Business

32 towns OK retail pot stores, 7 say no

Results from four communities – including Rutland City – still unknown

by Guy Page

According to an unofficial survey of Vermont municipal and media websites, 32 Vermont municipalities said “yes” at Town Meeting yesterday to allow retail marijuana operations. Seven said no. Information for four other communities is as yet unavailable.

Under the State of Vermont’s regulated marijuana market, retail stores may open only in communities where voters have approved that type of business.

CommunityDecisionVote or %
Barre CityYes767-463
BoltonYes114-63
BristolYes513-264
CambridgeYes58-42%
ChesterYes318-267
DerbyYes55-45%
Essex TownYes59-40%
Fair HavenYes285-230
FaystonYes129-78
FerrisburghYes63-37%
Grand IsleYes316-223
HardwickYesUnk
HartfordYes61-39%
ManchesterYes591-355
MarlboroYes201-94
MiddlesexYes360-195
MiltonYes54-46%
MoretownYes61-39%
New HavenYes285-230
PittsfordYes51-49%
PoultneyYes298-258
ProctorYes125-102
PutneyYes384-263
RockinghamYes318-187
Rutland TownYes468-425
SheldonYes71-69
SpringfieldYes715-632
St. Albans TownYesUnk
StrattonYesUnk
WaitsfieldYes65-35%
WallingfordYes269-228
WilmingtonYes173-85
WoodstockYesUnk
CastletonNo351-301
EdenNo27-19
Leicester TownNo56-53
Mount HollyNo250-147
NortonNoUnk
Swanton VillageNo125-119
VernonNo126-190
RichfordUnknown
Rutland CityUnknown
StockbridgeUnknown
WolcottUnknown

Yesterday’s results bring to 65 the number of Vermont municipalities that have said yes to retail pot. Towns where it has already been approved are Alburgh, Barton, Berlin, Bennington, Brandon, Brattleboro, Brownington, Burke, Burlington, Danby, Danville, Duxbury, East Burke, Jamaica, Johnson, Londonderry, Middlebury, Montgomery, Montpelier, Morristown, Pawlet, Peacham, Pownal, Randolph, St. Johnsbury, Salisbury, South Hero, Strafford, Sutton, Vergennes, Waterbury, Windsor, and Winooski.

Marijuana retail distributors in ‘Yes’ communities now must undergo a state-regulated licensing process. Retail sales are likely to begin late this year or next year.

5 replies »

  1. For those with concerns on cannabis retail sales go to http://www.vthope.net/mjpics.html You will find posters you can download and disperse with source references included. These probably should have gone up before any voting, but at least you can better inform your community about the hazards and alert parents to the challenges and concerns they face. Today’s pot is 10-30x stronger and has more psychotic episodes. We need to team to protect the brains of our young people.

  2. If Joe Benning gets his way with S25 – all 180ish towns that haven’t voted will be told you had your chance to say if you want commercialized cannabis, now the legislators will decide for you – and only 10 towns in the state will not have commercialized cannabis. Remember this, as Joe is running for Lt. Governor. Perhaps some towns will want to arrange to vote on this before the end of the session.

  3. So, I don’t smoke weed, but as a social ill, it concerns me less than alcohol. That is to say, I don’t care about this issue at all.

    However, buried inside this issue is a much, MUCH more interesting one which will be in the history books for ages, and no one seems to be talking about it.

    Marijuana is federally illegal. Like, Schedule 1, serious time in a federal penitentiary illegal, and clearly many states don’t care at all. How is this a thing? I’m pretty sure that if I were to start manufacturing and selling machine guns, I would get a less-than-friendly visit from the ATF. Precisely why is the DEA not out here shooting people’s dogs and burning fields? How can so many people flagrantly ignore seriously-punishable federal law and we all still pretend that federal laws matter?