Legislature seeks universal school meals money

By Leonine Public Affairs

Starting last Tuesday, the Legislature relaxed the State House mask requirement, making it optional in most areas of the building. This, combined with a few public tour groups visiting the building for perhaps the first time since 2020 made the State House start to feel reminiscent of pre-pandemic times. 

Legislators are considering potential revenue sources to pay for some big ticket items that have emerged as legislative priorities over the course of the session. Universal school meals and the Vermont child tax credit are proposals being reviewed in the House and Senate respectively.

Both proposals would continue programs that were federally funded throughout much of the COVID-19 pandemic, but federal support for universal school meals expires this summer and the federal child tax credit expired in December of 2021.

It is estimated that continuing universal school meals would cost the state approximately $30 million per year. The Vermont child tax credit would cost approximately $50 million annually to provide a $1,200 benefit for children under the age of six. 

The debate in the statehouse has quickly zeroed in on whether to raise taxes in a year the state is supported by unprecedented federal funding and significant surpluses in both the General Fund and Education Fund. Funding proposals have ranged from applying taxes to sugar sweetened beverages and candy to implementing a “cloud tax,” that would tax online software and services.

The latter has met with significant opposition from Vermont’s tech and broader business communities, which view the proposal as counterproductive to a sector that is growing economic development and jobs in the state. Another option on the table is to fund the programs via the Education Fund, which would have an impact on state property taxes. 

It remains to be seen how the tax proposals will sugar out, and Governor Phil Scott has already signaled opposition to raising taxes. It is likely the debate will become more contentious in the coming weeks. 

On Wednesday the House concurred with the Senate’s amendments to H.722, the Legislature’s decennial legislative redistricting bill, sending the legislation on Thursday to Governor Scott’s desk, where he is expected to sign the bill. 

On Friday the Senate gave final approval to S.286, the pension bill. This legislation goes a long way to address the over $3 billion deficit in the state’s public employee retirement fund. The bill heads to the House next. Because much of this work has been agreed to between the two chambers already, it’s not expected to linger in the House long before heading to the Governor’s desk for his signature.

Another notable development this week was the Senate’s failure to override Governor Scott’s veto of H.361, a bill that would amend the town of Brattleboro’s charter to allow teenagers as young as 16 to vote in local elections.

The House had previously voted to override the veto. The Democrats control the Senate by a 23-7 margin and the bill originally passed the Senate by a 20-9 margin. 20 votes would be needed to override the veto in the Senate so it seemed possible that the Senate could join the House in overriding the veto.

However, six Democrats joined six Republicans to sustain the governor’s veto and thus the override vote failed 15-12.

Leonine Public Affairs is a government affairs and strategic communications consultant located in Montpelier. They publish a weekly update during the legislative session.

Categories: Legislation

6 replies »

  1. “Free, free!! Everything is free”! Remember those words from Communist Bernie Sanders?? Well, I guess this shows to go ya – NOTHING in life is “free” at all. Looks as though the taxpayers are paying it out the wazoo’s as usual, after all.

  2. Many families on “free” are very well off. Nice cars, homes, big vacations, seasons pass at Bolton / Pico / Etc. Don’t let ’em fool ya.

  3. If you can’t feed your children, maybe you should give them up and don’t have any more. Now, taxpayers have to feed other peoples children as well as pay for their education and whatever else the state gives them for free through welfare while seniors struggle to heat their homes, buy food and gas and pay their taxes. There are no golden geese or money trees in Vermont and the people are broke thank to the legislature that just spends, spends, spends bankrupting the state and the people who are not trust fund transplants from other places.

  4. Anything they can do to make us dependents. I wonder if the state gets an IRS deduction for each one?

  5. Why on earth should my hard earned limited income go for paying for free lunch for children from families that earn significantly more than I do? I don’t get it. If the family qualifies for free lunch due to low income I’m ok with that. Everyone else can pay for lunch or bring it from home! I’m so sick of all the “freebies “ our legislators vote for; they’re NOT free as WE have to pay for it!

Leave a Reply