|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|

by Dave Soulia, for FYIVT.com
The high cost of living in Vermont isn’t driven by any one law or policy. Instead, it’s the cumulative weight of countless costs—fees, surcharges, and mandates—that drive up prices for goods and services while shrinking Vermonters’ paychecks. Businesses face mounting expenses, from payroll taxes and compliance costs to state-specific contributions like paid family leave and childcare programs. To stay viable, these costs are passed on to consumers, raising prices across the board.
At the same time, employees are hit with deductions that chip away at their take-home pay. Social Security, Medicare, state income taxes, and Vermont-specific contributions leave workers with less disposable income to handle rising prices. This creates a vicious cycle: as goods and services become more expensive, shrinking paychecks make those costs feel even higher.
Understanding the interplay between these forces is key to addressing the rising cost of living in Vermont, where residents often feel stuck in an ever-tightening squeeze.
The Double Burden on Employers and Employees
Vermont’s employers face a long list of mandated expenses: payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare, state unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, and contributions to programs like paid family leave. These are just the universal costs. Many industries, especially those tied to manufacturing, construction, or hospitality, face additional layers of regulatory compliance fees and environmental mandates. For small business owners in particular, these costs can represent a significant percentage of overall operating expenses.
To stay afloat, businesses pass these costs on to consumers. That’s why a bag of groceries or a plumber’s hourly rate costs more here than in neighboring states. Vermont’s small population and limited economies of scale amplify this effect, as businesses can’t offset high costs with high volume. Unlike larger markets where higher demand can help dilute expenses, Vermont businesses operate in a more constrained environment, leaving fewer options for absorbing new fees or taxes.
Meanwhile, employees see their paychecks eroded by deductions. Social Security, Medicare, state income taxes, and new Vermont-specific programs like paid family leave and childcare contributions eat into gross wages. The cumulative effect is shrinking take-home pay, which limits Vermonters’ ability to afford the very goods and services that are becoming increasingly expensive. This double burden creates a fragile economic environment where both businesses and consumers feel stretched to their limits.
Why Everything Costs More Here
Vermont’s reliance on imported goods is another key factor. Only a small fraction of products sold in the state are made locally, and those that are—such as artisan foods, craft goods, and other Vermont-branded specialties—are often premium-priced. For most necessities, Vermont depends on shipments from larger hubs like New York and Massachusetts. This reliance on imports adds transportation costs, particularly for rural areas, where delivery expenses are often higher due to distance and low population density.
Local businesses face additional challenges when competing with online retailers like Amazon and Walmart. Every product purchased online is one less sold at a brick-and-mortar store. Reduced sales volume forces these stores to raise prices to cover fixed costs like rent, utilities, and wages. This creates a catch-22: as prices rise, more consumers turn to online shopping for savings, exacerbating the problem. The end result is a gradual erosion of Vermont’s retail landscape and fewer affordable options for those who want to shop locally.
Transportation costs play an outsized role as well. With its rural geography and seasonal weather challenges, Vermont’s logistics network often struggles to deliver goods efficiently. Rising fuel prices and weather-related delays can add additional layers of expense to the already-high cost of moving products into the state.
The Feedback Loop of Rising Costs
This dual burden—higher costs for businesses and reduced paychecks for workers—feeds into a self-perpetuating cycle:
- Employers Face Higher Costs: New mandates and taxes increase operating expenses, which businesses offset by raising prices.
- Consumers Pay More: Higher prices make everyday goods and services less affordable for residents.
- Workers Have Less to Spend: Shrinking paychecks leave employees struggling to keep up with rising costs, further limiting their spending power.
- Business Pressures Grow: Reduced consumer spending puts additional strain on local businesses, leading to more closures or price hikes.
This cycle is particularly pronounced in Vermont, where the state’s rural nature and small-scale economy make it harder for businesses and consumers to adapt to rising costs.
A Way Forward
Addressing Vermont’s high cost of living will require bold changes. Reducing fees, simplifying regulations, and offering tax relief could ease the burden on businesses and encourage investment. Revitalizing manufacturing with targeted incentives and streamlined permitting could help Vermont produce more locally, reducing reliance on imports and creating jobs. For example, tax breaks for new manufacturers or grants for Vermont-based startups could help reignite industries lost decades ago.
Supporting local businesses is also crucial. Campaigns encouraging residents to “buy Vermont” and creating tools to help small businesses compete online could help keep money circulating in the local economy. Investments in infrastructure, like improving transportation networks or expanding high-speed broadband access, could also reduce costs for both businesses and consumers.
The state must also take a hard look at policies that add incremental costs. While initiatives like paid family leave and childcare support are valuable, their long-term economic impacts should be weighed carefully. Vermont needs to balance its progressive ideals with the economic realities facing businesses and households.
The Bigger Picture
The problem isn’t any one law or fee—it’s the accumulation of costs that makes life in Vermont so expensive. Every new mandate pushes employers to raise prices and employees to stretch their paychecks thinner. Without change, this mountain of costs will only grow, making Vermont increasingly unaffordable for both residents and businesses.
However, with thoughtful reform, a focus on local production, and targeted investments, Vermont has an opportunity to reverse this trend. By addressing the root causes of its economic challenges, the state can move toward a more sustainable and affordable future for all.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Commentary









In my case a cost to do any shopping is high. VT doesn’t want business. In a very rural area Round trips are Walmart’s in Hindsdale NH 52 miles, Keene NH 84 miles, Claremont NH 84 miles, Bennington 100 miles. The fuel expenses alone are costly, then there’s oil changes, tire wear, have to keep mileage down or insurance rates increase. It sucks. Other states allow for a Veteran to get a discount on property taxes, not VT. An VDC article mentioned how two female legislators blocked any small benefit a Veteran gets. Yet we protect them and their way of life. One was from Brattleboro, total stupidity. VT doesn’t need to be this way. In St Albans, it took eleven years for Walmart get approval to locate there benefiting the locals. Stupid.
Recently property taxes increased some 10%, land values increased to get more money for the education system. Cost per pupal is about the highest in the US. So many negatives. Stupid.
Hope my comment leads others to vent.
The old saying on Government spending was “A million here, a million there, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money”, now replacing the million with Billion and soon to be Trillion! Coming from where?
“However, with thoughtful reform, a focus on local production, and targeted investments, Vermont has an opportunity to reverse this trend. By addressing the root causes of its economic challenges, the state can move toward a more sustainable and affordable future for all.”
The root causes are the elected individuals in Montpelier with their respective heads “in the sand”. Time to throw out the trash.
“The wisest and soundest method of solving our tax problem is through economy…The collection of any taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to the public welfare, is only a species of legalized larceny. Under this republic the rewards of industry belong to those who earn them. The only constitutional tax is the tax which ministers to public necessity. The property of the country belongs to the people of the country. Their title is absolute. They do not support any privileged class; they do not need to maintain great military forces; they ought not to be burdened with a great array of public employees…. I am opposed to extremely high rates, because they produce little or no revenue, because they are bad for the country, and, finally, because they are wrong. We cannot finance the country, we cannot improve social conditions, through any system of injustice, even if we attempt to inflict it upon the rich. Those who suffer the most harm will be the poor. This country believes in prosperity. It is absurd to suppose that it is envious of those who are already prosperous. The wise and correct course to follow in taxation and all other economic legislation is not to destroy those who have already secured success but to create conditions under which everyone will have a better chance to be successful.” Calvin Coolidge, March 4, 1925 Inauguration Address.
Interesting to note, Calvin left office March of 1929. The stock market crashed October 1929 after six months of a “speculative boom.” “By August 1929, brokers were routinely lending small investors more than two-thirds of the face value of the stocks that they were buying. Over $8.5 billion was out on loan, more than the entire amount of currency circulating in the United States at the time.” Wow, sounds familiar – booms and bubbles – wash, rinse, repeat….reset time!