By Michael Bielawski
The House Committee on Agriculture, Food Resiliency, and Forestry has “United Nations” referenced in at least six committee documents, continuing a trend of the global organization’s influence in the Green Mountain State.
Influencing Agriculture
The “Food Security in Vermont” policy document put together by the Vermont Sustainable Jobs Fund references the United Nations a few times, including in its opening statement.
“Our Shared Goal: In 2035, all Vermonters will be food secure. The Vermont Food Security Roadmap to 2035 guides our way to that future. As defined by the United Nations, food security is “when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life,” it states.
Recently Vermont implemented “Universal School Meals” which some pundits think derived from a U.N. initiative.
On the United Nations webpage, it states, “The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the World Food Programme (WFP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) committed to assisting the School Meals Coalition in which over 60 countries envision a nutritious meal in school for every child in need by 2030.”
The food security document also has the phrase “equity” 11 times. It states, “As noted in the Racial Equity in the Vermont Food System brief, racial inequities in Vermont’s food system, including the disproportionate rates of food insecurity experienced by Black, Indigenous, and People of Color, are rooted in the history of our nation and state.”
Influencing Biodiversity
In H. 126, “An act relating to community resilience and biodiversity protection” the bill’s findings have a section titled “According to the United Nations” and lists the various damages to the planet that the U.N. deems the result of human activity.
These include, “one million species of plants and animals are threatened with extinction” and “human activity has altered almost 75 percent of the Earth’s surface, squeezing wildlife and nature into ever-smaller natural areas of the planet.”
Sponsors include Rep. Amy Sheldon, D-Middlebury, and others.
Also dealing with biodiversity, the Senate Committee on Agriculture in January of 2023 submitted a report to the General Assembly titled “Payment for Ecosystem Services and Soil Health Working Group Final Report”. It includes four references to the U.N.
It also implies that carbon reduction efforts will be factored into ecosystem management policies.
It states, “Still, some studies offer useful frameworks for comparing and selecting tools, such as one process defined by the World Bank and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). This process recommends progressing from predefined criteria (aim, geographical zone/application, available data, time, and skills) before then identifying 1) land use activity being measured, 2) land use changes to be accounted for, and 3) greenhouse gases, carbon pools, and leakage.”
In another mention, it states “The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations recommends that soil biodiversity measurements should be ‘sensitive enough to reflect the influence of management and climate on long-term changes in soil quality but not be so sensitive as to be influenced by short-term weather patterns and robust enough not to give false alarms.’”
Honorable mentions:
“United Nations” appears briefly in other documents the committee has looked at. It’s once in a document titled “Right to Repair Laws are Constitutional,” from Nebraska’s Office of the Attorney General.
It’s mentioned in a document subtitled “Building increased resilience in Vermont’s food system through agricultural surplus management” by Theresa Snow of Salvation Farms in Morrisville.
When The Truck and Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA) submitted testimony on a bill dealing with H. 81 concerning repair policies for agricultural equipment, the U.N. was referenced once.
The author is a writer for the Vermont Daily Chronicle
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Legislation, State Government
Abound????
When did we become the first colony of the United Nations?
We are completely controlled by them…and dirtbag…
lobbyists
NGO’s
PAC’s
PLanned Parenthood
BLM
Antifa
VNRC
VPIRG…..
non-profits
lobbyist and government operatives hiding as non-profits
notice the people, the citizens of Vermont have nothing to do with the levers of power?…..
We have!
Poppy bush signed us up for this back in 1992, Agenda 21, the united nations agenda for the 21st Century.
Our Republic has been completely taken over. Please go back to sleep now and eat your bugs, don’t forget to be happy.
Ever notice the UN map depicts a flat earth? – DOH!
VT powers that be signed a contract deal to do the UN’s 17 sustainable steps by 2030 date time certain. Question: where is that underlaying public document published that seeded all the legislation? By going back to the underlying agreement that acts as a contract, we return the core text. Produce this document publicly and publish it in one place so we can all read and review the contract agreement and terms. Then we the people can see what the powers have obliged us to including any penalties and repercussions by the globalists or other should VT not pay up the designated share per agreement.
When government is your god, the promise is oppression.
You will know these Government Manipulating Organizations (GMO) by how they justify their existence.
Established in 1924, the National League of Cities (NLC) was founded as one of the early synthetic political subdivisions of government in the United States. Based in Washington D. C. there would be many more Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) to follow, both in the United States, and around the world.
After its creation, NLC began to lobby Congress as an American Advocacy Group, with a broad focus on Municipal issues.
Vermont would also recognize this concept of Central Planning through advocacy in 1967 with the enactment of Act 334, the Vermont Planning & Development Act. This would usher in two synthetic political subdivisions, the Vermont League of Cities and Towns (VLCT) and eventually eleven Regional Planning Commissions, serving over 260 Municipalities throughout the state.
Then in1968 Governor Dean Davis created the Governors Commission on Environmental Control. Which in January of 1970 made recommendations that included establishing statewide Zoning, using Act 250 as a catalyst.
From that point on, Zoning became one of the key components for completing the closed circle of power forming a new Public, Private Partnership into a parallel system of control.
For without the peoples consent for Zoning Bylaws, the circle would be broken. But, with them behind it, a police state for compliance could be established. And Vermonters would be conditioned slowly to relax their grip on the idea of self government.
Over time we have allowed the creation of a synthetic support systems to guide and persuade state and municipal legislators. A system of planning & development, that promises financial aid, legal advice, and an advocacy partnership network, providing services for a fee to members.
Lawmakers in subscribing communities are conditioned to seek advice from these support networks, then select from a menu of multiple choice provided them. But what most don’t realize is, “No” is never an option once you are a participating member in this system!
This closed system of advocacy uses compartmentalized manipulation, that has the ability to almost exclusively monopolizes our legislative agendas.
All while creating legalese that blends in theory with our founding principles, yet frustrates the will of the people, making litigation to protect their sovereignty impossible to afford.
Thank you so much for laying out the game plan and what is going on within our counrty, well done, well done.