Commentary

Benedict: Act 955 kicks school funding can down the road, again

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Chaunce Benedict

Well, there you go! Act 955, the public-school transformation bill, as amended promises “substantial equity…delivered at a cost that parents, voters and taxpayers will value.” Just what will the “transformation” be?

Turning down the verbal volume, there will be…

– Many committees “studying” mergers. Many tens of thousands of hours of meetings. Many paid consultants. No mergers are assured. Will need two + years to study. And, for just the cost of a few hundred thousand dollars.

– A new administrative superstructure of “Cooperative Educational Service Areas”. To do things that are already being done. More efficiently and effectively. For sure. No doubt.

– A “new foundation formula”. Just like the “maps” required by Act 73. Remember those? 

– An effort to enact legislation that expresses clear “intent” related to “career and technical education, special education funding, sparsity, empirically supported secondary student weighting, geographic cost differences, a pre-K funding mechanism, legacy collective bargaining agreements, and capital indebtedness held by school districts.” All ought to be taken care of expediently and with minimal difficulty, right? No question.

– And, reports. Lots of reports. Merger committee facilitator reports. A foundation formula report. A State Board of Education Report. All reports will most certainly be read carefully and taken to heart. These will make a real difference, correct?

– School construction. The funds for it: piece of cake. Money grows on trees.

Anything in here, beyond a few throw away rhetorical phrases, about improving learning, reading, etc.? Please show us.

According to the powers-that-be, all of this will be just exactly what Vermonters say they want. Really? Just who? 

Remember Act 46? Really improved learning and schools, at a cost “Vermonters will support”. Right?  

So now comes Act 955. Another kick of the can down the road? Sadly for Vermont, probably yes.


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Commentary, Education

4 replies »

  1. Optimism: Perhaps this dawdling will give more of the public time to see the folly of having the government run the schooling business; time to finally see that collecting exorbitant amounts of citizen money to run a failed business that teachers and families could do without their “help” .

  2. Chaunce, did you happen to see Senator Heffernan’s proposal for one unified school district, local school boards, school choice and evidenced based instruction? Here’s the link to the VDC story: https://vermontdailychronicle.com/senator-proposes-school-choice-within-one-statewide-school-district/#comment

    Seems like a much better approach that should get some traction next session, after the November election continues the rebalancing of the legislature.

    • Steve, thank you for the referral and link to this story. Sen. Heffernan’s plan has great potential. Really like the vision combining choice, promoting local involvement, streamlined administrative entity.

      Makes sense to see what comes of the election – perhaps it is just as well to not have an all-encompassing plan nailed down too tightly at this point. It was really disheartening to see the Act 73 follow up be politically hijakcked and derailed, but there just might be another chapter or two – better chapters! – to be written in this story. Hope so. – Chaunce

All topics and opinions welcome! No mocking or personal criticism of other commenters. No profanity, explicitly racist or sexist language allowed. Real, full names are now required. All comments without real full names will be unapproved or trashed.