,435 | 138.4 | 44.4 |
| 10 | Utah | 39,489 | 15.4 | 39.0 |
Source: FBI Crime Data Explorer and Missouri Census Data Center
The contrast with states at the other end of the spectrum is even starker. Mississippi ranks last with just 0.9 incidents per 100,000 Black residents — meaning Vermont’s rate is more than 267 times higher. Louisiana and Georgia each sit at 1.7; Florida and Arkansas at 1.6. Even against 46th-ranked Louisiana, Vermont’s rate is nearly 239 points higher.
This is not simply a story of high absolute numbers. Vermont does not record hundreds of hate crimes each year. The story here is one of concentrated risk — what happens when a very small community is targeted repeatedly in a place where that community has little critical mass or political visibility.
The Year-by-Year Picture
Looking at individual years adds texture to the story:
| Year | Anti-Black Hate Crimes | Change from Prior Year |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 24 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | −5 |
| 2023 | 19 | 0 |
| 2024 | 9 | −10 |
| 2025 | 17 | +8 |
After peaking at 24 incidents in 2021, Vermont’s annual count dropped steadily — falling 63% to a low of 9 in 2024. That trend might have looked like progress. But 2025 brought the sharpest single-year increase in the five-year period, with eight additional incidents recorded over the prior year.
That rebound warrants attention. Given Vermont’s already high per-capita rate, even a modest increase in the raw number of incidents has an outsized statistical effect on the community’s exposure.
Why Per-Capita Rates Matter
It can be tempting to dismiss small-state figures as statistically insignificant — after all, we’re talking about 17 or 24 incidents in a year, not hundreds. But that framing misses the point.
For Vermont’s roughly 7,300 Black residents, 17 hate crimes in a year is not a small number. It means that in any given year, roughly 1 in every 430 Black Vermonters is directly targeted in a bias-motivated crime. In a small, close-knit community, that’s not a distant statistic — it’s a neighbor, a coworker, a family member.
Per-capita rates exist precisely to make these comparisons fair across populations of different sizes. When we use them, Vermont doesn’t just appear elevated — it stands alone.
About This Data
This analysis was produced by The Mendoza Law Firm, an immigration law practice focused on community advocacy and accessible legal support. The study examined anti-Black hate crime data from the FBI’s Crime Data Explorer and Black population estimates from the Missouri Census Data Center across all 50 states for the years 2021–2025. States were ranked by average annual hate crimes per 100,000 Black residents. The full research dataset is available here.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: News Analysis, Race and Division









On page 26 of the guidelines for reporting hate crimes, it is up to the discretion of “an officer to report to the ‘second level judgement officer/unit’. In smaller units this is usually a person specially trained in hate crime matters…”
So let’s say you have a single metropolitan area (Burlington) in a small-population state (VT), that has a police force controlled by a party with an agenda, and that unit is in charge of whether to determine a hate crime has been committed, against whom, and whether to report it to the database. Chicago and DC, for examples, have demonstrated reporting bias.
Other crimes that qualify as reportable include (but are not limited to): Assault, burglary, vandalism, drug offenses, welfare fraud, identity theft, money laundering, flight to avoid prosecution, murder, shoplifting and theft.
Obviously, there’s plenty of room for reporting bias.
What is an immigration law firm doing trolling for hate crime cases? Is the immigration case well drying up? Is Vermont a target rich environment, with plenty of NGO money available to press their “hate crime” cases?
Can we see a cross comparison between the percentage of crimes AGAINST persons of color and the percentage of crimes committed BY persons of color?
It’s more than a little aggravating to be branded as flaming racists, with double the rate of hate crimes per capita, on the basis of these crappy data sets.
Carpetbaggers.
The leftist/liberal/democrat agenda relies on a steady diet of racism and for them the demand always exceeds the supply, so be careful accepting any such statistics that get thrown around. It’s easy to make such accusations in one of the “whitest” states in the country, and one of the most liberal. It would be interesting to see what percentage of violent crimes are perpetrated by “Black” persons per capita to compare to other states, and crimes reported versus adjudicated could be quite different when we have our cadre of leftist prosecutors. When most of the journalists are also part of the liberal agenda, little details like ethnicity and immigration status go conveniently unreported in crime stories.
Granted a high rate but I’ll bet the black on black crime rate is significantly higher as it is in Ohio.