Or was the PCB scare just a scam that got out of control?

by Rob Roper

It was only a few years ago that Vermont lawmakers were bragging that thanks to them Vermont had adopted the lowest acceptable threshold for PCB’s (a potential carcinogen found in certain pre-1980’s building materials) in schools – a level significantly lower than what the federal EPA deems safe (4000% lower!). Levels significantly lower than what European governments deem to be safe. Some critics worried it was an impossible standard, but Vermont being Vermont, we had to be the lowest.

In 2021, Vermont lawmakers took things a step further by slipping language into that year’s budget bill mandating that every school in our state built before 1980 be tested for PCBs along Vermont’s new regulatory guidelines. We were the first state in the nation to demand such a program. Vermont being Vermont we also had to be first!

Heady stuff, saving the children and all. Makes for wonderful press conferences and a bullet point for your next round of campaign materials.

VPIRG boasted in its 2021 legislative wrap up at the close of session, “This year, we supported further protections for Vermont’s children by backing new requirements in H.426 requiring schools to be tested for radon and PCBs. This will help to identify toxic threats and keep children safe.” Great!

According to the state website on toxic substances,

PCBs can cause serious health effects. The potential for health effects from PCBs, as with other chemicals, depends on how much, how often, and how long someone is exposed to them.

Numerous studies in both humans and animals have shown that exposure to PCBs can affect the nervous, immune, reproductive and endocrine systems. PCBs are also classified as human carcinogens. This means that exposure to PCBs can cause cancer in humans.

Additionally, the different health effects of PCBs may be interconnected. This means that if one system of the body is affected by PCBs, it may have significant effects on the other systems of the body, which can lead to many serious health problems.

But now, in the midst of a devastating property tax crisis brought about by a combination of a tax-and-spend-like-drunken-sailors ideology wrapped in general legislative incompetence, it looks like that mandatory PCB testing program is going to be put on hold. Not because the tests aren’t turning up PCBs, but because they are. And fixing said problem is expensive. And potentially expensive on the property tax.

It’s one thing to stand on a soap box and proclaim your love for the children. It’s another to actually pay a price – political and financial — for doing it. So, faced with the prospect of the latter, our courageous legislators, say never mind. What’s a few carcinogens here and there? Kids are tough!

The ostensible logic behind a testing pause put forward by Peter Conlon (D-Cornwall), chair of the House Education Committee, is that because the state doesn’t have the money to fix the problems if found, there’s no point in looking for problems in the first place. Like with that Spinal Tap drummer who died in a bizarre gardening accident, the authorities in Montpelier have decided PCBs in our schools are crimes “best left unsolved.”  

Thankfully my own kids have aged out of the hot mess Vermont government run public education in all of its aspects has devolved into, but if I were still a parent of school aged children and there was a possibility of a poisonous substance lingering throughout the building I’m forced by law to send my little tykes to 180 days a year, I’D WANT TO KNOW!

In a recent interview with VT Digger, Agency of Natural Resources Secretary Julie Moore estimated the cost of finishing the testing program would is between $30 million and $70 million over the next two years. That’s a lot of money, for sure. But it’s about the same amount allocated for the newly passed universal free meals program. It’s far less than the amount newly allocated to expand government-run pre-k. If PCB’s are really the dire problem we were led to believe, wouldn’t it make more sense to prioritize ensuring classrooms are not a health hazard before shoveling more, younger children into them? I guess not!

And if the resources aren’t available to fix the problem once detected – a legitimate reality – no parent should be forced to send their kid into that space. Ever. Other options should be made available. Immediately.

And this, I suspect, is why the Democrats in the legislature are now so hell bent on a testing pause (they tried last year as well with H.486): The VTNEA does not want parents in a legal/moral position to demand other educational options.

If a school has to close because it’s unsafe (or for any other reason) and there are no other public options within the district, the families in that district get school choice. Not every community has an abandoned mall they can convert into a school as Burlington did when PCB’s led to the demolition of their high school, or the nearly quarter of a billion dollars to build a new one.  The teachers’ union, public school special interests, and their political bedfellows would, it appears, much rather see kids get cancer than allow an opening for expanded school choice to emerge.

Either that, or the PCB issue was always just a phony baloney scare tactic used by politicians to virtue signal their “anything for the children” personae and to give their activist allies like VPIRG a lucrative opportunity to fundraise for a cause by spreading unnecessary panic. But, as with the Act 127 ‘equity’ pupil weighting debacle, it’s blown up in their faces.

Rob Roper is a freelance writer who has been involved with Vermont politics and policy for over 20 years. This article reprinted with permission from Behind the Lines: Rob Roper on Vermont Politics, robertroper.substack.com