Legislator Perspectives

Galfetti: Bait and switch

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

by Gina Galfetti

Has anyone else wondered why the Global Warming Solutions Act never solved anything? Indeed, from day one the Act was doomed to fail. Climate change is indeed very real; however, initiatives proposed in the GWSA were never going to have any measurable effect on the problem of carbon emissions, and when it was combined with the Clean Heat Standard and the EV mandate, the Majority appears to have had an agenda that missed the mark.

The fact of the matter is the quickest way to reduce carbon emissions and save low- and middle-income folks money would be to invest in weatherization programs. Vermont has some of the oldest housing stock in the nation, and weatherizing homes is the fastest way to reduce emissions significantly while at the same time reducing both fossil fuel reliance and lowering electric bills.

And when one starts peeling back the layers of the onion a bit further, I find it even more concerning that when you take a drive around and look to see who has solar panels, shiny EVs, and heat pumps, it is readily apparent that many low-income folks got left out of the mix. Indeed, the folks who were able to make the investments in solar and electrification already had money, and their homes were weatherized as well. That’s why they were able to take advantage of all the subsidies that were given out for solar panels, EVs, and heat pumps, because they had the money for the upfront costs. Folks who were living paycheck to paycheck while property taxes exploded were never in the running to cash in.

And what exactly did the promotion of solar, and specifically net metering, achieve for low- and middle-income folks? The answer is very clear: when folks with solar panels take advantage of net metering, they sell power back to the grid at the residential retail rate. Great move for them…their bills drop to zero in the summer, and they bank credits to offset their electricity bill in the winter. Good deal, right? Wrong.

The problem with that is that the retail residential rate is way higher than the bulk rate, so what happens to folks without solar living in drafty old homes? You guessed it…their bills go up to offset the premium power they have to buy.

Now, I am not interested in going down a rabbit hole and calling out the folks who got very rich during the green energy boom that was built on a false promise of creating a solution to global warming. The information is there if you want to take that dive. But I want to make one thing very clear: when you understand the science behind global warming and you consider that Vermont will have no impact, the money got spent in all the wrong places to help working people and prepare for the inevitable changes that are coming.

You’ve got to ask yourself why. One, if the goal was to reduce carbon, why didn’t we do the thing that would have had the most impact, i.e., weatherize homes? Two, why did we not start investing major amounts of this money in adaptation for the new future that we are headed for? Because if you look at all the models, we are beyond the tipping point, and the major carbon polluters such as China, India, and Indonesia show no sign of letting up; China alone uses 10.5 times more coal than the United States.

Which brings us to three: why are we farming solar when the biggest threat we face to our region from climate change is the mid-Atlantic current shutting down?

I’m not going to dive into the minutiae of that science, but this is the Northeast’s most pressing climate-change problem: think lower temps, more rain, higher sea levels, and world-wide drought elsewhere. Given that scenario, does it really make sense to penalize farmers as we have in Act 181 and Act 59 when you can’t eat solar panels? I think not.

It is time for folks to be more critical of the so-called environmentalists in this state, specifically the lobbyists and big donors who pushed this policy through with the help of the wealthy elites in the Majority, and start looking at the realities radical environmental policy has created in the form of land seizure and regressive taxes, and who is really footing the bill.

Let’s start pushing lawmakers to pass legislation that benefits struggling Vermonters who pay taxes and work extremely hard. Let’s make lawmakers invest in adaptation for more flood-resilient infrastructure and communities, and let’s take the heat off of farmers so when things change, as they always do, we are ready and the hard-working folks that make it possible are still living here to help.


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 replies »

  1. Thank you Gina for speaking for those whose “Representation” in the process think they know better than those they are supposed to represent ! We need more like you in Mount Peculiar to actually do OUR bidding !

  2. Representative Galfetti, your summation of the GWSA and all clearly understood impacts of our warming planet is perfect proof the enviro NGO’s agenda is not a plan to save the planet. It is a fantasy with a price tag average Vermonters cannot afford.

    Senators Steven Heffernan and Terry Williams introduced S. 317; an expansion of the OEO Weatherization Assistance Program. It raises the salary of the installers and authorizes WAP to weatherize homes of the lower median income families. It remains on the wall of the Natural Resources and Energy Committee; though, it was the highest recommendation of a straw poll taken last January in the Climate Council.

    Ironic, two Senate Republicans endorsed strengthening WAP without raising the 2 cent fee applied to delivery of heating fuels.

    With a Senate Republican Majority that bill would be voted out of the NRE Committee and passed on to the House where a complementary bill offered by Representative Masland would then go to the Governor for his signature.

    Did Chairwoman Senator Anne Watson see S. 317 as a competitor of the ridiculous H 740 which passed the House and written to reopen the eventual enactment of the Clean Heat Act.

    Democrats are playing a game using wealthy foundations funding those NGOs to raise our home heating costs for no reason except to reward those NGOs for the campaign help the Democratic leadership enjoyed.

  3. Thank you Gina for this excellent article, and also for being willing and able to represent so many of us that do not have any support.
    Sadly, the majority in both the House and Senate are NOT true Vermonters and their intent is to force us out of our homes and property. Case in point is Act 181, but finally a large number of us have sent a message to them. I love it!

  4. Thank you Representative Galfetti for this excellent description of Vermont’s failed energy policies. Republican proposals to repeal or amend these policies have been ignored in numerous committees by the power of the committee’s Democrat chairs.

    One such committee is House Energy and Digital Infrastructure, formerly chaired by Amy Sheldon, who greased the skids for a slew of high cost/low benefit policies, including the infamous Clean Heat Standard. Sheldon was relieved of her chair after Democrats suffered historic losses in 2024, at least in part due to public outrage at the projected increases in heating fuels the bill portended. The supermajority was eliminated and the wall of resistance to Republican ideas began to spring a leak.

    Democrat Kathleen James took over the Committee and kept her finger in the hole in the proverbial dike by refusing to allow Republican proposals to repeal the Clean Heat Standard to be considered. Thankfully James has thrown in the wet towel and has announced she will not be seeking reelection.

    Sheldon meanwhile was appointed to chair the House Environment Committee where she shepherded Act 181 with its similarly infamous Tier 3 and Road Rule provisions that have awakened an army of Vermonters to the loss of their property rights. One might conclude that Sheldon has done enough damage and needs to follow Rep. James down the path of future endeavors.

    Voters then should follow through by electing a few more Republicans so that key committees might be chaired by people who will follow Rep. Galfetti’s common sense vision for Vermont.

All topics and opinions welcome! No mocking or personal criticism of other commenters. No profanity, explicitly racist or sexist language allowed. Real, full names are now required. All comments without real full names will be unapproved or trashed.