Burlington

Update: Pro-ICE rally delayed to ensure police presence

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Guy Page

Updated from earlier post

The chair of the Burlington Republican Committee is promoting a Pro-ICE agent rally in Burlington. 

The event originally scheduled for Saturday, January 24 had been postponed due to predicted extreme cold and pending the securing of a demonstration permit, Bill Oetjen, chair of the Burlington GOP committee told VDC.  

The post reads: “Bill Oetjen, Burlington’s GOP chair, is hosting a pro-ICE demonstration supporting ICE agents in Burlington.”

Original post

While anti-ICE demonstrations by No Kings, Indivisible, and PSL are plentiful in Vermont, few if any demonstrations have been called on behalf of Immigration & Customs Enforcement. 

“After further reflection and some feedback I’d received, it occurred to me that some groundwork would be in order,” Oetjen said. He cited extremely cold temperatures forecast for Saturday and advice from a MAGA VT group member who recommended pushing the date back.

Oetjen said the delay will allow organizers to coordinate with the Burlington Police Department to ensure a uniformed police presence and to apply for a demonstration permit. “No permit is legally necessary, but it lends the event more legitimacy,” he said.

Responding to questions about the purpose of the demonstration, Oetjen said support for ICE is broader than often portrayed.

“Many Vermonters do support ICE. Those are the voices that have been routinely dismissed almost everywhere in the media,” he said. “Our visibility can help counter the predominant narrative.”
Oetjen also said organizers are mindful of potential attempts to provoke conflict. “I used to be on the hard Left, and I know their tactics,” he said. “Buying time allows us to set strict guidelines for us to maintain discipline.”

He added that negative media coverage is likely regardless. “What does it matter? They do it all the time whether we peacefully stand and wave flags, or hide in our homes.”

Oetjen said he has contacted Burlington Police Chief Shawn Burke and plans to follow up. “I will continue the conversation and take his recommendations under consideration,” he said.


“My motto as current chairman of the BTVGOP is that we must be vocal and visible to be viable,” Oetjen said, arguing that Burlington needs Republican representation on the City Council and its boards and commissions.

The announcement was seen today (January 19) by VDC on reddit, a generally-Progressive social media site where comments ranged from ‘ignore them’ to suggesting throwing water balloons and ice at protesters. Anti-ICE protesters in recent months have scrawled graffiti on the Williston ICE office, and have demonstrated in solidarity with illegal immigrants being detained by ICE. 

Oetjen’s planned demonstration in support of ICE comes following weeks of aggressive socialist protests against ICE detainment actions in Minneapolis and a day after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on CBS’s Face The Nation Sunday that 70% of ICE detainees have criminal records, including violent crime, in addition to the crime of entering the United States illegally: “Every single individual has committed a crime, but 70% of them have committed or have charges against them on violent crimes, and crimes that they are charged with or have been convicted of, that have come from other countries.”

Face The Nation host Margaret Brennan disputed the claim but did not provide details. 


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Burlington

4 replies »

  1. We can’t go but are with you in spirit! We love and appreciate ICE and Border Patrol. Protect our sovereignity!

  2. And now it appears we will need to provide security for all church services in the State as well. Just like a child who keeps misbehaving, you finally have to be the adult in the room and say, “that’s enough”.

  3. Bill and Burlington law enforcement, please comment on what security measures you have lined up for those who gather. I appreciate your willingness to take a stand; safety is a concern. The Burlington area is rife with those who might easily take offense and are known to disrupt good intentions to back law enforcement – like Fund the Police. I hope you and law enforcement of the area might weigh in on this so this can be a safe gathering to support the muscle of the law. No matter how many laws are on the books and the legislators heap on the pile, they are meaningless if law enforcement can’t protect – We the People.

  4. I have long been critical of the way our immigration policy has been ignored in Vermont on farms, construction sites, etc. and pushed for practical changes that would align with existing policies for what already has long been in place for guest workers in some of our agricultural sectorsl like vegetable and fruit farms, and in hospitality sectors when local workers are unable to fill positions.

    I have also been supportive of President Trump’s stated policy goal of focusing immigration enforcement on the “worst of the worst”. Unfortunately this has not been the case.

    The Cato Institute in their Cato At Liberty site in a November 24, 2025 post finds “5% of people detained by ICE have violent convictions, 73% no convictions.

    The site Factually in their January 16, 2026 study of the issue found that;
    “The clearest, supported answer is that estimates vary by source and definintion:
    DHS messaging and some local arrest tallies claim about70% of recent ICE arrests involve people with criminal records or pending charges, but multiple independent datasets and analyses of ICE detention files for late 2025 show roughly 69-75% of people in detention have no criminal conviction and only about 5% had violent convictions; reconcilliation of these claims requires standardized, transparant breakdowns from ICE that separate convictions, pending charges, immigration-only offenses, and international warrents – data that public releases to date do not consistently provide.”

    Check out both sites for details.

All topics and opinions welcome! No mocking or personal criticism of other commenters. No profanity, explicitly racist or sexist language allowed. Real, full names are now required. All comments without real full names will be unapproved or trashed.