|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
By Guy Page
The downstream effect of Gov. Phil Scott’s visit to Boston this morning has delayed the Vermont Legislature’s consideration of today’s main agenda item: an up-or-down vote on H.454, transformation of the state’s education funding system.
A House-Senate conference committee approved a compromise deal on H.454 Friday afternoon. But with Phil Scott in Boston until mid-afternoon today, Lt. Gov. John Rodgers is acting governor. That leaves Senate Pro Tem Phil Baruth presiding over the Senate, and “that will put me in the podium unable to vote,” he told senators at about 10:40 PM.
Deliberation and action on this session’s most significant legislation will wait until Rodgers can pick up the gavel upon Scott’s return – perhaps around 2 PM.
Meanwhile, the Senate planned this morning to meet as a non-voting ‘caucus of the whole’ to learn details about the conference committee agreement. But that, too, was delayed until at least after 11 AM, due to delays in copying and distributing the conference committee’s report and analysis. NBC5 reporter Steve Biddix estimates the State House print shop would need 4,560 pieces of paper to print 30 copies of the 159-page agreement.
That doesn’t count another expected document – an analysis of the agreement’s impact on school district boundaries, class sizes, and per-pupil costs, and projected property taxes. As published in VDC Friday, here’s an overview of the conference committee agreement:
New, larger school district boundaries will be set July 1, 2026, take effect July 1 2028. Transition details include:
- A School District Redistricting Task Force is established to propose up to three options for these new boundaries by December 1, 2025. These proposed districts are expected to have an average daily membership of approximately 4,000 to 8,000 preK-12 students.
- A School District Voting Ward Working Group will create voting wards within the new school districts to ensure substantially equal weighting of votes for school board members.
- The first school board member elections within these newly created districts are scheduled for a special election in November 2027. The General Assembly intends for the new, larger school districts to assume responsibility for the education of all resident students on July 1, 2028.
Independent schools will be eligible for public school tuition, subject to a lengthy list of eligibility guidelines.
New average class size minimums will be 10 students for first grade, 12 for grades 2-5, 15 for grades 6-8 in required content areas, and 18 for grades 9-12 in required content areas.
Education spending: the “base amount” for the per-pupil foundation formula is set at $15,033, to be adjusted for inflation annually. That figure matches the higher House proposal over lower figures proposed by the Senate and Gov. Scott. It is not clear whether the new proposed per-pupil spending will keep property taxes flat, or even at a reduced rate, when it takes effect.
Senate bill says campaign contributors of $500 or more must register as ‘committees’ – Postponing the H.454 action, the Senate took up and passed H.474, miscellaneous changes to election law – including requiring every individual contributing $500 or more to register as a political action committee.
Senate progressives successfully argued for this provision during committee discussion. During a Government Operations Committee meeting last week, Sen. Becca White (D-Windsor) said it is intended to reduce undue electoral influence of the ‘super-rich.’
Gov Ops chair Brian Collamore said the bill is a first step to providing transparency about donations from out-of-state contributors “with pocketbooks larger than mine.”
The bill passed on a voice-vote with one or two senators voting negative. The Senate then waived procedures and passed H.474 on third and final reading, and sent it to the House for their consideration.
Synthetic media disclosure required in elections – Over in the House, representatives adjourned after passing a Senate bill, S.23, restricting use of synthetic media in elections.
The bill requires disclosure of what it calls ‘synthetic media’ 90 days before an election. It will now go to Gov. Scott for his review. A veto is not considered likely.
The seven sponsors of S.23 include Republicans, Democrats, and Progressives, and four of the five members of Senate Gov Ops. The seven sponsors are: Sen. Ruth Hardy, Sen. Alison Clarkson, Sen. Brian Collamore, Sen. Robert Norris, Sen. Tanya Vyhovsky, Sen. Anne Watson and Sen. Rebecca White.
“Deceptive and fraudulent synthetic media” means synthetic media that creates a representation of an individual or individuals with the intent to injure the reputation of a candidate, to influence the outcome of an election….” including “an image, an audio recording, or a video recording of an individual’s appearance, speech, conduct, or environment that has been created or intentionally manipulated with the use of digital technology, including artificial intelligence, in a manner that creates a realistic but false representation of the candidate,” the bill states.
Homeless bill veto likely to stand in House – No vote has been taken, yet, on a scheduled override vote of Gov. Scott’s veto of H.91. Extremely unlikely House Speaker Jill Krowinski can muster 100 votes to override.
House to reconvene at 2 PM to consider H.454.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: State House Spotlight










Excellent coverage on this enormous and complex Ed Bill. Shame on the passing of H474 $500 PAC requirement. Several individuals who contributed more than $500 to my campaign are not going to form PACs. Every republican should be voting NO on this!
Will you just look at that education bill! Doesn’t it make you wonder why we ever got ourselves involved in running a schooling business? Couldn’t this be left to the citizens? We have a public interest in having an educated populace, true. But, couldn’t this be accomplished by distributing the collected moneys to families (or not collecting those monies in the first place?) Families could contract for whatever teaching services and curriculum they want dealing directly with teachers. Isn’t the intent of our constitution to protect citizens from intrusive government? …don’t interfere with our God given liberty? Does running this expensive feather bedded business fit that intent?
Mass.gov June 16, 2025: “Today, northeastern U.S. Governors and Canadian Premiers gathered at the Massachusetts State House to discuss their commitment to strengthening trade and economic relations. Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey hosted the Strong Partnerships, Shared Future Convening in response to tariffs on Canadian imports and exports…..A recording of the discussion between Governors and Premiers moderated by former Vice Chair of Bank of America (BofA) and former Chair of BofA Europe Anne Finucane…”
While the Vermont Legislature continues building their paper tiger tower of Babel, a meeting between banksters, Premiers of Kanadastan and Northeastern Governors takes place at the same time G7 leaders meet in Alberta, Kanadastan. Appears the powers are hammering out the fine details of the NWO digital technocracy – depopulation, wealth transfer, reset. All these meetings, all these gatherings of billionaires, tech “giants”, heads of State and principalities are all at the same time riots, marches, protests, bombs bursting in mid-air, death and destruction. Smell the sulfur in the air yet?
Re: “Education spending: the “base amount” for the per-pupil foundation formula is set at $15,033, to be adjusted for inflation annually. That figure matches the higher House proposal over lower figures proposed by the Senate and Gov. Scott. It is not clear whether the new proposed per-pupil spending will keep property taxes flat, or even at a reduced rate, when it takes effect.”
“…not clear whether the new proposed per-pupil spending will keep property taxes flat…”
Not clear???
Article 9: Vermont Constitution:
“…nor are the people bound by any law but such as they have in like manner assented to, for their common good: and previous to any law being made to raise a tax, the purpose for which it is to be raised ought to appear evident to the Legislature to be of more service to community than the money would be if not collected.”
Please note, too, that the definition of ‘per-pupil’ is absent in this report. Keep in mind that this aspect of school spending is, and likely will continue to be, manipulated behind closed doors.
Never mind ‘inflation’. What constitutes a ‘pupil’? Is it one person, one body, one beating heart, one brain? Or is it an ‘equalized student’? Or is it a student with a behavioral problem, or a so-called ELL (English language learner), or a student from a low-income household, or a special needs student, counted as being more than one student because someone arbitrarily assumes it costs more to educate them than it does a ‘normal’ or ‘average’ student?
The fox is not only guarding the chicken coop, it’s collecting the eggs, culling the flock, and redistributing the resources to suit its needs, not the need of the taxpayers or the parents. The hubris in the exercise cannot be exaggerated. How dare anyone who is likely to be as delusional as anyone else, not only assume they know what’s best for we chickens but force us to adhere to their whimsical and dangerous nonsense.
If you aren’t sure this is the case, consider our current dystopian state of affairs. These same people have been managing you for decades. And given their performance to date (highest education costs in the world and dysfunctional student outcomes), why do you continue to empower them? Are you delusional too?
Make no mistake. Neither the Governor nor the Legislature, nor the special interest groups enabling them, have any better idea what is best for you or your children. All they really have is the ability to steal your property in order to sustain their charade.
At least they have that ability until average voters – you, your neighbors, and your associates, figure out that you’re being ripped off, and elect people who actually represent your interests, not their own.