|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
By Rob Roper
The Vermont House just passed H.938 – An act relating to establishing the Vermont Homelessness Response Continuum, which appropriates just shy of $83,000,000 to deal with the problem. But here’s the problem….
In the years leading up to 2020, Vermont spent about $35 million a year on programs designed to help the homeless out of their unfortunate situations, and there were about 1100 people throughout the state who were considered homeless. Then came the avalanche of COVID cash from the federal government and the amount our esteemed legislators had on hand to solve the homelessness problem ballooned to around $150 million per year – over a 400 percent increase in spending. That’s $136,000 per homeless person.
One would think that with those levels of resources the geniuses in Montpelier – with a majority in charge that claims to care so much — couldn’t fail to fix the issue or at least make significant progress in getting people off the streets and back on track to secure, productive lives. But, no, that is not what happened.
Given this windfall mountain of taxpayer largess earmarked to lower the homeless population our intrepid lawmakers got to work and managed to quadruple it. Yup. According to the findings in H.938, as of December 2025 “…there were 4,022 individuals who were homeless in the State….” Other estimates put the number even higher at over 4500.

Source: Auditor’s Report, Vermont’s Commitment to Ending Homelessness

Source: Vermont Public
Over this time period, with the supermajority of Democrats overriding veto after veto from Governor Scott, Vermont rose to having the fourth highest per capita homeless population in the nation, with the fastest rising homeless population anywhere. That level of incompetence (or corruption) boggles the mind.
There are a couple of possible conclusions we can make here that are debatable. One, that Vermont’s overly generous programs, especially handing out motel vouchers, were attracting hordes of people from other states eager to take advantage of the taxpayers’ compassion. Advocates insist most adamantly that this is not happening. Examples are purely anecdotal, curmudgeons in every state say the same thing, yada yada yada. (They also have no interest in tracking where new applicants are coming from, and you can read into that what you will.)
But, granting the advocates their position on this point, that leaves us with scenario number two: they spent a half a billion dollars or more over a five-year period to drive three thousand or so fellow Vermonters out of their homes and onto the streets. Long, slow clap for that!
It’s a plausible conclusion given all the other policies the majority has forced down our throats over the same half decade. Exploding property taxes certainly comes to mind as a reason why people can’t afford to remain in a home. “Green” building codes and zoning laws that limit and drive up the cost of constructing new, affordable homes for people to move into certainly doesn’t help. A high tax and onerous regulatory environment that has led to Vermont having one of — if not the — lowest rate of economic growth of any state in the Union (0.16 percent) cripples people’s ability to find good paying job opportunities that might allow them to afford housing…. So, yeah, I can buy scenario two.
Will another $83 million turn things around? Will this clean up the massive mess created by colossally mis-spending all that money? Place your bets! (That’s if you have any money left after paying all the taxes necessary to cover Vermont’s $9.33 billion budget.)
On the bright side, $83 million is less than $150 million and there seems to be at least some recognition that the glory days of spraying cash through a firehose at every issue can’t continue. But the real lesson that needs to be learned is that the policy approach we have been taking both directly and indirectly regarding homelessness is making the situation worse, not better. Time for new thinking — and maybe some new lawmakers — not just new money.
Rob Roper is a freelance writer with 25 years of experience in Vermont politics including three years service as chair of the Vermont Republican Party and nine years as President of the Ethan Allen Institute, Vermont’s free market think tank.
EVENT RECAP: If you missed the Election Integrity Panel discussion with Secretary of State, Sara Copeland-Hanzas, Montpelier City Clerk John Odum, GOP Chittenden County Vice Chair Ron Lawrence and myself, here the link to VIDEO.
TUNE IN EVERY TUESDAY 9-11 AM to hear me host Vermont Viewpoint on WDEV. AM 550, FM 96.1, or to live stream CLICK HERE.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Commentary









Build it and they will come.
Hopefully Scott Vetos this one and it sticks. Just imagine if private companies spent that much without results. 😳
BINGO! Stop this stuff!
Where is that $83,000,000 coming from ❓ How about forcing the homeless to work (if they are able) instead of freebies year after year, at tax payers expense.
The old Proverb “Give a man a fish, and he will eat for a day; teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime”, has never been truer. How about spending money (if we must) to teach the homeless a way of making a living. That seems to logically be a better way to spend money on the homeless.
The answer from under the golden dome always seems to be “Just throw more money at it”. If they would only look around, they would know this simply does not work to actually fix a problem or improve peoples lives.
Case in point Seattle Washington; the overall scale of the homelessness crisis has not improved; it has significantly worsened according to official metrics. While BILLIONS have been invested over the last decade, the number of people experiencing homelessness in the Seattle/King County region has reached record highs as of 2024–2025. ( have to question their use of the word “invested”) There was a 117% increase in chronic homelessness between 2022 and 2024.
I could go on, but you get the drift….. And once again, those under the golden dome are NOT doing what is best for Vermont OR Vermonters.
But they are doing what’s best for themselves! They seek to BE served and not TO serve. Every one of the final recipients is more and more dependent on the government. To government officials and NGO’s, whether or not they want to admit it, that’s a win!
If all else fails Rep. Jubilee McGill and others sponsored H.885, a bill that restricts towns from prohibiting homeless encampments on town greens or other town property, unless the town provides suitable accommodations at its own expense.
I’ve got an idea. How about if Rep. Jubilee McGill, and any of the other brain trust fund babies set up tent cities on their lawns !
Apparently, Jubilee might not be aware of what happened to the University of Vermont’s ‘shanty town’ on the green in the 80’s. She may want to investigate that bit of history, or it may repeat itself.
Maybe the state could start a Go Fund Me for the homeless. I’m sure there are some Columbia, Harvard and Yale graduates that would gladly give.
Funny the more they spend, the worse the problem gets. Do you think they really want to help the people or do they want to enhance their power and influence and that of the NGO’s that distribute the cash?
You hit that nail right on the head Rob ! New Law makers ! There are sooo many problems that could be solved with that answer ! The biggest problem with that though, is that most people think that the problem is someone else’s law makers ! NOT !
I’d be willing to bet that now that this money might be out there, these homeless will now have families willing to take them in, for a price.
Vermont stands among the noteworthy benefactor jurisdictions like San Francisco, LA, Boston, Seattle and NYC where the more they spend on homeless services, for some reason the number of homeless (or people CLAIMING to be homeless) just keeps rising.
Many are left radicals who come to Vermont by invitation. Many aren’t even actually homeless.
I think that everyone who supports this needs should be REQUIRED to take in at least one homeless person and their addictions.
If they have a big yard, welcome a homeless camp on THEIR expense.
Maybe Vermont needs to follow Georgia’s lead. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/georgia-lawmakers-pass-bill-that-lets-property-owners-sue-over-homeless-encampments