|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Can our State break free from Federal dependency?

by Dave Soulia, on FYIVT.com
The first step in fixing a problem is admitting that you have a problem. Vermont has a spending problem. The state spends more money relative to its economy than any other state in the nation, with state and local government expenditures totaling 29.4% of its Gross State Product (GSP)—far above the national average of 18.23% (US Government Spending). To make matters worse, Vermont relies heavily on federal funding to balance its books, with 25-30% of its $8.6 billion budget coming from federal transfers (USAFacts).
This level of spending, combined with a relatively small economy—just $45.4 billion in GDP (Federal Reserve Economic Data)—has made Vermont one of the most financially dependent states in the union. Tackling this issue requires acknowledging the state’s fiscal realities and crafting solutions that reduce spending, grow the economy, and relieve the tax burden on already overburdened residents.
The Difference Between GDP and GSP
To understand Vermont’s challenges, it’s important to distinguish between Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Gross State Product (GSP). While GDP measures the total economic output of a nation, GSP focuses on the economic activity generated within a single state. Vermont’s GSP represents its slice of the national economy, and with such a small slice, every dollar spent by the state weighs more heavily on its overall output compared to larger states.
States with more robust economies, like Texas or Florida, can sustain lower government spending-to-GSP ratios—closer to 15-17%—because their larger and more diverse economic bases generate substantial revenue. Vermont, on the other hand, spends like a much larger state without the economy to match.
How Vermont Compares
Compared to other states, Vermont’s spending habits and federal dependency stand out. Alaska, the second-highest spender relative to GSP, clocks in at 25.96%, and many other small states hover in the low-to-mid 20s. States like New Hampshire, with a similar population size, spend far less as a percentage of GSP and rely less on federal support.
- Spending as a percentage of GSP:
- Vermont: 29.4%
- Alaska: 25.96%
- U.S. average: 18.23%
- GDP (2024 estimates):
- Vermont: $45.4 billion
- Alaska: $67.8 billion
What separates Vermont from its peers is not only its spending but also its limited revenue-generating capacity. States like Alaska offset their high spending with revenues from natural resources like oil. Vermont, by contrast, relies heavily on taxes and federal aid, leaving it more vulnerable to economic and political shifts.
A Path Forward: Fiscal Solvency for Vermont
Admitting Vermont’s fiscal challenges is only the first step. The state must craft a strategy to reduce spending and grow its economy without further burdening taxpayers.
1. Streamline Government Spending
The state needs a full review of government operations to identify inefficiencies and eliminate waste. Modernizing outdated administrative systems, consolidating duplicative services, and focusing on programs that deliver measurable results can reduce costs without cutting essential services.
2. Ease Regulatory Burdens
Vermont’s regulatory environment often discourages business growth. Simplifying permitting processes and reducing bureaucratic hurdles can attract industries like manufacturing and technology. These sectors bring jobs and revenue while diversifying Vermont’s economic base.
3. Encouraging green manufacturing
Ventures, such as producing eco-friendly packaging or renewable energy components—aligns with Vermont’s environmental ethos and economic goals.
4. Promote Regenerative Agriculture
Vermont’s agriculture sector is uniquely positioned for growth. By adopting regenerative practices that enhance soil health and reduce costs, farmers can produce high-value products like organic dairy, vegetables, and maple syrup. These goods command premium prices in national and international markets.
5. Tap Into Carbon Credit Markets
Vermont’s abundant forests are an untapped resource for economic growth. By selling carbon offsets to corporations aiming to reduce emissions, Vermont can generate revenue while preserving its natural environment. Programs that incentivize private landowners to maintain forest cover also enhance biodiversity and support tourism.
6. Energy Efficiency and Cost Reduction
Programs to improve energy efficiency—like weatherization initiatives and appliance rebates—reduce utility bills for residents and businesses. Savings can circulate through the economy, boosting spending in other areas. These initiatives can often be funded through federal grants or partnerships, minimizing costs to the state.
Rebuilding Fiscal Independence
The first step toward solving Vermont’s fiscal problems is clear-eyed honesty about its current position. With spending outpacing economic output and heavy reliance on federal funding, Vermont risks becoming permanently dependent on outside support. By cutting waste, easing regulations, and fostering growth in sustainable industries, the state can chart a path toward self-sufficiency.
The question isn’t whether Vermont has a problem—it’s if the state is prepared to admit it?

Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Commentary, News Analysis, State Government










Yes. Vermont has a spending problem… a government spending problem. But that’s only the half of it. The return on spending is not only negligible, it’s a negative factor. What we invest in is actually decreasing our standard of living.
Yes, we can play the ‘carbon credit’ game. But it’s based on a false premise. CO2 is *not* a problem. In fact, CO2 is a ‘trace gas’, it accounts for only 1/400th of a percent of the earth’s atmosphere. And any increase in CO2 attributed to human activity is only 1/5th of that trace total. Never mind that CO2 is one of the most beneficial compounds on the planet supporting all life. We should stop wasting our time AND our money.
Now consider education. Vermont spends more than $30,000 per student per year in its PK through 12th grade public school monopoly. And for that, fewer than half of Vermont’s high school graduates meet minimum grade level standards. We should stop wasting our time AND our money.
And healthcare..?? Consider Vermont’s healthcare, as governed by the Green Mountain Care Board, and that Vermont has the second highest per-capita health care expenditures in New England, outpacing that of the US and New England.
Meanwhile, VT Digger reports that ‘As UVM Health Network cuts services in Vermont, it expands in New York.’
“The recent cuts on this side of the lake, administrators say, were due solely to the actions of the Green Mountain Care Board, a state regulator that capped network hospital budgets and ordered UVM Medical Center to reduce its charges to private health insurers earlier this year.”
“Owen Foster, the chair of the Green Mountain Care Board, declined to comment, saying he did not know the details…”
He didn’t know? Go figure. We should stop wasting our time AND our money.
The point is that ‘a full review of government operations to identify inefficiencies and eliminate waste’ is a waste of time. It’s not possible to make a silk purse from a sow’s ear. What is needed is LESS government and MORE free markets.
“When government– in pursuit of good intentions tries to rearrange the economy, legislate morality, or help special interests, the costs come in inefficiency, lack of motivation, and loss of freedom.” – Milton Friedman
Yes, VT has a spending problem, that is inherently funded by your taxes, but it can be fixed when these inept so-called elected officials are voted out by its citizens, the money tree for progressive legislation that has burdened you financially !!
Wake up people, hold their feet to the fire, you live within your means so why aren’t these elected officials held to the same responsibility as it’s citizens?
Vermont does not have to worry about spending any money. When King Philip the Scott 1st Eunuch King of Castrati and his Commiecrat progressive friends in the legislature that enable him and voted to put him in office doesn’t cooperate with Trumps border and sanctuary city/state policies, school transgender policies, Title 9 womans sports policies and getting rid of DEI and transgenderism and wokeism in our schools and gets all their federal funding cut or denied, well as the Muddy Waters song goes, “you can’t spend what you ain’t got, you can’t lose what you ain’t never had.
Or will King Philip the Scott 1st Eunuch King of Castrati go to Mar-A-Lago for a Big Mac and kiss the ring of the True King.
(Personally, I don’t think Trump would ever invite him to Mar-A-Lago. The closest Phil would get would be talking to a low-level aide on the phone)
Without federal funding the state of Vermont is????????????????
Once again my litany of State of Vermont waste……”Deputy Commissioner” ……”Assistant Director” ……”Deputy Chief”……..”Assistant Supervisor”. If they need deputies and assistants then they cannot handle the job, get someone who can.