Roll Call!

Roll Call #2: Billion-dollar housing bill raises high-end income, property transfer taxes

by Guy Page

The House on Tuesday, April 2 approved H.829, allocating $100 million/year for 10 years to improve housing. The revenue comes from higher income taxes for the wealthy and an increase in the property transfer tax for properties of $750K or more.

The bill pays for selected housing improvements by raising the income tax 34% for incomes $500K or more – from the current 8.75% to 11.75%. It’s expected to raise about $74 million/year.

Also, a 3.65% added transfer tax on properties worth $750K will raise $21 million. An PPT reduction on some lower-end properties will cost the state $3.65 million in revenue, resulting in a combined $17 million in new revenue from all PPT changes in the bill.

Key provisions of the bill include retaining and enhancing programs such as the Vermont Housing Improvement Program (VHIP), which has already rehabilitated over 500 units, and increasing investments in mobile and manufactured home parks.

A Progressive caucus amendment to require ‘just cause’ eviction was rejected 13-119.

“When you are in crisis you need to act. This bill is action to move us out of crisis,” Rep. Robin Chesnut-Tangerman (D/P Middletown Springs) said. “Voting no is not a solution.”

Minority Leader Rep. Patti McCoy (R-Poultney) disagreed and explained why:

“Raising taxes and fees, instead of funding these programs through our budget, is something I cannot support. Increasing the property transfer tax as well as the personal income tax to support these programs is something that I cannot support. My vote is no.”

Chesnut-Tangerman of Middletown SpringsYea*
Dolan of WaitsfieldYea*
Lalley of ShelburneYea*
LaMont of MorristownYea*
Long of NewfaneYea*
McGill of BridportYea*
Stone of BurlingtonYea*
Wood of WaterburyYea*
Andrews of WestfordYea
Arsenault of WillistonYea
Austin of ColchesterYea
Bartholomew of HartlandYea
Berbeco of WinooskiYea
Black of EssexYea
Bluemle of BurlingtonYea
Bongartz of ManchesterYea
Bos-Lun of WestminsterYea
Brady of WillistonYea
Brown of RichmondYea
Brownell of PownalYea
Brumsted of ShelburneYea
Burke of BrattleboroYea
Burrows of West WindsorYea
Buss of WoodstockYea
Campbell of St. JohnsburyYea
Carpenter of Hyde ParkYea
Carroll of BenningtonYea
Casey of MontpelierYea
Chapin of East MontpelierYea
Chase of ChesterYea
Chase of ColchesterYea
Christie of HartfordYea
Cina of BurlingtonYea
Coffey of GuilfordYea
Cole of HartfordYea
Conlon of CornwallYea
Cordes of LincolnYea
Demrow of CorinthYea
Dodge of EssexYea
Dolan of Essex JunctionYea
Durfee of ShaftsburyYea
Emmons of SpringfieldYea
Farlice-Rubio of BarnetYea
Garofano of EssexYea
Goldman of RockinghamYea
Graning of JerichoYea
Headrick of BurlingtonYea
Holcombe of NorwichYea
Hooper of BurlingtonYea
Houghton of Essex JunctionYea
Howard of Rutland CityYea
Hyman of South BurlingtonYea
James of ManchesterYea
Jerome of BrandonYea
Kornheiser of BrattleboroYea
Krasnow of South BurlingtonYea
LaBounty of LyndonYea
LaLonde of South BurlingtonYea
Lanpher of VergennesYea
Leavitt of Grand IsleYea
Logan of BurlingtonYea
Masland of ThetfordYea
McCarthy of St. Albans CityYea
McFaun of Barre TownYea
Mihaly of CalaisYea
Minier of South BurlingtonYea
Morris of SpringfieldYea
Mrowicki of PutneyYea
Nicoll of LudlowYea
Notte of Rutland CityYea
Noyes of WolcottYea
Nugent of South BurlingtonYea
O’Brien of TunbridgeYea
Ode of BurlingtonYea
Pajala of LondonderryYea
Patt of WorcesterYea
Pouech of HinesburgYea
Priestley of BradfordYea
Rachelson of BurlingtonYea
Rice of DorsetYea
Roberts of HalifaxYea
Scheu of MiddleburyYea
Sheldon of MiddleburyYea
Sims of CraftsburyYea
Small of WinooskiYea
Squirrell of UnderhillYea
Stebbins of BurlingtonYea
Stevens of WaterburyYea
Surprenant of BarnardYea
Taylor of ColchesterYea
Templeman of BrowningtonYea
Toleno of BrattleboroYea
Torre of MoretownYea
Waters Evans of CharlotteYea
White of BethelYea
Whitman of BenningtonYea
Williams of Barre CityYea
Krowinski of BurlingtonNot Voting
McCoy of PoultneyNay*
Arrison of WeathersfieldNay
Bartley of FairfaxNay
Beck of St. JohnsburyNay
Birong of VergennesNay
Boyden of CambridgeNay
Branagan of GeorgiaNay
Brennan of ColchesterNay
Burditt of West RutlandNay
Canfield of Fair HavenNay
Clifford of Rutland CityNay
Corcoran of BenningtonNay
Demar of EnosburghNay
Dickinson of St. Albans TownNay
Donahue of NorthfieldNay
Elder of StarksboroNay
Galfetti of Barre TownNay
Goslant of NorthfieldNay
Graham of WilliamstownNay
Gregoire of FairfieldNay
Hango of BerkshireNay
Harrison of ChittendenNay
Higley of LowellNay
Labor of MorganNay
Laroche of FranklinNay
Lipsky of StoweNay
Maguire of Rutland CityNay
Marcotte of CoventryNay
Mattos of MiltonNay
Morrissey of BenningtonNay
Page of Newport CityNay
Parsons of NewburyNay
Peterson of ClarendonNay
Quimby of LyndonNay
Sammis of CastletonNay
Shaw of PittsfordNay
Sibilia of DoverNay
Smith of DerbyNay
Taylor of MiltonNay
Toof of St. Albans TownNay
Walker of SwantonNay
Williams of GranbyNay
Andriano of OrwellAbsent
Anthony of Barre CityAbsent
Hooper of RandolphAbsent
McCann of MontpelierAbsent
Morgan of MiltonAbsent
Oliver of SheldonAbsent
Pearl of DanvilleAbsent
Satcowitz of RandolphAbsent
Troiano of StannardAbsent

Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Roll Call!

5 replies »

  1. the vermont pork masters have been exposed//// i hope they enjoy their 20 percent increase in their property taxes for the next ten years/// i will still be here when they are long gone//////////////

  2. wake up key board thumpers/// a few more years of the pork masters and you will be living in a tent///

  3. the ten year program is the police contract with the city and st. albans town/// town was given sewer allocation in this deal between town and city managers/// it was the deal of the century/// the town manager has retired and the town tax payers are left to pay the bill/// the select board voted for this////

  4. Re: “…selected housing improvements”. I’ll say.

    “Housing Improvement Program (VHIP), which has already rehabilitated over 500 units”, operates through five local Homeownership Centers in Vermont.

    One of these centers, RuralEdge. serves Caldonia, Essex, and Orleans counties. This RuralEdge center has more than 60 employees with $8.4 Million in annual revenue. Its key employees earn six-figure salaries. It lists over $2.9 Million in other annual wages and benefits, which is 36% of its annual revenue.

    The Champlain Housing Trust, serving Chittenden, Franklin, and Grand Isle counties, another Homeownership Center, declares more than $41 million in annual revenue. Its key employees earn six-figure salaries, plus benefits and a total of $7.3 Million in other annual wages and benefits, or 35% of its annual revenue.

    NeighborWorks of Western Vermont, another center, received $2.9 Million in annual revenue. Its executive director receives more than $138,000 in salary. And the center pays out $1.19 Million in other salaries and benefits. That’s 45% of its total revenue.

    Downstreet Housing & Community Development, serving Lamoille, Orange, and Washington counties, has over $6 Million in annual revenue. Its executive receives a six-figure salary. And it has $1.647 Million in other wages and salaries, or 39% of its revenues.

    Windham & Windsor Housing Trust, serving Windham, and Windsor counties, has $5 Million in annual revenue. Its executive receives a six-figure salary. Other salaries and wages equal $1.6 Million annually, or 44% of annual revenue.

    Okay. So, more than $23 Million goes to the salaries and benefits of people working in these five non-profit NGOs every year. The legislature wants to increase taxes and fees to fund the VHIP even more. And these legislators are bragging that they have already rehabilitated 500 units. Already? Go figure.

    • In the bizarre logic of our legislature we can have an $8.8 billion (plus) l budget paid for by a confiscatory income tax on earners. Of course, so many of those high income earners would be resourceful enough to move across the river to New Hampshire with a far more favorable taxation system. And in case these high income earners, didn’t understand they would also be assessed a confiscatory tax on real estate transactions on higher priced properties. The net result would be outward migration of an important economic resource.

      Will they ever learn?