The phantom on Vermont maps

By Timothy Page on July 14, 2025 • ( 1 Comment )

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

For the Vermont place called Satans Kingdom, the devil lies only in the details.

by Timothy Page

In the hills of Leicester, Vermont, near the southern shore of Lake Dunmore, lies one of cartography’s most intriguing mysteries: Satans Kingdom, a place that appears on virtually every major mapping platform yet doesn’t officially exist according to local authorities. This unincorporated community represents a fascinating case study in how place names can achieve a form of digital immortality, persisting across mapping platforms despite—or perhaps because of—their disputed status.

The etymology of Satans Kingdom follows a straightforward pattern common throughout New England. Satans Kingdom was so named for their rocky soil, which is unsuitable for farming.¹ This practical explanation fits perfectly with Vermont’s tradition of descriptive place naming, where early settlers chose names that reflected the challenges or characteristics of the land they encountered.

The name places Satans Kingdom within a broader New England tradition of “Satan’s Kingdom” designations that typically mark areas of difficult terrain, harsh agricultural conditions, or locations that proved challenging for settlement. Satan’s Kingdom has been noted for its unusual place name,³ joining similar locations in Massachusetts and Connecticut that share this distinctive nomenclature.

Unlike some place names that evolved from Native American words or honored prominent figures, Satans Kingdom’s moniker emerged from the mundane reality of Vermont agriculture. Rocky soil meant poor farming prospects, and settlers weren’t shy about expressing their frustration through colorful place names. This practical origin story gives the name an authentic local character that would later prove crucial to its persistence on maps.

The Mapping Phenomenon: How Digital Cartography Preserves Place Names

Satans Kingdom’s appearance across multiple mapping platforms reveals the complex ecosystem of modern cartography. The location appears on numerous major mapping services, each referencing the same basic geographic coordinates and description. The neighborhood of Satans Kingdom is located in Addison County in the State of Vermont, according to MapQuest,² which provides detailed neighborhood information including time zones and nearby cities.

The Geographic Names Information System (GNIS), maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey, serves as the authoritative database for place names in the United States. Satans Kingdom Populated Place Profile with maps, schools, hospitals, airports, real estate MLS listings and local jobs. Location: Addison County, VT, FID: 1461375⁴ demonstrates how the location has been assigned a formal Feature ID number, giving it official recognition within the federal geographic database.

This federal recognition creates a cascading effect throughout the mapping ecosystem. When the USGS includes a place name in its database, that information flows to numerous other mapping platforms, real estate databases, and geographic information systems. The result is a form of cartographic validation that can persist even when local knowledge disputes the place’s existence.

The Digital Echo Chamber: How Maps Reference Maps

Modern mapping platforms often reference each other, creating what cartographers call “circular verification.” When one authoritative source includes a place name, other platforms adopt that information, and the repeated appearances across multiple sources create an illusion of independent verification. This phenomenon helps explain why Satans Kingdom appears so consistently across different mapping services.

The process begins with historical maps and surveys that may have recorded local place names during their creation. The goal of The National Map’s Historical Topographic Map Collection (HTMC) is to provide a digital repository of USGS 1:250,000 scale and larger maps printed between 1884 and 2006.⁶ These historical maps often captured place names that were in local use at the time of survey, regardless of their official status.

When these historical maps were digitized and incorporated into modern geographic databases, the place names they contained gained a new form of permanence. Digital mapping systems excel at preserving information but struggle with the nuanced task of determining whether a place name reflects current reality or historical usage.

The Persistence Paradox: Why It Won’t Disappear

The controversy surrounding Satans Kingdom illustrates a fundamental challenge in modern cartography: the tension between official recognition and digital persistence. Despite local denials of the place’s existence, the name continues to appear across mapping platforms because removing it would require coordinated action across multiple database systems.

Repeated denials by the Vermont Department of Tourism did not prevent Swift from confirming that Satans Kingdo exists, according to a 2025 article in Seven Days Vermont.⁵ This official denial actually highlights the name’s persistence—the fact that the Vermont Department of Tourism feels compelled to deny its existence suggests that the place name has achieved enough recognition to warrant official response.

The digital nature of modern mapping creates a form of bureaucratic inertia around place names. Once a location enters major geographic databases, it tends to persist because:

Database Synchronization: Mapping platforms regularly update their databases from authoritative sources, but these updates typically add new information rather than remove existing entries.
User Contributions: Many mapping platforms allow users to add or verify place names, creating additional pathways for names to persist even when official sources might remove them.
Commercial Integration: Real estate platforms, business directories, and other commercial services often reference geographic databases, creating additional instances of the place name across the internet.

The Leicester Contradiction: Local Knowledge vs. Digital Reality

The most fascinating aspect of the Satans Kingdom phenomenon is the stark contradiction between local knowledge and digital presence. Local authorities in Leicester maintain that the place doesn’t exist, yet it continues to appear on maps, in real estate listings, and in geographic databases.

This contradiction reflects a broader challenge in the digital age: the difficulty of correcting information once it becomes widely distributed across interconnected systems. Unlike the pre-digital era, when a map error might be corrected in the next edition, digital mapping creates persistent networks of information that can be remarkably resistant to correction.

The persistence of Satans Kingdom also reveals how place names can achieve a form of independent existence in the digital realm. Regardless of whether physical signs mark the location or whether local residents acknowledge its existence, the name continues to function as a geographic reference point in the digital landscape.

The Cartographic Legacy: A 21st Century Ghost Town

Satans Kingdom represents a new category of place: the cartographic ghost town. Unlike traditional ghost towns that mark the locations of abandoned settlements, Satans Kingdom exists primarily in the digital realm, sustained by the interconnected nature of modern mapping systems.

This digital persistence creates its own form of reality. People search for Satans Kingdom, visit the area, and reference the location precisely because it appears on maps. The mapping presence generates real-world activity, creating a feedback loop that reinforces the name’s continued existence.

The phenomenon also highlights the evolving nature of place names in the digital age. Traditional place names emerged from local usage and gradually gained wider recognition. Satans Kingdom demonstrates how digital systems can preserve and amplify place names in ways that transcend local knowledge or official recognition.

The Enduring Power of Names

The story of Satans Kingdom illustrates the complex relationship between place names, official recognition, and digital preservation in the 21st century. What began as a practical description of rocky soil has evolved into a cartographic phenomenon that persists across multiple mapping platforms despite local denials of its existence.

This persistence speaks to the enduring power of place names and the challenges of managing geographic information in an interconnected digital world. Satans Kingdom may not exist as a recognized community in Leicester, Vermont, but it has achieved a form of digital immortality that ensures its continued presence on maps for the foreseeable future.

The case serves as a reminder that in the digital age, the line between official recognition and popular usage has become increasingly blurred. Place names can achieve their own form of existence through cartographic persistence, creating geographic realities that exist independently of local knowledge or official sanction.

Whether Satans Kingdom represents a legitimate historical place name or a cartographic error, its continued presence on maps demonstrates how digital systems can preserve and propagate geographic information in ways that previous generations of mapmakers could never have imagined. In the end, the rocky soil that gave the place its name may be less significant than the digital terrain that ensures its continued existence.