|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Desperate calls for Scott to delay unrealistic, logistically impossible GWSA requirements with Executive Order.
by Rob Roper
The latest clash between climate ideology and reality – the requirement in the Global Warming Solutions Act (2020) that Vermont adopt California’s Clean Cars and Clean Trucks standards – is coming to a head. So far reality has been racking up the victories with the Clean Heat Standard for home heating now lying “dormant” as too expensive, too complicated, too regressive and ripe for fraud, and its equally expensive and regressive alternative, a Cap & Invest carbon tax on heating and transportation fuels, too politically toxic for meaningful discussion. That leaves the only policy in place for either of the two significant GHG emitting sectors, thermal and transportation, as the Clean Cars & Trucks rule — the wheels are coming off fast.
Vermont was not alone in signing onto the California standards. Eleven other states initially jumped on this electrically powered bandwagon. But we are now one of a shrinking number sticking with the policy, or at least its current timeline, despite a growing list of niggling details dogging its implementation – like requiring dealers to sell vehicles that don’t exist, consumers don’t want and can’t afford, and the infrastructure to operate them isn’t in place.
Legislators in Montpelier have heard volumes of testimony from vehicle dealers who cite lack of sufficient customer demand. The GWSA mandate insists that in 2026 the percentage of EVs sold in Vermont triple from 12 percent to 35 percent. (How? I don’t know. Magic?) While demand for EVs in Vermont has been increasing, it’s not increasing nearly that fast, and with likely cuts to government subsidies for EV purchases, that demand growth is not likely to persist. According to the Wall Street Journal, “Sales of EVs in the U.S. fell by around 5% during the month [of April], according to estimates from the research firm Motor Intelligence, while the broader car market grew by 10%. Monthly EV sales in the U.S. have only declined three times since 2021.”
As for trucks, the mandates are even more fantastical and damaging. An Oregon legislator, Rep. Shelly Boshart Davis (R-Albany), calling for her state’s withdrawal from the compact summed things up neatly:
“Even if the state would be willing to spend the money needed to install chargers throughout the state, and somehow changed land use laws to park all these trucks somewhere to charge, and changed the federal hours-of-service laws to allow these truck drivers to be able to rest while charging and still complete their normal haul, and had the money to invest in companies upgrading their fleets to EVs that cost twice as much, and started that all today, it would be years before this would happen. And yet the rules are already implemented.”
While these types of arguments are being heard and acted upon in some states (Delaware, Maryland and Massachusetts have already hit the pause button, and Oregon, Washington, New York and New Jersey are seriously considering joining them), Vermont’s majority party (that would be the Democrats) are sticking their fingers in their ears and chanting “lalalalalalalalalala”all the day long. The minority Republicans, on the other hand, have put forward bills that would remove Vermont from the California standards, but unfortunately don’t have the numbers to move the bills.

A legislative solution would certainly be the cleanest option for averting this obvious pending disaster. However, with the Democrats unwilling to let the necessary bills move forward and the mandates set to kick in in less than 90 days, desperate calls are asking Governor Scott to get us out of this mess with an executive order – which he can do to at least some degree. For example, last month, Maryland Governor Wes Moore (D-MD) caved to reality and issued an executive order that did not completely halt enforcement of Advanced Clean Trucks, but gave his state Department of Environment “enforcement discretion” to not enforce the mandates for the model years through 2028.
Vermont’s Advanced Clean Cars II and Advanced Clean Trucks Rules were adopted by the Agency of Natural Resources in 2022 in response to the 2021 Vermont Climate Action Plan created under the Global Warming Solutions Act. Ergo, ANR is free to pull back its rule on its own authority, or by executive order. And this is what some are pressing the governor to do. If you agree, consider the following call to action:
In Vermont, Governor Scott also has the power to delay or repeal these regulations. Delaware’s governor announced that the state would drop its adoption of California’s EV rules, joining Maryland and Massachusetts in hitting the pause button on some or all of the mandates.
Click on the link below, enter your information, and send a polite and straightforward message to the Governor asking him to do the same.
https://vermontce.my.vermont.gov/s/governor-office-ce
Now this could open up Vermont to lawsuit under the GWSA’s idiotic, moronic “right of action” clause for not following the Climate Action Plan. The common sense solution to that problem is, of course, to repeal right of action clause, which Republicans and the Governor have tried to do this session, but again, the majority has placed fingers firmly in their ears and “lalalalalalala!”
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Commentary, Environment, Legislation, State Government









Will this insanity ever stop? California standards in Vermont; population 39.5 Million vs 650,000. Los Angeles with the worst air pollution in the US! If you love California so much and their never ending unrealistic BS, why don’t you move there, take your egotistical arrogance with you and stop trying to force your self serving agendas on us!
How many trips have you taken in one of those electric flying airplanes?????
Start planning some way to forbid the 15 million tourists from entering Vermont with those damned gasoline cars. Then let’s go with electric snow machines and electric 4- wheelers. But, of course, the Gov. could end this madness.
Veto! veto! veto! veto!, veto, veto! veto! veto! veto!
My electricity provider is GMP. If you go to their website and click on “Who we are” you will read: “We serve more than 275,000 residential and business customers in Vermont with electricity that’s 100% carbon free and 82% renewable on an annual basis.
What most people do not understand OR choose to ignore (especially those who advocate for an all electric Vermont) is the fact the GMP statement as written is false…at least based my understanding of electric grids such as the one Vermont is umbilically linked to which is iso New England (iso-NE)
GMP may very well buy electricity contracts that involve the purchase of electrons made from non-fossil fuel producing systems, BUT when I turn on a light in my house the electrons that energize the bulb in my light reflect the composition of electrons in the iso-NE grid at that moment.
As I write this comment on my computer that is powered by electrons in the iso-NE grid, 56% of the electrons derive from natural gas fossil-fired generating entities, 19% from nuclear reactors, 11% Hydro, 9% renewables, and the last 5% vary from day-to-day.
So although I pay GMP a monthly fee for the company to provide me with electricity, and although GMP buys electricity from sources that are 100% carbon free, the electrons that energize electric consuming appliances in MY house are primarily from natural gas and nuclear generating sources.
Now many in Vermont consider nuclear to be the devil and that perspective, in part, is why Vermont Yankee was run out-of-town so to speak.
What members of the Legislature who favor going all in on electric vehicles choose to ignore is: (1) unless someone is living off the grid or has solar panels and fills their entire garage with enough storage batteries to charge the batteries in their electric vehicle, when they charge their electric car batteries it will primarily be with electrons generating by burning fossil fuels, and (2) most electric car batteries are made in China and 60% of all manufacturing in China is powered by electrons from coal-fired power plants. Add to the latter the energy needed to extract all the minerals to make those batteries and you realize that electric vehicles are not the global warming saviors that many people make them out to be.
iso-NE’s primary responsibility is to ensure the integrity and stability of the grid…and the grid must always be 100% full of electrons. To meet that obligation iso-NE like most RTOs (Regional Transmission Organizations) require base-load electricity sources that operate 24/7 under all conditions (solar and wind canNOT meet that requirement) and dispatchable sources (can rapidly increase output when demand rapidly increases) which are primarily fossil fuel generating entities. Solar and wind are NOT dispatchable sources.
So all-in-all the fact that “the requirement in the Global Warming Solutions Act (2020) that Vermont adopt California’s Clean Cars and Clean Trucks standards” is not only objectively unattainable considering current costs of EVs, but when all relevant information is considered, EV mandates will NOT achieve the reduction in greenhouse gas production that so many in this state declare that they will.
Yes, Yes, Yes! Finally a common sense explanation that maybe Montpelier can comprehend!
God help us!
Will Phil change course? I’ll believe when I see it. For the time being – Vermont is still East California to me. The green energy state of confusion.
What we need is the Governor publicly calling for the repeal of the GWSA so a new administration could not start this foolishness again without new legislation.
What is happening with the Federal lawsuit against Vermont? Could that settlement solve our whole problem?