Legislation

Roll Call! How YOUR rep, senator voted on vetoed Renewable Energy Standard

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Guy Page

How did your state senator(s) and member(s) of the Vermont House of Representatives vote on the controversial H.289, the revised Renewable Energy Standard bill vetoed last week by Gov. Phil Scott?

The bill attempts to hurry Vermont’s pace to zero-carbon electricity. No-one – critics and supporters alike – disputes it will cost ratepayers hundreds of millions of dollars to implement over 10 years.

However, supporters (like House Speaker Jill Krowinski) and opponents (like Scott and every Republican lawmaker) disagree on how many hundreds of millions of ratepayer dollars are needed. 

Supporters favor overhauling electricity generation by building many new, instate solar and wind power plants. Opponents (most vocally, Scott) say Vermont can reach zero carbon quicker and cheaper by building fewer wind/solar plants and contracting more with existing nuclear and hydro plants in nearby states and Canada. 

Scott administration study estimates H.289 will cost ratepayers as much as $1 billion over 10 years. His plan would cost about a fifth of that pricetag.

“Factoring in all the other taxes, fees and higher costs the Legislature has passed over the last two years, I simply cannot allow this bill to go into law,” Scott said. “With a better alternative to this bill available, I sincerely hope that the Legislature will think about Vermonters and the cost of living, and sustain this veto.” 

So the governor hopes. But Krowinski has pledged to override the veto at the Monday, June 17 veto session of the Legislature. Does she have the votes?

While roll calls show the House one vote short of the necessary 100 to override and the Senate two votes short of the necessary 20, in both House and Senate many lawmakers were absent. 

With all 180 lawmakers present, will Krowinski and Senate Pro Tem Phil Baruth muster the votes to override? Or will the absentees favor Scott?

Also, will some regular session Yes votes become No votes in the veto session, as lawmakers with an eye to re-election in November change their minds?

“I have heard many people say that Vermont must lead by example, as our carbon initiative will have no impact on climate change. But I ask myself at a time when we are demanding more and more out of the pockets of Vermonters, does it make sense to raise costs again on a bill that will do nothing for climate change? The purchase and manipulation of carbon credits is for the rich, not this brave little state. For that reason, I am voting yes for affordability by voting no on this bill.”  – Rep. Gina Galfetti

Some House Democrats ‘crossed over’ and voted No: Carroll and Corcoran of Bennington, Noyes of Wolcott, Pearl of Danville, and Sims of Craftsbury (a candidate for the Senate in 2024). It remains to be seen whether their votes will be needed to reach 100. No House Republicans voted Yes. 

Unless you count Barre Republican Gina Galfetti’s No vote as a Yes for affordability:

“I have heard many people say that Vermont must lead by example, as our carbon initiative will have no impact on climate change. But I ask myself at a time when we are demanding more and more out of the pockets of Vermonters, does it make sense to raise costs again on a bill that will do nothing for climate change? The purchase and manipulation of carbon credits is for the rich, not this brave little state. For that reason, I am voting yes for affordability by voting no on this bill.” 

For Democrat Rep. Mike Mrowicki (Putney), his actual Yes vote was about the children, the future, and the wishes of his constituents:

“I vote yes for my children and grandchild that we might leave a legacy of action. And I vote yes for the voters who sent me and a large majority here to do something about climate. Doing nothing is not an option.” 

In Mrowicki’s district that is home to the politically progressive Putney School, that may be true. In other districts, however, many voters are at least equally concerned with affordability. 

In the three weeks between today and June 17, legislators will be hearing from their constituents. Vermonters may contact their representatives through the Find A Legislator page on the Legislature’s website. 

House, Senate Roll Call for H.289 Renewable Energy Standard
House Roll Call Vote in House Journal, March 20
Total Yes99
Total No39
Total Absent11
House MemberVote
Andrews of WestfordYea
Andriano of OrwellYea
Anthony of Barre CityYea
Arrison of WeathersfieldYea
Arsenault of WillistonYea
Austin of ColchesterYea
Bartholomew of HartlandYea
Bartley of FairfaxNay
Beck of St. JohnsburyAbsent
Berbeco of WinooskiYea
Birong of VergennesAbsent
Black of EssexYea
Bluemle of BurlingtonYea
Bongartz of ManchesterYea
Bos-Lun of WestminsterYea
Boyden of CambridgeYea
Brady of WillistonYea
Branagan of GeorgiaNay
Brennan of ColchesterNay
Brown of RichmondYea
Brownell of PownalNay
Brumsted of ShelburneYea
Burditt of West RutlandAbsent
Burke of BrattleboroYea*
Burrows of West WindsorYea
Buss of WoodstockYea
Campbell of St. JohnsburyYea
Canfield of Fair HavenNay
Carpenter of Hyde ParkYea
Carroll of BenningtonNay
Casey of MontpelierYea
Chapin of East MontpelierYea
Chase of ChesterYea
Chase of ColchesterYea
Chesnut-Tangerman of Middletown SpringsYea
Christie of HartfordYea
Cina of BurlingtonYea
Clifford of Rutland CityNay
Coffey of GuilfordYea
Cole of HartfordYea*
Conlon of CornwallYea
Corcoran of BenningtonNay
Cordes of LincolnYea
Demar of EnosburghNay
Demrow of CorinthYea
Dickinson of St. Albans TownNay
Dodge of EssexYea
Dolan of Essex JunctionYea
Dolan of WaitsfieldYea
Donahue of NorthfieldNay
Durfee of ShaftsburyYea
Elder of StarksboroAbsent
Emmons of SpringfieldYea
Farlice-Rubio of BarnetYea
Galfetti of Barre TownNay*
Garofano of EssexYea
Goldman of RockinghamYea
Goslant of NorthfieldNay*
Graham of WilliamstownAbsent
Graning of JerichoYea
Gregoire of FairfieldNay
Hango of BerkshireNay
Harrison of ChittendenNay
Headrick of BurlingtonYea
Higley of LowellNay
Holcombe of NorwichYea
Hooper of BurlingtonYea
Hooper of RandolphYea
Houghton of Essex JunctionYea
Howard of Rutland CityYea
Hyman of South BurlingtonYea
James of ManchesterYea*
Jerome of BrandonYea
Kornheiser of BrattleboroYea
Krasnow of South BurlingtonYea
Krowinski of BurlingtonNot Voting
Labor of MorganNay
LaBounty of LyndonYea
Lalley of ShelburneYea
LaLonde of South BurlingtonYea
LaMont of MorristownYea
Lanpher of VergennesYea
Laroche of FranklinNay
Leavitt of Grand IsleAbsent
Lipsky of StoweNay
Logan of BurlingtonYea
Long of NewfaneYea
Maguire of Rutland CityNay
Marcotte of CoventryNay
Masland of ThetfordYea
Mattos of MiltonNay
McCann of MontpelierYea
McCarthy of St. Albans CityYea
McCoy of PoultneyNay*
McFaun of Barre TownNay
McGill of BridportYea
Mihaly of CalaisYea
Minier of South BurlingtonYea
Morgan of MiltonNay
Morris of SpringfieldYea
Morrissey of BenningtonNay
Mrowicki of PutneyYea*
Mulvaney-Stanak of BurlingtonAbsent
Nicoll of LudlowYea
Notte of Rutland CityYea
Noyes of WolcottNay
Nugent of South BurlingtonYea
O’Brien of TunbridgeYea
Ode of BurlingtonAbsent
Oliver of SheldonNay
Page of Newport CityNay
Pajala of LondonderryYea
Parsons of NewburyAbsent
Patt of WorcesterYea*
Pearl of DanvilleNay
Peterson of ClarendonNay
Pouech of HinesburgYea*
Priestley of BradfordYea
Quimby of LyndonNay
Rachelson of BurlingtonYea
Rice of DorsetYea
Roberts of HalifaxYea
Sammis of CastletonAbsent
Satcowitz of RandolphYea
Scheu of MiddleburyYea
Shaw of PittsfordAbsent
Sheldon of MiddleburyYea
Sibilia of DoverYea*
Sims of CraftsburyNay
Small of WinooskiYea
Smith of DerbyNay
Squirrell of UnderhillYea
Stebbins of BurlingtonYea*
Stevens of WaterburyYea
Stone of BurlingtonYea
Surprenant of BarnardYea
Taylor of ColchesterYea
Taylor of MiltonNay
Templeman of BrowningtonYea
Toleno of BrattleboroYea
Toof of St. Albans TownNay
Torre of MoretownYea*
Troiano of StannardYea
Walker of SwantonNay
Waters Evans of CharlotteYea
White of BethelYea
Whitman of BenningtonYea
Williams of Barre CityYea
Williams of GranbyNay*
Wood of WaterburyYea
* denotes comments in House Journal
Roll call vote in Vermont Senate, May 3
Total Yes18
Total No8
Total Absent3
Journal Page5/3/2024 SJ 164 P. 1340
Senate MemberVote
Baruth of Chittenden-Central DistrictYea
Bray of Addison DistrictYea
Brock of Franklin DistrictNay
Campion of Bennington DistrictAbsent
Chittenden of Chittenden-Southeast DistrictYea
Clarkson of Windsor DistrictYea
Collamore of Rutland DistrictNay
Cummings of Washington DistrictYea
Gulick of Chittenden-Central DistrictYea
Hardy of Addison DistrictYea
Harrison of Windham DistrictYea
Hashim of Windham DistrictYea
Ingalls of Essex DistrictNay
Kitchel of Caledonia DistrictYea
Lyons of Chittenden-Southeast DistrictYea
MacDonald of Orange DistrictYea
McCormack of Windsor DistrictAbsent
Norris of Franklin DistrictNay
Perchlik of Washington DistrictYea
Ram Hinsdale of Chittenden-Southeast DistrictYea
Sears of Bennington DistrictAbsent
Starr of Orleans DistrictNay
Vyhovsky of Chittenden-Central DistrictYea
Watson of Washington DistrictYea
Weeks of Rutland DistrictNay
Westman of Lamoille DistrictYea
White of Windsor DistrictYea
Williams of Rutland DistrictNay
Wrenner of Chittenden-North DistrictNay

Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Legislation, News Analysis

7 replies »

  1. All this shows is that Vermont is being led by ” IDIOTS “, a program that will do nothing, in the scheme of things as far as saving anything, but it will bankrupt its
    citizens !!

    You reap what you sow, you voted these inept fools in, agenda-driven policies that
    the ” Stupid Majority ” want at any cost, the cost to you and your lively hood …………

    Wake up people.

  2. Unbelievable that the voters of Vermont elect the sort of people who push an unattainable agenda, given how small VT is compared to the vast countries who won’t stop polluting. So we suffer a carbon tax that may very well drive more businesses to less expensive states where they can thrive. Does that sound like what’s happening in California anyone?

  3. now we know who to thank when we buy more expensive fuel this fall…………

    • I have lived here for 50 years, but I am fortunate enough to be able to flee this state during the winter. I spend my money in other states where the cost of living is so much less, do not need much heat, and this is because of our ‘woke’ but limited vision government. Hopefully, I will stumble on a place with the beautiful summers of VT ran by competent people. Suggestions welcomed.

  4. Satan [turning up the thermostat]: “You know, those flames don’t light themselves.”
    When the Yea voters get to Hell, they may want to complain about this. Today’s posturing ‘planet stewards’ are tomorrow’s planet stewers, and it will take a LOT of natural gas to keep them uncomfortable.

    Masque

    By Ellin Anderson

    In folly’s masquerade, they go —
    I heave them high, to lay them low,
    And break them on the merry wheel
    Where they may pirouette and reel
    On painted ponies, gray and brown;
    I jerk them up, to cast them down.

    Proud saddlers of humanity,
    They raise a glass of vanity
    In mirrors that extend the feast
    Into the entrails of the Beast,
    And only scent the brassy ring
    To choke in chains, on cash and bling.

    Wild pipes regale the carnival
    On prairie fields, whose golden pall
    Is staked to raise the crimson tent
    Of chaos, where the veil is rent
    By music like a knife of steam —
    Calliope’s last rigid scream.

    I make them caper, leap, and bound
    To fury’s screech, in envy’s round,
    And each baguette grabbed in the race
    Wins them their own forked tail to chase
    In darkness — though the hollow heart
    Knows it will finish at the start.

    My mercy oils the lamp of lands
    Who neither soil nor strain their hands,
    But bear the rat and magpie’s creed —
    A burden light as cattail seed —
    Like lint into a furnace, blown
    Where it may warm my frigid throne;
    Like corn into a furnace, hurled
    Where it may kindle all the world.

  5. “Scott administration study estimates H.289 will cost ratepayers as much as $1 billion over 10 years. His plan would cost about a fifth of that pricetag.” This is not true. And the incremental cost to rates over the next decade is expected to max out at 6.5%. The fiscal note on the bill from the non partisan Joint Fiscal Office is here: https://ljfo.vermont.gov/assets/Publications/2023-2024-As-Passed-the-General-Assembly/3c9156bdf8/H_289_Fiscal_Note_RES_Reform.pdf

  6. Please make a correction. Bartholomew lives in Hartland but “represents” Windsor 1.

    At a recent Select Board meeting in Windsor Bartholomew was arrogantly adamant about his stand on the bill and refused to acknowledge a selectman’s plea to slow down and consider the impact. At the same time, Burrows pretended to listen then shrugged her shoulders and went on her merry way to “folly’s masquerade” (reference to Ellin Anderson’s poem).