Law Enforcement

No third trial for Sheriff Grismore

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Infamous Sheriff Grismore Kick

By Mike Donoghue | Vermont News First

NORTH HERO — Grand Isle County State’s Attorney Doug DiSabito said Monday afternoon that he does not plan to seek a third simple assault trial for Franklin County Sheriff John Grismore.

DiSabito said he has decided to dismiss the criminal charge that Grismore, while a deputy, kicked an intoxicated, unruly prisoner in the groin in August 2022.

“The case is now closed,” DiSabito told The Islander, which first broke the story Monday.

Two trials both ended with hung juries,  Judge Sam Hoar, after the second deadlock last Monday, said he would schedule a status conference hearing in November.

DiSabito said in a phone interview that he believed a third trial would not be in the best interests of the public.

DiSabito said he was preparing a written public statement that he would release later Monday about his decision.

He said after any hung jury a prosecutor needs to review the case and evaluate all the circumstances before deciding whether another trial would be a good use of public resources and in the interests of the public interest.

Defense lawyer Robert Kaplan said he had been told by DiSabito that the case was ending.  Kaplan said he would limit his comments until the court rules on the motion to dismiss.

Kaplan said the case really brought the focus on the public’s attitudes toward policing. He questioned whether 12 people would ever be able to agree on such a difficult issue.

He said Sheriff Grismore “is deeply appreciative” of the decision by the state to bring the case to a close and allow all parties to move on.

The case centered on Jeremy Burrows, then 42 of Winooski, who was drunk at 2:10 p.m. on Sunday Aug. 7, 2022 when his mother asked that he be removed from her St. Albans Town residence, officials said.

Burrows, now of Berlin, testified during both a pre-trial hearing and at two jury trials, but has admitted he did not remember much from the day due to his level of intoxication.

It took three deputies to deal with the combative man, who was eventually handcuffed and transported to the Franklin County Sheriff’s Office on Lake Street.

Burrows was shackled and handcuffed in a back room, but stood up and tried to walk away.  He fell on his face when he reached the end of the chain holding his legs.

After being helped back to his seat, Burrows stood up and Grismore used a foot to kick or push the prisoner back into his seat.  Burrows got a second kick or push when he stood up again, according to video of the incident.

Grismore, who was not at the initial scene, had come into the office on his day off to do paperwork.

DiSabito was asked to review the incident after then-Franklin County State’s Attorney John Lavoie disqualified his office because of their ongoing working relationship with Grismore and his office.

After a full review of the state police investigation, DiSabito determined a charge of simple assault was appropriate.

Grismore had pleaded not guilty to the charge.  He took the stand in both trials to defend his actions in coming to help two less experienced deputies with the prisoner.

In the end the two juries had trouble reaching agreement if the case was an unlawful assault or an acceptable police tactic under the circumstances by the then-chief deputy sheriff.

Then-Sheriff Roger Langevin fired Capt. Grismore after a short internal investigation.

Grismore, who was elected sheriff by Franklin County voters a few months after the incident, has continued to lead his department.

The Vermont Criminal Justice Council voted 15-1 to permanently decertify Grismore and strip him of his law enforcement authority last December.

DiSabito said he might have considered a third trial if the justice council had not taken action. The Vermont Legislature formed a special impeachment inquiry committee, but after many months of investigation and nearly $1 million in costs, the attempt was abandoned. The House Committee confirmed what had been said before they started: it would be difficult to impeach a duly elected sheriff for conduct before he was elected. The legislature did vote to lower Grismore’s pay becasue he is now uncertified.

Grismore is still free to oversee the day-to-day operations of his department and continue with tasks that do not need certification from the state, including the transporting of prisoners and court security.

The jury in the first trial in July was leaning 8-4 for conviction, but may have changed to 9-3 just before the deadlock was announced, according to sources familiar with the process.

This time the deadlock reportedly was 11-1 from about the start.

The case mostly boiled down to Grismore and his hired expert against the victim, the state’s hired expert and the two former deputy sheriffs involved in the arrest.

-30-

Statement of Grand Isle State’s Attorney Doug DiSabito issued later Monday afternoon:

“As State’s Attorney, I have one job, which is to do the right thing. I do not charge a case unless I believe the individual is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and I have the evidence to prove it. My decisions are based on the facts and the law, not emotions, ego, bias, or politics. Rest assured, that remained true in this case throughout.

After any mistrial, I review a case and evaluate all the circumstances and decide whether another trial is a good use of public resources and is in the interests of justice. I did that here and have determined that a third trial is not in the public interest.

Therefore, I am dismissing the case against Mr. Grismore.

As a result of the incident that led to this criminal case being filed, Mr. Grismore was decertified by the Vermont Criminal Justice Council, thereby stripping him of his law enforcement credentials. Had the Vermont CJC not taken this definitive action, the right thing in this matter would likely have been to take this to trial again. That will not be happening. This case is now closed.”


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Law Enforcement

6 replies »

  1. Now with the charges dismissed, it’s time to stop using the verb “kicked” and the anatomical reference “groin” to describe how a law enforcement officer persuaded a non-cooperative criminal suspect to take a seat. My observation is that he was pushed in the upper thigh by an officer’s foot for good reason, to allow him keep a safe distance from a suspect who had been spitting at the officers. This method of persuasion was the most likely to assure compliance with a lawful order that he be seated while minimizing any risk of injury to the suspect. Using his leg to do the persuading provided some extra distance to minimize the risk of Sheriff Grismore being further spat upon. Fortunately, as least one juror in each trial saw it that way. It is now time for the legislature to reinstate the full professional capacities of Sheriff Grismore. That one or more jurors used common sense to avoid a conviction in these trials gives a small ray of hope in the post-George Floyd/defund era of disrespect for law enforcement.

  2. “No third trial for Sheriff Grismore” There should not have been a first trial. When a suspect does not come into compliance after being instructed as to, and they disobey, what to do, what do you want law enforcement to do ? Give them a lollypop?

  3. Hope this is the last comment on this sheriff subject. How much money did the franklin county house and senate members make sucking off on the impeachment bull….????? We want them to pay back the taxpayers.

  4. Thank you VDC and Mike Donoghue for the thorough and informative article on the Sheriff Grismore case. Wow, the Vt Legislature spent more than a million dollars trying to impeach Sheriff Grismore when they were warned in advance that they would not be able to impeach him. And think of all the money spent on the two trials and hundreds of jurors. That’s a lot of money for a simple assault case. I certainly do not support police brutality but I did not see this as a case of police brutality. I saw this as a case of Sheriff Grismore taking swift action to stop an unruly person from hurting himself or the deputies who couldn’t seem to control the situation. People who deal with combative individuals know if any action is to be taken, it must be unannounced and without hesitation. I’m pretty sure the The Vermont Criminal Justice Council knows this and that it is disappointing that they stripped Grismore of his law enforcement credentials. The VCJC not only hurt Sheriff Grismore but they hurt all the people of Franklin County. I have lost all respect for Vermont Criminal Justice. The people of Franklin County voted for Sheriff Grismore and we deserve a Sheriff with full credentials. I’m glad the case has been dropped . I believe in justice for all but I do not think Sheriff Grismore got justice. I resent WCAX and WPTZ showing the “kick” over and over. The clip of the “kick should have never been released to the public. Thank you Sheriff Grismore for standing firm. We know it was not easy for you.

  5. Vermont’s anti-cop justice panel tried & tried but ” we ” all saw that the POS acting like the animal that he is, no respect for law enforcement, and apparently no respect for our laws, he’s lucky all he got was kicked…… that poor, poor criminal.

  6. Grand Isle County State’s Attorney Doug DiSabito should reimburse the taxpayers for the year of complete nonsense, this is the problem with progressive activist judges, no accountability