Public Safety

Waterbury woman accused of fraudulently obtaining $40,000 from local aid organizations

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

A Waterbury woman is facing multiple charges after allegedly defrauding three Waitsfield charitable organizations out of approximately $40,000 by falsely claiming financial hardship, according to the Vermont State Police.

Authorities say Amanda Haskins, 37, used multiple aliases to request financial assistance for overdue rent payments from the Mad River Valley Community Fund, the Mad River Valley Interfaith Council, and the Community Action Service Team. The fraudulent activity was first reported on December 16, 2024, when the Mad River Valley Interfaith Council contacted state police about a suspicious funding request.

A subsequent investigation revealed that Haskins had already received substantial funds from multiple organizations under false pretenses. Police say she repeatedly misrepresented her financial situation to secure financial aid, resulting in tens of thousands of dollars in losses for the charitable groups.

On February 26, Haskins voluntarily arrived at the Berlin Barracks, where she was taken into custody. She was processed and later released with a citation to appear in Washington County Superior Court, Criminal Division, on April 10.

Haskins faces charges of false personation, false pretenses, and false statements of financial ability. Further details will be made available once court documents are filed following her arraignment.

Authorities urge individuals and organizations to exercise caution when providing financial assistance and to report any suspicious activity to law enforcement.


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Public Safety

1 reply »

  1. This is a good example of why cutting federal funds to NGO/non-profits is good for the taxpaying public. Many of these organizations do NOT do proper vetting of their beneficiaries, and seem to exist only to benefit themselves and make their private contributors feel good about themselves. If these groups exist on private contributions only, they may be more choosy about whom they assist, as bad publicity like this will affect their donors’ decisions. The federal gov’t just doles it out indiscriminately…or at least they used to. MAGA.