Republished from Lake Champlain Chamber Advocacy Newsletter
Friday was Crossover Day, the last day for committees to pass out policy-related bills in order to be considered for passage this year. Bills with strong ‘money’ considerations face their own Friday, March 22 Crossover.
Here’s a quick view of where some legislation landed on Friday.
Tougher bail, conditions of release – A bill addressing violations of conditions of release, bail, and supervision of those awaiting trial, S.195, passed out of the Senate Committee on Judiciary Friday morning.
The bill is considered a promising opportunity to address some of Vermont’s most egregious re-offenders who commit many crimes while still awaiting trial. It allows judges to consider public safety rather than just flight risk when considering a defendant’s pre-trial status.
PFA ban downgraded to study – The Senate Committee on Health and Welfare passed S.197, requiring a report on November 1 on the who, what, when, and where PFAS should be regulated in the state. The bill originally would have implemented a ban.
Climate superfund passes Senate committee – S.259, a bill aimed at extracting from large fossil fuel corporations the funding needed to respond to, and mitigate, climate-fueled severe weather passed the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously.
A study on regional and county governance, S.159, passed out of the Senate Committee on Government Operations on a unanimous vote. Later additions to the bill created a legislative committee and a technical advisory committee.
A bill requiring the disclosure of salaries in job postings, H.704, passed the House Committee on General and Housing. The bill is similar to that which was passed in Colorado, which resulted in national employers not hiring residents of that state.
House, Senate housing bills on collision course – The House Committee on Energy and the Environment passed H.687 last week, a bill proposing major changes to Act 250 and land use regulation. The bill has been pitted against S.311 in the Senate.
Both bills seek to create a tiered structure of Act 250 jurisdiction, however, the Senate version has a focus on housing creation while the House version has an emphasis on environmental protection.
The House version is more prescriptive of these new tiers with an aggressive timeline that means the state will need to wait years to clear the way for urban areas, while the Senate version creates interim tiers to more rapidly deploy housing in areas that require less Act 250 jurisdiction.
The House Ways and Means Committee passed their miscellaneous tax bill which officially pours cold water on any effort to add a tax unrealized capital gains, as the issue is kicked to a study committee.
Varying VEGI bills – Both the House and the Senate moved legislation on the Vermont Employment Growth Incentive Program this week with different aims.
The House, in H.10, looked to extend the sunset on the program two years, reduce the number of individuals on the governing committee, and required a study on what a future iteration of it might be. The Senate sought to eliminate the sunset and allow the program to exist in perpetuity. It also established language to proceed with a VEGI application as a forgivable loan instead of its current tax award.
Human Services reorganization – The Senate Government Operations Committee passed S.183, creating a study tasked with reenvisioning the Agency of Human Services structure, analyzing options, and proposing recommendations by February 1, 2025. This amends the original bill, which aimed to divide the agency into two separate entities.
Data privacy – The House Committee on Commerce and Economic Development is still looking to wrap up work on a data privacy bill this week. The Committee has heard numerous concerns from a vast array of stakeholders that were not addressed, primarily concerns around a private right of action.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Legislation









s159 regional and county governance//// there is no such thing called regional government/// looks like another make work program for non producers/// federal/// state/// county/// town/// city/// no regional/// sounds like the metro 13 13 program///
s259 climate superfund/// looking forward for higher fuel costs along with my 20 percent increase in my property taxes///
regional/// affordable housing bond program/// this is a debt creating operation/// this state is pushing more bonds that will not create low income housing/// remember the state will not default on any bonds/// the tax payers are liable for this debt/// 250,000.00 dollars for a one bedroom apartment is not a good deal///
That makes us 1 step closer to insolvency, doesn’t it.
Regarding S.259 – I recently heard admittance by our government to modifying the weather. NOAA publishes reports, required by Federal law to the Department of Commerce. The reports show use of silver iodide and sodium chloride sprayed into our skies – lots and lots of it. Source: NOAA
“In the late 1940’s and 1950’s many deemed “the deliberate or the inadvertent alteration of atmospheric conditions by human activity”, also known as weather modification, as a promising science of the future. Currently, the most common form of weather modification is cloud seeding, which increases rain or snow, usually for the purpose of increasing the local water supply. Weather modification can also have the goal of preventing damaging weather, such as hail or hurricanes, from occurring.
As part of Public Law 92-205 (1972), all non-Federal weather modification activities must be reported to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, via the NOAA Weather Program Office. Below is a list of these reports and is updated on a quarterly basis.”
https://libguides.library.noaa.gov/weather-climate/weather-modification-project-reports
How much longer do we have to put up with climate change lies and the thievery? The fires are the next lie to be revealed – some all ready see what that is all about as well – what burns and what doesn’t….interesting finds.
Regarding the bill requiring the disclosure of salaries in job postings, H.704. This is waste of time. Most employers do advertise positions with the salary ranges. There are however some positions where the salary ranges are heavily market driven and may not be possible to quote a range. One way around a stupid law is to advertise a position with a very wide salary range and then state that the successful hire will be placed somewhere in the range based on a combination of education and work experience.
👏🏻Yea for the tougher bail and crime bills. A step in the right direction and not the left.
It is so encouraging, but—sad to have to say this—surprising to see bills being put forth and supported that are actually founded in common sense.
But will prosecutors, especially in Chittenden County, play ball?