|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|

By Jonathan Shorman, for News from the States
The U.S. Postal Service won’t deliver mail ballots in states that refuse to turn over lists of voters under a proposed rule, the agency’s chief executive said Wednesday, angering Democrats who warn the decision will disenfranchise voters.
Editor’s note: Vermont is among the states whose attorneys general have challenged the Trump order in a lawsuit.
Postmaster General David Steiner defended the rule at a Senate hearing and dismissed accusations that the Postal Service was acting politically after President Donald Trump signed an executive order in March restricting voting by mail.
“If a state refuses to turn their absentee voter list over to the federal government, will the Postal Service still mail their ballots under this proposed rule?” Sen. Gary Peters, a Michigan Democrat, asked Steiner.
“Under our proposed regulation, no,” Steiner replied.
Steiner’s testimony, before the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee, marked the clearest acknowledgment yet by a federal official that the rule threatens to upend voting by mail across the country.
If the rule takes effect and Democratic-led states refuse to comply, the requirements would effectively limit mail voting to Republican-led states during November midterm elections to decide control of Congress.
The Postal Service put forward the rule after Trump ordered Steiner to require states to submit lists of anticipated mail voters to the agency as a condition of having ballots delivered.
Trump cancels signing ceremony
The executive order is one of several steps the Trump administration has taken this year to influence how elections are administered, along with the Department of Justice suing states to obtain sensitive voter data.
Underscoring the depth of Trump’s interest, as Steiner was speaking Wednesday morning the president abruptly called off a U.S. Capitol ceremony to sign a bipartisan housing bill because of the Senate’s refusal to pass the SAVE America Act. The legislation would require voters to show documents, such as a birth certificate or passport, proving their citizenship.
“Now we have this new rule you’ve put out saying that states have to turn over their voting rolls and you, the U.S. Postal Service, will decide who’s approved to send their ballot through the mail,” Sen. Elissa Slotkin, a Michigan Democrat, said. “It’s just another backdoor way of trying to influence this election.“
Slotkin said Trump’s decision to cancel the housing bill signing demonstrated the “level of obsession this president has” over elections.
Turning over names
Every state would have to provide the names of residents expected to vote by mail. Additionally, eight states and Washington, D.C., conduct elections by mailing all voters a ballot, meaning election officials would have to provide information on every voter. Those states include California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Washington.
Trump and his aides argue the restrictions are needed to combat noncitizen voting, which occurs very rarely. Democrats and voting rights groups have sued over the order, arguing it’s an unconstitutional assertion of presidential authority over state-run elections. No judge has yet halted it.
Steiner sought to place himself outside the controversy and said, in response to a question, that the Postal Service would adhere to a court order blocking the rule if one were issued. Asked about the legal authority underlying the rule, he said he would “have to defer that to the courts to understand the authority.”
Steiner, who became the postmaster general in July 2025, cast the rule as primarily focused on best practices for election mail, a description that understates the scope of the proposal, which postal experts call unprecedented.
“I’m not a political person and the Postal Service is not a political organization,” Steiner said.
Dems urge Steiner to withdraw rule
Democrats expressed sharp disagreement with Steiner and accused him of folding to Trump’s efforts to exercise more control over elections. Steiner answers to the USPS Board of Governors, not the president, and his critics say he is endangering the agency’s independence by complying with the executive order.
Every Senate Democrat, as well as two independents who caucus with the party, on Tuesday signed a letter to Steiner urging him to withdraw the rule. The letter warns that aside from the rule’s legal and constitutional problems, it’s not feasible for state and local election officials to meet its requirements.
“The proposed regulation demands that the Postal Service set up an entirely new system and database to process and transmit millions of absentee ballots that is secure and accessible to every American election official, just months prior to a general election,” the letter says.
At Wednesday’s hearing, GOP senators mostly steered clear of the mail ballot rule, instead focusing on the official topic, the Postal Service’s finances. But Sen. Bernie Moreno, an Ohio Republican, accused Democrats of hypocrisy over their past support of the “For the People Act.”
The sweeping bill, offered when Democrats last controlled Congress, would have required states to offer same-day voter registration and expand mail voting. Opponents said it amounted to nationalized elections.
“Three years later all of them are testifying, ‘It’s outrageous, President Trump is trying to nationalize elections.’ No, he’s not, he’s trying to get rid of voter fraud,” Moreno said, adding that Democrats had now “dug up from their bottom desk drawer” the Constitution.
“Should we get back to post office stuff now?” Moreno said.
“Absolutely,” Steiner replied.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Elections









Hmm… I wonder if my deceased relatives are still voting in Virginia and California. Betcha they are. And I wonder if I’ll ever find out.
Wouldn’t it be interesting to know whether they are still on those state’s voter roles? A call to the pertinent election officials might be a real “eye-opener.” BTW, anyone wondering whether someone is on voter roles should make this call. In Vermont, reach out to your town clerk. After all… they say it’s to ensure “election integrity.”
We have an absolute RIGHT to demand a fair & transparent, orderly voting & vote counting process.
The author states that Trump and his aides argue the restrictions are needed to combat noncitizen voting, which occurs very rarely.
How does he know it rarely occurs? Does he have any proof? And even if it occurs rarely, does that make it okay? I highly doubt the author would be okay with his vote being canceled by a noncitizen’s vote.
Voting by mail except in the case of solicited absentee ballots is an invitation to widespread fraud and ballot harvesting. Why should a government agency like the postal service be a party to and participate in such fraud? There are plenty of examples of where the postal service is engaged in actively discouraging and aiding in the prosecution of mail fraud, so why should handling unsolicited ballots be any different? Typical that Vermont’s moonbat Attorney General is opposing this move.
“ it’s not feasible for state and local election officials to meet its requirements.”, what kind of baloney is that statement, if the democrats can handle their rank choice voting scheme, then they can certainly turn over their mail in ballots list, what are they afraid of?
After seeing all the crap that just took place in the California primaries (they are still counting votes there) John Thune and the other Republican senators who won’t go back to the old-time filibuster and pass the “SAVE ACT” are showing the voters what they really are. They are the Uni-Party. They don’t care if our elections are secure or not as long as they stay in power. SECURE OUR ELECTIONS.
VOTER ID. YOU MUST BE A U’S. CITIZEN TO VOTE
NO MAIL IN BALLOTS.
ONE DAY IN PERSON VOTING.
CLEAN THE VOTER ROLLS.
https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2026/06/25/exclusive-sen-rand-paul-biggest-threat-validity-election-is-when-you-dont-vote-in-person/
Yeah, right Whoopie. You are too stoopid to know you’re a Communist.
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2026/06/25/video-the-views-whoopi-goldberg-claims-no-one-wants-voter-id-laws-while-80-percent-of-america-supports-id-to-vote/
Any organization or private entity that intends to utilize mass mail, must compare their mailing list against the USPS data, however it appears mailed ballots are exempt from that process. The purpose of this process is to ensure mail is being delivered to current legal addresses for the recipients.
One of the greatest criticisms of mailing ballots in VT is that the voter rolls are not current and this results in ballots going to addresses where the voter no longer resides, including those who have moved or died. This includes situations where several ballots have been delivered to multifamily buildings to those who no longer live there, risking ballot misuse. By submitting the voter database to the USPS for the ballots before mailing there is an option to correct the recipient addresses or where there is no known address for the recipient or the address is undeliverable a process to reduce the number of “ghost” ballots. This makes sense to me.
Now about those voting machines the Sec of State office forced on every town throughout the state that you feed the mail in ballots into…
We are watching every move.