Roper: OF COURSE the rent is too high

and Legislature a big reason why

by Rob Roper

We know this is a general problem. The study by the National Low Income Housing Coalition and the Vermont Affordable Housing Coalition generates some specifics in that “Vermont’s full-time workers need to earn $23.68 an hour, or $49,258 annually, to afford a two-bedroom apartment at fair market rent,” and that number is higher in Chittenden/Franklin/Grand Isle Counties to the tune of $31.31 per hour.

You MUST pay the rent.

A headline in VT Digger declares “Vermont wages well behind cost of rent, national study details.” First question: did we really need a study to tell us that? When politicians run on the issue of “affordability” at the top of the list of unaffordable items is housing. When companies say they have a hard time recruiting workers to come to Vermont, the obstacle usually at the top of the list is a lack of affordable housing for the potential employee.

But, as Ronald Reagan warned, government is not the solution, government is the problem. Here’s how your elected officials are making things worse:

  • They just passed a bill requiring all rental properties to register with the state, including ongoing fees for doing so. The idea is to add a layer of tighter regulation and inspection to the market for rental housing, so the state can enforce environmental mandates – upgrading weatherization, replacing fossil fuel based heating systems, installing EV chargers, etc. – which will cost landlords more to implement, passing on the costs to renters. (See who voted for this: HouseSenate)
  • They just passed a bill requiring construction contractors to register with the state, including ongoing fees to do so. This bill would also make it illegal for your local handyman to do any job (labor and materials) over $2500 without a legal contract, as well as other costly mandates. This will discourage construction contractors from doing business in VT (where we already have a shortage), making the overall maintenance of rental units more expensive and difficult. (See who voted for this: HouseSenate)
  • The Global Warming Solutions Act mandates greenhouse gas reduction targets, and housing is a major area of concern. Regulations and mandates coming out of this law regarding construction, zoning, etc. will certainly increase the cost of housing and discourage the building of more housing of any kind. (See who voted for this: HouseSenate)
  • Property taxes. Vermont already has among the most expensive property tax burden in the country due to our having one of the most expensive per-pupil education costs in the country. Two initiatives passed this past session have the potential to explode Vermont’s property tax burden significantly more: recalibrating pupil weighting, and expanding government subsidized pre-k programs from birth to 5. Increased property tax costs will, of course, be passed along to renters.

So, then next time a politician laments on the campaign trail that the rent is too high, take a moment to see if their voting record is part of the solution, or part of the problem. 

– Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute. 

Categories: Commentary

3 replies »

  1. Information found on Vermont Secretary of State:

    Vermont Voter Registration Data: 2008 – Present – Total Registrations for November 2020 was 497,835

    Voter Turnout for 11/3/2020 – Total Registrations from All Counties was 506,312

    Difference between Total Registrations from both Reports is 8,477

    How come these numbers are different?

  2. Most towns, between twenty and twenty five percent of the rent goes right to taxes. Think I’m exaggerating? Take a duplex in Barre. Taxes are about $4800.00 a year, and the rent is $1000.00 a unit. Now try Montpelier or Waterbury.

Leave a Reply