|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Bill awaiting action by Senate Judiciary Committee, which includes Vermont Sen. Peter Welch
The killing of three children and a teacher at an Oregon elementary school Thursday, October 15, is renewing attention to federal legislation that would allow qualified active and retired law enforcement officers to carry concealed firearms in school zones and other locations where guns are generally prohibited.
The LEOSA Reform Act of 2025, H.R. 2243, passed the U.S. House last year but has remained in the Senate Judiciary Committee since May 15, 2025. Vermont Democratic Sen. Peter Welch serves on the committee.
The renewed debate follows a shooting at Silver Rail Elementary School in Bend, Oregon, where a 16-year-old boy armed with a long gun killed three children, ages 5, 8 and 11, and a teacher. A 7-year-old student and a 54-year-old teacher were hospitalized in critical condition.
The teenage suspect, whose name had not been released, was shot and killed by an armed community member who saw him enter the school, followed him inside and confronted him, according to Bend police.
The Bend school district does have School Resource Officers embedded in their schools. It is unclear whether one was present during the shooting.
Police said the suspect gained entry by shooting through locked doors. The first emergency call came at 12:59 PM, and officers arrived at 1:02 PM. By then, the suspect had been shot.
The incident has drawn attention to the potential role of armed citizens in stopping school shootings, although authorities have not established that the person who killed the Oregon suspect was an active or retired law enforcement officer.
Sponsored by Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, the legislation would expand the existing Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, which allows qualified active and retired law enforcement officers to carry concealed firearms across state lines.
Under the proposed changes, those officers could carry concealed firearms and ammunition, including magazines, in school zones, national parks, certain federal facilities open to the public, and state, local and private property open to the public. The bill would also allow states to reduce the frequency of firearms qualification requirements for retired officers.
The House approved the legislation May 14, 2025, by a vote of 229-193. All 215 Republicans voting supported the measure, along with 14 Democrats. Vermont Democratic Rep. Becca Balint voted against it.
Supporters argue that expanding concealed-carry rights for trained law enforcement professionals could provide additional protection during emergencies, particularly when police officers are not immediately available.
Opponents have raised concerns about expanding firearms access in sensitive locations, including schools, and the risks of introducing additional armed individuals into emergency situations.
The legislation has not received a Senate floor vote. Its most recent recorded action was referral to the Judiciary Committee on May 15, 2025.
Welch is one of the committee’s Democratic members. Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa chairs the committee, which would have to consider the measure before it could advance through the usual legislative process.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
We protect banks, airports, musicians, politicians and sensitive manufacturing facilities with armed guards. But not our children? The anti-gunners are out of line by preventing this. Until there’s a better solution, this is the solution. Bad guys do not follow rules. Meet them at the gate.
Since the Columbine massacre, there was a push to have armed police in schools, and to not alarm the anti-gun folks and anti-police types, call them “resource officers”. After George Floyd overdosed and the whole BLM/hating on the police thing went down, the liberals wanted the police removed from schools as they were considered too “triggering” for the impressionable yoots, who they wanted to not trust police. The sad fact is that a uniformed officer in a school would be the first target of a violent nutcase who wishes to engage in the cowardly act of attacking school children. It is much more effective to repel such an attack by having responsible people in the school carrying concealed, so they dont present themselves as obvious targets. We can only hope that Sen. Welch understands this reality. An armed society is a polite society.
Am I sensing an admission that “gun free zones” are not the panicia that Libs purported them to be ?
But just like socialism, we just haven’t tried gun-free zones out for long enough to make them work.
Re: Oregon school shooting renews calls for Congress to expand gun rights for police officers.
Is this a joke? Now we need congress and Peter Welch’s permission to expand gun rights to selective groups of citizens as if all the other citizens in the United States don’t have those same rights already. The person who took down the Oregon school shooter was just a regular concealed carry good guy. The only way to go is to have Constitutional Carry in every state in the Union and get rid of “gun free zones”. A gun free zone is a target rich environment
The Second Amendment does not grant us any rights, it tells the government it cannot infringe on the right to keep and bear arms we were born with. Congress does not need to expand rights we already have. Just saying that we need congress to expand gun rights is admitting that our rights have already been infringed upon. Welch and congress have no constitutional authority to expand or deny any rights granted us by the Constitution. ALL GUN CONTROL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL – PERIOD.
“The very text of the 2nd Amendment implicitly recognizes the pre-existence of the right and only declares it shall not be infringed”. – Antonin Scalia
“Nowhere else in the Constitution does a ‘Right’ attributed to ‘The People’ refer to anything but an individual right”. – Antonin Scalia
“The Constitution is not a living organism, it’s a legal document, and it says what it says, and it doesn’t say what it doesn’t say”. – Antonin Scalia
Concealed carry is not a right, but a unconstitutional privilege given to from government. Comment from Richard Day. People that engage in this activity have been greatly misled thinking they are special.
It’s my right and I use it every single day.