Agriculture

Klar: New York bill limiting cows sparks farmer revolt

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Big city sponsors face off against rural dairies.

by John Klar

A New York bill that would restrict the size of cattle farms has sparked controversy as urban climate change legislators from the Big Apple seek to limit rural livelihoods by imposing regulatory limits on the number of cows a farm can have. The attack on cow emissions by city slickers who know nothing about farming has farmers, legislators, and reportedly even Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul up in arms in opposition.

700-Cow Climate Limit?

Sponsored by downstate Democrats and several members of the Democratic Socialists of America, NY State Senate Bill 2025-S6530 “Prohibits the department of environmental conservation from issuing or authorizing any permits to new or expanding large concentrated animal feeding operations.” Supporters seek to restrict large-scale factory farms to protect the environment and small family farms, but many farmers claim their larger farms are also family-owned, with some spanning many generations.

Eric Dziedzic, a dairy farmer who milks 1,400 cows at Dziedzic Farms alongside his parents and other family members, has observed that Chobani Yogurt, Great Lakes Cheese, and Fairlife milk are all developing large processing operations in New York, which will require farmers to deliver the raw milk. The Northeast Dairy Producer Association reports that New York is the fifth-largest dairy-producing state in the country and that 95% of its farms are family-owned.

The draft bill states:

“CAFOs [concentrated animal feeding operations] pose an economic threat to smaller-sized farms and the rural economies supported by them. These large-scale factory farms are often run by large corporations that squeeze out local competition to maximize profits.

“CAFOs also release significant amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas, and harm the surrounding air quality through the release of ammonia and nitrogen oxides.”

Cows Aren’t the Problem

Justifying environmental regulation with claims of countering economic imbalances is objectionable to upstate dairymen; they argue that they already comply with far more stringent state environmental restrictions than federal laws require and that their family operations are being penalized for the perceived shortcomings of large corporations. In addition to the inequitable economic impacts on many mid-sized farms, the environmental rationale is based on shoddy climate science. Some studies show that eliminating cows can increase the net amount of methane emissions.

For city legislators, cows are a one-size-fits-all culprit. Ever since Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) declared war on cow flatulence, the climate gurus malign all cows equally, regardless of herd size. This methane-only metric overlooks the intricate relationships between cows, communities, economies, and food supplies. Cow farming supports upstaters’ livelihoods, provides high-quality nutrition for urban school lunches, protects scenic landscapes, and often sequesters more carbon than it emits.

As reported by Liberty Nation News, “[I]n the effort to reverse soil and environmental degradation, no player is more key than cows.” Many large farms employ regenerative practices while converting grass that is inedible to humans into milkshakes for city restaurants, steaks for Manhattan steakhouses, and burgers for Bronx bistros. Allegedly, the sponsors of the controversial cow-limiting bill did not even meet with the farming community they sought to rule from their concrete metropolis.

New York’s bovine-discriminatory cow bill has annoyed farmers and the rural communities that support and depend upon them. The state’s economy benefits from beef and dairy businesses, and rural denizens resent being economically harmed by socialist urbanites who think chocolate milk comes from brown cows.

Perhaps a farmers’ boycott of dairy products and meats shipped to the big city would demonstrate who works for whom (“Let them eat cake, or buns without burgers!”). But NYC legislators are already hearing the message loud and clear from distant pastures, and indications are that farm-loving Hochul would refuse to sign the thing even if it made its way to her desk.

The author is a Brookfield best-selling author, lawyer, farmer and pastor.


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 replies »

  1. Perhaps a bill limiting number of liberal Democrats in the legislature is in order?

    • A requirement for Government office (elected & bureaucratic) being mandatory to take a competency test. This will find out the “REAL” person. If a Constitutional requirement all the better. Many who get elected will say one point of view to get elected, then a 180 deg opposite turn in voting on introducing and bills. Need trust in the system.

    • Cows ? I’ve always wondered why our legislators, who are so consumed with all things green have not seen the advantage in catching the methane, which they produce in such copious amounts during the legislative session, and recycle it to heat the State House ?

  2. AMERICA’S PET

    By Ellin Anderson

    Don’t bother me, don’t slow me down, I’m wearing Grandma’s pearls
    And heading out of town to have my coffee with the girls.
    Beneath an elm tree’s leafy crown, they greet me with a moo —
    They’re Farmer Toby’s cows — the smartest folks in Massachoo.
    So see you later, here I go, with better things to do
    Than listen to you whine and moan — you haven’t got a clue!

    Upon the pasture by the road, their life is something sweet:
    They work all day, but work is play when all you do is eat!
    It isn’t far, I stop the car, and sit upon the hood
    To drink my coffee in the shade: now surely, life is good.
    The cows come over, I pick clover, offered in my hand;
    Beside the stream, it’s like a dream: they seem to understand.

    When we had tamed the wilderness with rifle, horse, and plow,
    You truly made a homestead where you settled with your cow.
    You might have bees, or apple trees, or game caught in the wild,
    But cows alone eat corn you’ve grown and feed a hungry child.
    A cow had worn the powder horn that won us Bunker Hill
    With shot and sword, and her reward is that we love her still.

    There’s something rotten going on, an old familiar game:
    They say the climate’s changing, and old Bossie is to blame!
    But she is innocent, just like the happy girls and boys
    Who keep some cows to love and pet, along with all their toys.
    If you despise your country, then you hate the small farms, too:
    When Commie thugs say “Eat zee bugs,” don’t listen to their poo!

    I plan to go where I’ll see snow through winter, spring, and fall:
    I’m leaving for Vermont, the state that’s prettiest of all!
    I hope that when I get there, I can start a farm for one,
    With vegetables and chickens, and a moo-cow just for fun.
    So girls, goodbye: and please don’t cry: I’ll find your cousins now —
    To those who hate our freedom, all I’ll say is: Have a cow.

  3. Truly visionary crapola sure to inspire Vermont legislators to create a “me too.”

    Hope they have a Plan B on how to feed the population before the get wind of it that something may be missing from their diet shortly.

    I am sure that given Vermont is a smaller state logically rules of proportionality will apply with a significantly lower cow headcount than the 700 proposed by NY . Something on the order of magnitude of 2-3 would seem to fit their visionary thinking. Of course this is inclusive of those dedicated to Ben and Jerries needs not leaving much for the rest of us.

  4. Imagine reading this proposed bit of silliness to a person born in the 1800s or even early to mid 1900s. They would pronounce you daft. As I was reading Mr Klar’s excellent comments regarding the introduced bill, it reminded me just how close this thinking is to being told how many children you can have.