Vax discrimination suit goes to court May 10

by Guy Page

On March 2, Jim Hogue of Calais, Emily Peyton of Putney, Karen Eddings, Morningstar Porta, Kathleen Tarrant, and Deborah Dailey filed for an immediate emergency injunction in US Federal Court against Gov. Phil Scott, Attorney General TJ Donovan, and Health Commissioner Mark Levine “to halt orders, rules and enforcement regarding the lifting of quarantine solely for those who vaccinate” and other measures.

The following press release was issued yesterday by Jim Hogue of Calais and Emily Peyton of Putney:

“Judge William K. Sessions III has called the first hearing in the lawsuit that six plaintiffs have brought against VT Governor Philip B. Scott, T.J. Donovan (VT Attorney General) and Mark Levine (VT Health Commissioner). The hearing will take place May 10th at 1:30 at the federal court on 11 Elmwood Avenue in Burlington.

“The plaintiffs allege that the defendants are guilty of constitutional overreach and of misrepresenting the medical facts about the corona virus (Covid 19). The purpose of the hearing is to provide testimony as to whether or not the case against the defendants shall go forward or be dismissed.

“This is a public hearing. All are encouraged to attend. The Plaintiffs will be happy to take questions prior to and after the hearing outside the court house. Their website is

Photo: Jim Hogue and Emily Peyton discuss lawsuit is this YouTube video.

Categories: Covid-19

5 replies »

  1. The Nuremberg trials established that all of humanity would be guarded by an international legal shield and that even a Head of State would be held criminally responsible and punished for aggression and Crimes Against Humanity. The right of humanitarian intervention to put a stop to Crimes Against Humanity – even by a sovereign against his own citizens – gradually emerged from the Nuremberg principles affirmed by the United Nations.

    The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
    This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreach- ing, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
    The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, di- rects or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
    The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
    The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
    The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
    No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
    The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
    Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
    The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
    During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
    During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experi- mental subject.
    The concept of “Crimes Against Humanity” has been a product of very recent historical, political and social developments which has brought war crimes under a different light in international law, and very much under the scope of Human Rights, which have impregnated the law of war as an international, codified phenomenon in many ways. As a provision, it was the initial step that began a whole new approach from part of the international community towards certain abuses against civilians during periods of war and also during peacetime. Certain practices became theoretically “illegal” in a very broad sense within the international community, criminalizing governments, collectives and individuals, whether military or civilian, and covering the commission of crimes both in an individual basis as well as in a collective sense.

    Why Pregnant Women Have Been Excluded from COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trials
    Despite significant advocacy efforts, no pregnant women were initially included in COVID-19 trials—including those from Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Janssen, AstraZeneca and Novavax. Their exclusion can be attributed to lots of reasons such as:
    Historical precedent within American’s healthcare system to exclude pregnant women from clinical trials
    Concerns about delaying FDA approval
    Concerns about possible harm to the pregnant woman and her fetus

  3. Dr Mercola quote – the man who saved our right to buy supplements: “Its my belief that this clearly has every sign of a depopulation strategy there’s nothing that’s good gonna come of this vaccine, its my belief that ultimately this vaccine will kill more people than covid did, I am really convinced of that, and you won’t’ know, its will never be known because they are suppressing all the information. Anytime someone dies from a vaccine injury within hours, it was a coincidence, just a coincidence, whereas if they had a covid 19 test that was a false positive, and they died three months later from a motorcycle accident, its a covid 19 death. So these statistics are manipulated up the wazzooo and their manipulations support the narrative that they want which is to drive fear into the population so that they can push them into the vaccine. They are not winning, they are not winning. The CDC came out and had one of the most egregious recommendations they ever made, they recommended the covid 19 vaccine for pregnant women. Even though, even in the rigged safety trials that were grossly abbreviated there was never any pregnant women in the trial. And we know that just basic precautionary principles you never give unproven untested therapeutic intervention to pregnant women, yet they recommended it. And we are looking at a minimum of a 30% miscarriage rate, probably higher. That’s what’s being reported and that’s what’s self reported so we know the impacts are much higher. I mean this is reprehensible medical malpractice
    They are not vaccines, even though the dictionary, i forget which dictionary they changed teh definition to include this but they clearly do not meet the criteria previously used for all traditional vaccines, these are engineered with genetic technology that has not been proven, never been proven, theres no safety trials that confirm it, essential they put in messenger rna which is a bit of genetic material in your body that allows your body to produce antibodies and they erciene it as a safe way but these rna molecules are very fragile very perishable and they have to encapsulate them, at least the moderna and the pfizer, not the j&J vaccine and they encase it in a nano liposome thats composed of polyethylene glycol which itself can cause and autoimmune reaction but these nano liposome of my gosh, gives
    The instructions to create this spike protein to most tissues of your body and if it gets into the liver or the bone marrow it can produce, it can actually cause severe clotting disorders which has killed many people. Its well documented its no question. It has killed people. And I think the reports, the last I looked it was over 3thousand, from vaers data base had died from this and we know, there’s lots of science to show it, there’s only 1 to 10 percent of the actual number of cases that are reported, so the three thousand that dies its at least 30 thousand to 300 thousand who have died from the vaccine already. Totally being suppressed. ”

    Dr. Joseph Mercola founded in 1997 as a portal for natural health information and resources. It is one of the first health websites established to cater to readers who are interested in holistic medicine. is now routinely among the top 10 natural health websites on the internet, boasting over a million newsletter subscribers, and garnering more than 10 million page views per month. aims to provide up-to-date natural health information and data that will most benefit its readers and subscribers, helping them achieve peak health and adopt better lifestyles. It also strives to expose corporate, government and mass media hype that diverts people from what is truly best for their health and often toward a path that leads straight into an early grave.

  4. We need more lawsuits against this tyrannical Vermont government. Where are the courageous attorneys? No Patriots in Vermont, No one to uphold the Law and the Constitution? To be complacent is to hand over this State to Communists.

Leave a Reply