Commentary

Krowinski: H.289 provides ‘price stability and affordability’ for ratepayers

House Speaker Jill Krowinski, House leadership and bill sponsors Tuesday March 26 provided an update on a few pieces of key legislation following crossover, a key mid-session deadline in the Vermont Legislature.

“Getting legislation to the floor requires a sustained and thoughtful group effort,” says Speaker Krowinski. “We can only get this hard work done if everyone’s at the table, ready to collaborate. Our legislative sessions are short, so we have to use every minute to find creative solutions to the big challenges facing our state. Our decisions impact the day-to-day lives of all Vermonters, and we take that responsibility very seriously.

“State government’s job is to ensure Vermonters can meet their basic needs and have the tools and resources they need to build a stable life for themselves and their families. We invest in government because when government functions well, everyone wins. We’re talking about housing and healthcare. Childcare, education and broadband. Supporting our businesses and building our workforce. Building a more flood- and climate-resilient state. Protecting our most vulnerable Vermonters. Public safety, mental health, roads, and bridges — or just making sure that when someone calls a state office, there’s someone to not only answer the call, but to help you solve a problem or get a service you need and deserve.

“This year, building a balanced and responsible budget requires tough choices. We believe in real fiscal responsibility, real long-term progress, and real affordability for every Vermonter in every community. Sometimes this goal requires reducing spending, and sometimes it requires making strategic investments that save everyone money down the road. That’s the approach we bring to every financial decision we make.

“As we work toward wrapping up the FY25 state budget, I look forward to sharing more details on the investments we’re making in top priorities like affordable housing, access to healthcare, public safety, and economic development.” 

Renewable Energy Standard (RES) – H.289

The House passed the updated Renewable Energy Standard Act (RES) on March 21st by a convincing 99-39 roll-call vote. The legislation marks a significant milestone in Vermont’s progress towards a renewable energy future. If enacted, the legislation accelerates Vermont’s transition to 100% renewable energy by 2030 while supporting expanded in-state and regional renewables, ensuring price stability and affordability for utilities and ratepayers, and implementing safeguards against double-counting of renewable energy credits. The bill is a result of collaborative efforts with Vermonters, utilities, energy developers, environmentalists, housing advocates and legislators. After weeks of testimony, consensus was reached on the feasibility of this goal.

“In passing H.289, we affirm our state’s pivotal role in shaping impactful environmental policies that resonate far beyond our borders,” said Rep. Amy Sheldon, Chair of the House Committee on Environment and Energy. “While Vermont’s greenhouse gas emissions may seem modest on a global scale, our commitment to renewable energy serves as a beacon for others. This updated standard, tailored to meet the unique needs of our utilities, not only promotes affordability but fosters local energy production, enhancing community resilience. By championing this legislation, we signal our resolve to break free from fossil-fuel dependency, showcasing Vermont’s dedication to a sustainable future.” 

“H.289 updates the RES at a time of ongoing volatility in global fossil-fuel markets and increasingly frequent and severe impacts on the electric grid from our changing climate,” said Rep. Laura Sibilia, Vice Chair of the House Committee on Energy and Environment. “Vermonters want more renewables, and they deserve stable and predictable pricing. This bill delivers those goals, while offering flexibility for the different types of utilities that operate in Vermont. It’s a consensus proposal that’s supported by utilities, environmental advocates and industry, and it respects the priorities Vermonters have identified as important to our energy future: affordability, reliability, reducing carbon emissions and increasing renewables.”

Vermont Data Privacy Act – H.121

On March 22, the Vermont House of Representatives passed H.121 with a unanimous vote (139-0). The Vermont Data Privacy Act gives individuals the ability to access, delete and correct the information that businesses have about them, as well as to opt out of the use of personal data for targeted advertising, data sales, and significant automated profiling decisions. It adds affirmative opt-in consent requirements around the collection and processing of sensitive personal data — including information about health status, demographics, and precise geolocation. 

Under the leadership of Chair Rep. Michael Marcotte, the Vermont House Committee on Commerce & Economic Development heard a diverse range of perspectives from across stakeholder groups and sectors in order to draft a protective, but largely technology and industry-neutral proposal. “Consumer protection is of the utmost importance in the State of Vermont,” says Chair Marcotte. “With H.121, the committee continues its tradition of being a leader in consumer protection and safeguarding data privacy.” 

As the uses of big data and advanced analytics expand, and Vermonters’ personal information is increasingly commodified without explicit consent, it is crucial that we establish a set of rules that balance the needs of business operation with consumer protection. Rep. Monique Priestley, who reported the bill on the floor, said “By embracing this act, we have the opportunity to safeguard our personal freedoms, ensure equitable treatment in the digital landscape, and reclaim control over our digital footprints. It is crucial that we protect Vermonters in the face of unchecked technological expansion and to secure a future where data privacy is not just a privilege, but a fundamental right.”

Updating Vermont’s EMS System – H.622

In response to the critical needs of Vermont’s Emergency Medical Services (EMS) sector, H.622 aims to address workforce issues, governance sustainability, and fair payment for services rendered by dedicated EMS providers. This bill also provides $300,000 annually to support EMS training, ensuring a reduction in the number of volunteers who have to cover their own training costs, thereby promoting equity and enhancing the quality of services provided.

“We all expect an ambulance to come when we call 9-1-1, but because current reimbursement rates don’t cover the full cost of service delivery, EMS services are struggling to keep pace with the needs of our communities,” said the main sponsor of the bill, Rep. Katherine Sims. “This bill takes a huge step forward to addressing these challenges and setting up a more sustainable EMS system for Vermont.”

“As a critical part of health care, EMS providers across the State strengthen our communities during times of crisis,” said bill reporter Rep. Lucy Boyden. “Vermont’s EMS system is a patchwork with unbalanced funding, which causes volunteer retention issues, gaps in services, and overlapping service areas. Support for H.622 provides significant resources to our EMS providers, their training, and best practices.”


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Commentary, Press Release

9 replies »

  1. Sorry,…. one flag, one nation.

    If you are seeking to continue to fragment the country into meaningless pieces keep down this path.

    Despite splinter groups with splinter agendas, we remain a nation of many with many agendas but having a common denominator. Lose sight of this common core and we revert to a special interest mob.

  2. The All Volunteer Ambulance where I live would greatly benefit if the employers would allow their employees to take the calls received while they are working. It would make a huge difference.

  3. every one will be equal at the unemployment line//// it will give you a lot of time to think about the states investments///////////

  4. “While Vermont’s greenhouse gas emissions may seem modest on a global scale, our commitment to renewable energy serves as a beacon for others.” Thanks for admitting it is primarily virtue signaling at taxpayer expense.

  5. Speaker Krowinski. “Our legislative sessions are short, so we have to use every minute to find creative solutions to the big challenges” Yea just think how much faster you could bring the citizens of this state to our knees if you were in session year round !
      Speaker Krowinski. “We believe in real fiscal responsibility, real long-term progress, and real affordability for every Vermonter in every community.” Your insane belief that committing to “renewable” energy for everything from our choice of the type of vehicle we drive to our choice of how we heat our homes suggests there is a higher but questionable agenda that you are pushing. How much money do you people have invested in the “renewable energy ” ripoff  ? If any of you have any money at all invested in this sham, would that constitute a conflict of interest ? You all need to go back to the roots of statesmanship, and try being public servants. The fake altruistic facade that you people project is so glaring that it makes me want to puke ! I really feel sorry for anybody that buys your line of B.S. as they are truely ignorant.

  6. By championing this legislation, we signal our resolve to break free from fossil-fuel dependency, showcasing Vermont’s dedication to ……a sustainable future.” correction

    dedication to the United Nations and Agenda 21. There fixed it for you. …

  7. The Independent Republic of Vermont was founded on January 15th 1777.
    It remained independent until March 4th 1791, when Vermont was admitted to the Union as the 14th member state. We kept our Constitution and laws intact and continued to function as we had when we were an independent Republic.

    For those of us old enough to remember what it means to self govern as a Republic, one story stands out to show how difficult maintaining this form of governance is.
    Upon leaving the Constitutional Convention, Ben Franklin was asked the question, what have we got, a Republic or a Monarchy? He replied, “a Republic if you can keep it”.

    Although the United States was founded as a Constitutional Republic, most people now claim we are a Democracy, or a Democratic Republic.
    So what is the United States of today, a Republic, a Democracy, or a Hybrid of the two?

    Regardless of how you justify an answer for this questions, only one theme seems consistent at this point in our history. Our overall perception of governance is confused about our power structure. Perhaps over time we have unknowingly abandoned the attributes of governing ourselves as a Republic, without ever actually realizing or understanding what is causing us to forfeit so much control over our personal lives. Why does manipulation in our name never seem to stop?

    It might surprise you to know two forms of government can exist in parallel, pretending to be one in the same. However, eventually the one you think you have, becomes only a memory, and the one you actually endure, is what you are left with.
    It appears Ben Franklin’s assessment was correct, we could not keep our Republic.

    So what happens to our Democracy, when our Republic is no more, will Democracy then transition into a Dictatorship?
    And what would stop it, without a Republic to balance the power structure?
    After nearly 250 years, most people think we are a Democracy, but the real question is, how much of our Republic is still functional anymore?

    A great deal has changed structurally since our founding, however even if you look closely you may not see the closed structure of control camouflaged in plain sight.
    Why you ask, well because a Democratic structure has been operating in parallel over a long period of time. Creating legalese that blends in theory with our founding principles, yet frustrates the peoples will, and their ability to afford litigation to protect their sovereignty. Today we have a blended coalition governing us. It consists of Corporations both public and private as well as for-profit and non-profit organizations. Their boundaries are blurred and their agendas are heavily lobbied. Such is our dilemma!

    So before you lament the loss of Democracy or pray if must be protected at all costs, consider what your idea of Democracy has done to our Republic. Oh! You didn’t know, we were once a Republic?

    If you are setting at the table of collaboration, and don’t understand the concept of our Republic, then all is in vein!

  8. Although studiously ignored by Climate Alarmist thinking, the Water in the atmosphere either as Water Vapour or as Clouds is the main Greenhouse Gas, accounting for roughly 85% – 95% of the total warming effect or about ~30°C of the estimated ~+33°C Greenhouse effect.  The Greenhouse effect of Water in the atmosphere varies according to latitude, local climate and local humidity roughly within that range. Mankind has no influence on the amount or distribution of water in the atmosphere. 

    Water vapor (clouds) has at least a hundred times greater warming effect on Earth’s temperature than all other GHGs combined.

  9. Price stability like you guys did with our educational system?

    Seriously?