Legislation

House Speaker postpones contractor registration veto vote until April 22

Veto override at least one vote short, lawmaker says

By Guy Page

The House vote to override Gov. Phil Scott’s veto of H157, the construction contractor registration bill, has been postponed until April 22.

A GOP lawmaker told the Chronicle Wednesday that House Speaker Jill Krowinski (D-Burlington) is one vote short of the 100 needed to override Scott’s veto.  

Today’s House Calendar reads: “Action Postponed Until April 20, 2022 – Governors Veto – H. 157 An act relating to registration of construction contractors.”


Sponsored by weatherization advocate Rep. Scott Campbell (D-St. Johnsbury), H157 creates a state registry for all contractor jobs of $3,500 or more. Covered work includes virtually all currently unlicensed carpentry, plumbing, electrical, paving, roofing building, weatherization, wastewater, and all other interior or exterior contracting work. 

The bill requires paid registration, insurance of at least $300,000 coverage per job, and written contract offers for every job. It allocates funds for two state employee “advisors” to help the contractors comply with the law. 

The bill also creates a ‘voluntary’ contractor certification program because “wide dissemination of information on codes, standards, and training is vital to improving construction techniques throughout the State’s construction industry. Since building thermal conditioning represents over one-quarter of the State’s greenhouse gas emissions, improving energy performance is a key strategy for meeting the requirements of the Global Warming Solutions Act.”

Campbell is a member of the Legislature’s Joint Carbon Emissions Reduction Committee. He has extensive professional experience in the not-for-profit weatherization sector. According to Campbell’s legislative biography, he “directed the Weatherization Program for CVOEO in Burlington for nearly 12 years, and most recently designed and directed 3E Thermal, an energy upgrade program serving affordable apartment housing throughout Vermont, for nearly 10 years.”

The bill passed the house 82-45 on January 19, well short of the 100 votes needed to override a veto. However, some members of the Democratic/Progressive majority who voted against the bill on Jan. 19 may be pressured to support the majority’s veto override efforts. 

Presented as a bill to protect homeowners from unscrupulous contractors, H157 was vetoed Thursday by Gov. Scott because it “has the potential to undermine and weaken a large number of Vermont’s small businesses – small, local residential contractors – at a time when we all agree we must prioritize new and revitalized housing.”

Specifically, Scott said H157 “favors larger and more established businesses at the expense of small entry-level businesses by imposing, by law, specific contract and insurance requirements that many of the smaller businesses will not be able to meet. Such specific requirements are rarely, if ever imposed on other professions. Ultimately, these provisions harm small businesses – which could lead to closures – and they harm consumers through higher costs and fewer options for making needed repairs.”

6 replies »

  1. I support Gov. Scotts’ veto of H157 for all the reasons Gov. Scott mentions. They say small businesses are the backbone of Vermont’s economy but our legislators seem hellbent on regulating small businesses to death. They did it to the childcare industry. They did it to the small car inspection dealers. They did it to our independent health care providers and hospitals. The supporters of this bill reek of self interest.

  2. The stated priority of Gov. Scott’s tenure in office has been addressing the high cost of living in Vermont. The Legislature seems to never get that memo and continues to pile on. This bill is yet another example of how out of touch the demoprogs of the legislature really are to the plight of the average, working Vermont homeowner. In the spirit of the Canadian truckers protest, every contractor in the State of Vermont should agree to be “way too busy” whenever called upon to repair the roof, upgrade the wiring or excavate a septic system by any member of the Legislature who supports this registry.

  3. If veto is over ruled it would just create another underground economy, And higher costs for everyone else. As an added bonus, we’d get another overinflated Government bureaucracy.

    • You nailed it. More contractors will want to get paid under the table/cash so less tax revenue AND less oversight, just the opposite of what the Montpelier tyrants are attempting to “accomplish”. Anyone who has looked into paying someone to do projects lately knows that it is a contractor’s market and they can have their pick of the jobs that work out best for them. What a parliament of whores.

  4. One point that I have not seen expressed is that there is nothing to prevent a person from requiring a contractor to provide a written contract, proof of insurance, etc. There’s nothing to stop a contractor to provide this information in their advertising.

  5. At the rate of inflation, increased cost of new home building (+$19,000 current estimates) and a housing bubble on pop watch – there may be minimal contractors left to register. Cost of home repairs factor in as well. While the Legislature dreams up new ways to pick the last lint from our pockets…the writing is on the wall – economic collapse incoming. Prepare and plan for the recession of all recessions.

Leave a Reply