Education

Milton High School Board flunks new flagpole for political flags

By Michael Bielawski

In an apparent setback for Black Lives Matters activists, a proposal to erect a third flagpole dedicated to political/ ideological/ cause flags at Milton High School was voted down unanimously by the school board last Thursday night. Installing the third flag pole – as proposed unanimously by an advisory policy committee – would cost $4,500. Like many school districts, Milton is facing a large property tax increase. “That’s a lot of money in a very tight budget year,” one Milton resident wrote to Vermont Daily Chronicle.

Board Chair Kumilia Long has proposed limiting flags to Vermont and U.S. flags only on the existing two flagpoles. 13 community members attended the meeting Thursday to express support for Long’s proposal. Several were veterans, most of them spoke to the board. 

The ‘third pole’ proposal was put forth as an alternative to banning political/ideological flags on the two existing poles. The BLM flag has been flying since the movement gained increased prominence after the 2020 killing of George Floyd. Just 28% of students still want the Black Lives Matter to fly on the school flag pole, a student representative reported the results of a poll to the school board.

Five students, led by teacher Peter Wyndorft, attended the meeting in support of the third pole. They presented a petition which they said was signed by 147 students. 

Allison Duquette, a former school board candidate, writes summaries of each meeting. She shared her report with VDC. She details how during public comment impassioned supporters and critics each made statements concerning the flag policy.

Later in the meeting, an anonymous survey revealed where students stand on the matter of having an extra flagpole for student causes: most students do not want it.

The survey asked three questions: Do the students want the flagpole? Would they use it? The third asked for more feedback.

Duquette summarized the methodology.

“This was an online anonymous survey that was emailed twice to all students. About 30% of the student body, 140 students, took the survey. A plurality of those answered “No” to question one at almost 44%,” she wrote.

The remaining respondents were split between neutral and yes at about 28% each.

She continued, “A majority of the students, 64%, who took the survey answered “No” to question two, 24% were neutral and only 11% said “Yes”. 

She summarized more of the feedback. She wrote, “Only 52 students answered question three and the frequent themes of those answers were only wanting the US and VT flags, feeling that one flagpole is sufficient, concern for division, and liking the idea of a student interest flagpole.”

Concerned resident Mary Callahan spoke with VDC by phone on Thursday earlier in the day. She shared some of the email exchanges that took place between her and local community leaders.

Even before learning about the survey, she questioned the narrative that the community wants the BLM flag flown at the school.

“When we have members of the school board who refuse to speak up either for or against the BLM flag and give their reasons, it’s a sign of the same old song and dance that the board is really just a prop and not there for accountability and thus, not there for the children,” she wrote.

Callahan questions what the public benefit of having the BLM flag up at the school.

“Nobody on the select board or the school board could give me one single example of ‘systemic racism’ that occurs today in my town and not one single person on either board could give me one example that I could measure that showed me the benefit of displaying the BLM flag on classroom’s for kids as young as fifth grade? Somehow, we just go along with it. Why?”

She also wrote that extreme ideologies are teaching children to feel bad.

“We are forcing our kids to be ashamed of who they are and where they come from INCLUDING those kids who are family members of law enforcement or Jewish children and families in our community and Muslims in our community for that matter. We make a spectacle of every single thing, we make categories and division,” she wrote.

Part of Duquette’s summary of the public comments touched upon this matter.

“Susan, community member, supported Chairman (Kumilia) Long’s original proposal and told a story of being at the grocery store and overhearing young children telling each other that they hate each other because they are white,” she wrote.

Milton High is not the only school debating whether to bring down its BLM flag, members of the Champlain Valley School District School Board are considering taking theirs down as well. Some residents including people of color have suggested that it’s time the flags come down.

The author is a reporter for the Vermont Daily Chronicle


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

14 replies »

  1. There is something about this story that gives me great hope. Kumilia Long’s leadership as school board chair, the diligent involvement of community members, the common sense of the students to reject divisive tactics, the board’s wise decision and the deep digging reporting of Mr. Bielawski.

  2. Good for Milton High School. It is time for the BLM flag and the entire corrupt BLM movement to end, period, stop, end of story.

  3. Why are schools in Vermont flying flags of an organization that promotes violence against law enforcement? They should all be taken down, if not by the school then by the people.

  4. The only flag that should be flying at our public schools is the stars & stripes of these United States………………

    For all these liberal school masters, what to fly a flag for a cause, fly it at your house,
    that way your neighbors will know who you support, but you won’t because you are hypocrites !!

    For all these Black Lives Matter crusaders, did you spend any time in Chicago with all the black-on-black bloodletting, Nah hypocrites, or fools !!

  5. If the school wouldn’t fly “Don’t Tread On Me” or “Make America Great Again” it might be violating the First Amendment.

  6. The Flag of the United States defends the smallest group of people from oppression, the group of one individual. It defends all individuals by the rule of law.

    This is why our forefathers abhorred a democracy and it can’t be found in any original documents. We democratically elect people to defend our constitutional republic.

    The BLM flag represents a group of people, some investigation might be needed to find out which group of people they represent, it may not be as they claim, follow the money and the actions.

    Flying a flag of any group within the United States does so at the expense of other groups, by voting away the rights of other groups, we strengthen another. By strengthening the individuals, we strengthen our country.

    We might be wise to defend our constitution, because it protects all of us from being voted off the island, despite how popular a show may be, that’s not how our country works, that’s not how mankind flourishes.

  7. Correct yourself, Mike: Should be “death of George Floyd” – it was not a killing.

  8. That flag MUST be removed immediately, those that put it up lose their job. It is un-American, divisive, racist , black supremist and just plain wrong with a very wrong connotation; not denotation.

  9. BLM was never about race or racism, only truly uninformed people believe that. It’s about Maoism, division and hating your neighbor. It’s a war on westernism, and specifically here, Americanism. We should be educating our children about all the danger and historical travestys communism has produced. Why aren’t we AOE, VSBA?

  10. Shurtleff v Boston
    On May 2, 22 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Boston had discriminated when it refused to raise the banner of a Christian group on a city flagpole. That case has clear-cut ramifications for schools if they allow one flag — and not another — to fly on campus.

    A concerned lawyer stated – with Shurtleff v Boston. it’s either all or none. No additional flags can fly with American flags or as many as want their flags on the pole can be there as well. The link below is a review of the ruling.

    https://harvardlawreview.org/2022/11/shurtleff-v-boston/