Addison County

Parents challenge gender ideology instructional materials at Mary Hogan Elementary School

By on • ( 15 Comments )
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Renee McGuinness

I attended the Addison County Supervisory District (ACSD) School Board meeting last night to listen to and comment on the materials reconsideration request submitted by two parents of a Mary Hogan Elementary school student who oppose gender ideology literature included in a kindergarten study unit called, “Who We Are.” 

This was a second school board meeting in which attendees provided public comment, at the encouragement of resident Amanda Reinhardt for people to “rally against a small group of parents spreading disinformation,” according to a December 12 article in the Addison Independent.

The seven books being challenged are: “They He She Me: Free to Be!” By Maya Christina Gonzales and Matthew Smith Gonzales; “Bodies are Cool” by Tyler Feder; “It Feels Good to Be Yourself” by Theresa Thorn; “Julian is a Mermaid” by Jessica Love; “Introducing Teddy” by Jessica Walton; “Sparkle Boy” by Leslea Newman; and “Fred Gets Dressed” by Peter Brown.

It was apparent that two worldviews are butting heads.

On one side, the scientific, biblically-based worldview that God – referred to as our Creator who endowed us with our unalienable rights in the Declaration of Independence, and who also, by the way, created science – created male and female, and that we can see the scientific evidence for this in the XX and XY chromosomes that result in female and male physical features, and can measure physiological and cognitive attributes according to sex and gender.

On the other side, an ideology claiming there are more than two genders, and that sex assigned at birth is not necessarily aligned with one’s own gender identity: an ideology in which children suffering from gender dysphoria self-diagnose their medical condition, while allies and members frequently use gender stereotypes to make their arguments.

Ed Wheeler of Middlebury provided succinct comment on the history of education moving from a moral framework based on Judeo-Christian values, to an academic curriculum void of any moral perspective, to a humanist perspective in which the Judeo-Christian perspective is “not being respected.”

Commenters that support gender ideology literature in public schools claimed that by removing such books from a Kindergarten curriculum, a small group of parents are “dictating” what other parents’ children are reading. 

This is nonsense. 

No one submitted a form to Mary Hogan Elementary in an effort to block parents from reading false gender ideology to their children in their own home, damaging their children in the process. 

Also false was the notion that a small minority is opposed to teaching gender ideology in public schools, when according to a Pew research poll from 2022, 60% of people believe gender is determined at birth; 58% think we should have laws that require trans athletes to complete on teams that match their biological sex; and 41% think it should be illegal for public schools to teach about gender identity in elementary schools; while 64% think that transgender people should be protected from discrimination in jobs, housing, and public spaces, yet only 27% think that health insurance companies should be required to cover medical expenses for gender transitions.

Vermont is uniquely, stubbornly, and ignorantly behind in current scientific conclusions on standards of care for children and youth who experience gender confusion. In Britain, hormone blockers for minors have been banned indefinitely.

Commenters in support of the gender ideology curriculum also inferred that if parents and community members do not support gender ideology being taught in public schools, then they do not care about transgender and gender diverse children and adults, that they are not viewed as “real people,” and that the only socially acceptable mindset toward children suffering from gender dysphoria is to accept their mental illness as a variety of one’s own personal reality, rather than heal the individual by affirming and celebrating the gender in which one is born.

It is, in fact, gender ideology proponents that want to force their beliefs on others in society.

It is the upholders and influencers of gender ideology that are confusing children, and in combination with the narrative that humans are an invasive species that are destroying the planet by using fossil fuels, and the “do what feels good, follow-your-own-heart” ideology that leaves children anchorless, ungrounded, confused, scared, hopeless, and without purpose, resulting in higher rates of anxiety, depression, suicidality, and self-harm, accounts of which were shared anecdotally by Middlebury resident  and Middlebury Teen Center Director, Lyndsey Fuentes George.

It is also false that proponents of the scientific-biblical worldview – which is banned in public schools, by the way – are the ones causing mental-emotional distress for gender dysphoric children by stating that hormone blockers, cross-sex hormones, and “top” and “bottom” surgeries are damaging, and that God has a better plan for them.

Fran Putnam from Weybridge claimed that most schools have policies that provide alternative lesson plans when parents object to material.

Lyndsey Fuentes George claimed that Franny Gould, the kindergarten teacher who is implementing the “Who We Are” curriculum, “let every parent know exactly what was happening.”

I will be following up on these claims with a FOIA records request to obtain the written communication Franny Gould sent to parents to notify parents of “Who We Are” curriculum content, opt-out forms, alternative lesson options, and the library materials selection and reconsideration policy in its entirety, including which book review organizations are used to curate classroom and school library materials.

Taxpayers have a stake in the curriculum used in schools in Vermont and across the U.S., because it is molding the minds of our future adult citizens, workers, and leaders.

This is yet the latest in our State, and our nation, trying to answer the question: Should the government, through its public school system, have more authority over a child’s personal development than the parents? For more on the topic, see Dave Soulia’s article on FYIVT: “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: School Edition”

The author is the Vermont Family Alliance Policy Analyst.

Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Addison County, Education

15 replies »

  1. This is all a part of the Critical Theory of Society, pushed by the likes of Communists Antonio Gramsci, Herbert Marcuse and Paulo Freire-to name a few-because it would be to cumbersome to list all the Communists in Vermont’s legislature. The goal is to deconstruct Western civilization, Natural Law and a transcendent God; and to usher in a Utopian, communist society through indoctrination and propaganda through our education and media systems.

    • “…to usher in a Utopian, communist society…” a society proven throughout history to be not only a false assertion but decidedly dangerous to those indoctrinated by its totalitarian puppet masters.

      “Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves.” Mathew 7:15

    • You’re describing “cultural Marxism,” an old conspiracy theory that goes all the way back to Nazi propaganda. Who told you this is true? And why do you believe them?

    • Real commies despise gays. Mengele, on the other hand, was cutting things off and rearranging things on children. Commies believe in something called queer, which is easy to discern when you look at the deliberately fugly people in society these days. It’s part of their performance art.

      Normal gay men have jobs, groom themselves, dress well, and even have good musical tastes. Just saying. Not sure about the lesbians so much.

  2. Keep using their tactics and grind them down.

    Then remember how we all got this way in the first place.

  3. I am delighted to see this conversation surfacing, both in the schools as being reported on, but also in the paper. There were displays at the State House last year of books like the ones mentioned in this article. There are agendas in Vermont that are interested in bringing the transgender sex education into early elementary grades in all Vermont schools.

    In Vergennes last year a parent used official forms to have her children be exempt from early education (1st and 3rd grade) and ran into serious conflict with the administration. They refused her parental rights. More on that story at this link with Ericka Redic interviewing the mother, Tara – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OoQGspKRUg&ab_channel=GenerallyIrritable

    Time for parental rights to be on the school ballots for Town Meeting Day has likely run out. It would have to be approved by the school board. There is still time to make it an item for voters to express their opinions as an item in on the town ballot. SPEAKVT circulated such a form and it can be downloaded from vthope.net/sos-posts.html (at the bottom) taken to your townhall to have legal language added by early January.

  4. Renee,
    Thank you for the excellent and diligent work you do, for your courage to call out this agenda from hell, to face head on those propagating this wickedness, and for the practical solutions you offer. Our Father always honors and supports those who stand up, speak up, and stick up for His precious children.

    • Thank you, Martin. Your encouragement and support is much appreciated. God bless you!

  5. There are only two genders or two sexes, male and female. Sex is determined at conception and from then on every cell in a persons body says if the person is male or female. You can’t change that. Young children should not be confused at school that they could be a different gender than they were at birth. A teacher at my first grade grandchild’s school informed the children that she was not a boy or a girl. She was a mix. The children could easily see she was a girl. I would like to thank the concerned parents for objecting to the false information being presented to the children. As human beings we are all unique and we should all be treated with respect. We do not have to pretend we are not what we were born. You may want to change gender or pretend you are an animal but you are not. You are a unique human being, special in every way and just what the world needs.

  6. Thank you for advocating for the truth and speaking on behalf of the opposing parents. I am one of the opposing parents. I asked that my child be excused from this lesson because it doesn’t follow our specific religious beliefs and is beyond the developmental level that my child is at. The ONLY solution that Jen Kravitz offered (I was told my daughter could not opt out this lesson) was to fill out a form to reconsider the materials in question. I never wanted to ban books as I knew that they may benefit other children. I was told this was my only option to exclude my daughter from this. I ended up pulling my daughter out of the school altogether because of the lengthy process of the decision and my child had already fallen behind in school. I feel that the school discriminated against us because we believe in God. I wonder how these parents would feel if Franny read them the Bible? The Bible is also a book that has a huge impact on people’s lives, yet can’t be mentioned in school. The Bible is a huge part of “who we are” yet was excluded from the lesson about “who we are.” They violated my parental rights by not allowing an opt out. They violated my child’s privacy rights by making this situation public, knowing my child has a legal protective order on file at the school that they should have been upholding. I have absolutely all correspondence with the school in writing if you’d like to examine this matter any further. Thank you!