|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
By Michael Bielawski
Dr. Douglass Frank, who has been at the forefront of a nationwide election integrity movement, is coming to Middlebury this Saturday for a 7-hour event titled “Elections: Are They Secure?”.
He has since earned the nickname, the “Johnny Appleseed of Election Integrity.” The event will take place 9-4 at Valley Bible Church in Middlebury this coming Saturday, Aug. 17.
According to the event flier, Frank – in addition to being a Nobel Prize-nominated physicist – has met with “Dozens of Secretaries of States, Attorney Generals, Legislators, and Hundreds of Local Election Officials.” He’s also testified at legal and legislative hearings, discovered algorithms used for manipulating elections, has been featured in two documentary films by filmaker/entrepreneur Mike Lendell on election fraud, and more.
Trouble with the voter rolls?
He was in Vermont in 2023 to talk about election fraud. As reported by True North Reports, he gave examples of statistical anomalies now common in U.S. elections, especially concerning voter rolls.
The report states, “For example, he emphasized that all states’ voter rolls — including Vermont’s — are growing at a faster pace than the actual population. In some cases, the rolls are now larger than the listed population.”
He talked about how they are growing despite efforts to keep them clean. The report states, “He also demonstrated that all over the nation, including in Vermont, there’s a pattern that voter rolls are substantially purged right after each election, but then before the next election almost that same number of voters is restored. Frank claimed social justice groups sue states to get the voter rolls restocked.”
The report indicated that Frank said he would be back to Vermont with new data to share.
Observed signature-verified hand counts
The TNR report also features former military fraud detector Col. Shawn Smith, who explained how electronic voting machines – despite claims to the contrary by Vermont’s Secretary of States Office – are in fact vulnerable to manipulation that can impact election outcomes.
Smith said that one essential component to honest elections is to require that ballots are handcounted, and that must be done with certain protocols including chain-of-custody controls and signature verifications.
“It’s only where we do hand counts that we get real counts of the election totals,” Smith said.
Election security discussed on VT talk radio today
Greg Thayer, candidate for Lt Governor in the Republican Primary, appeared on the Morning Drive on Friday to discuss the day’s primary elections. The discussion quickly turned to election integrity, both the host and guest had concerns.
“We have two different voting systems,” the host Kurt Wright said. “I’m not a fan of the all-mail-in ballot voting system, I’m just not. But nonetheless, that’s what the legislature has implemented.”
He further noted that because voters are automatically getting ballots in the mail for November’s election but not the primaries in August, that might create confusion and cause more people not to vote in the primaries. Thayer agreed with that sentiment.
The whole conversation which continues onto other matters can be heard here.
Americans divided on election integrity
Public polling is illustrating that Americans in general are becoming increasingly skeptical about election integrity. Rasmussen did a poll in December of 2023 in which one-in-five Americans admitted to cheating in the 2020 election with mail-in ballots.
Another poll also by Rasmussen from April 2023 revealed that the majority of Americans now believe fraud is impacting federal elections. It states that “60% of Likely U.S. voters think it is likely that cheating affected the outcomes of some races in last year’s midterm elections, including 37% who say it’s Very Likely. Thirty-five percent don’t believe it’s likely the 2022 midterms were affected by cheating, including 20% who think it’s Not At All Likely.”
The reporter is an author for the Vermont Daily Chronicle
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Elections
Add to the picture that Dr. Frank has already painted of how computer tampering can skew results without anyone poll observer detecting fraud, the story that surfaced last Friday about Smartmatics. Smartmatics is the company that owns the software patents for Dominion voting machines.
Do we really want this company to be anywhere near our voting machines? Below is the article. Can they be moved out of Vermont before November?
Smartmatic Executives Charged in Alleged Bribery Scheme in the Philippines NPR, AUGUST 9, 2024,
The president and two executives of the voting machine company Smartmatic are facing federal charges tied to allegations of bribing the former top election official in the Philippines.
Federal prosecutors in Miami allege that between 2015 to 2018, Roger Alejandro Pinate Martinez, 49, a Venezuelan citizen, Florida resident and co-founder and president of Smartmatic and Jorge Miguel Vasquez, 62, a Smartmatic executive based in Florida, paid Juan Andres Donato Bautista, 60, at least $1 million in bribes during his time as chairman of the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) from 2015 to 2017.
The alleged goal to bribe Bautista was to win business tied to providing voting machines and election services for the 2016 elections in the Philippines, prosecutors said. They allege the men over-invoiced the cost per voting machine for the 2016 Philippine elections and used slush funds and coded language to hide payments.
The story goes on to tell of other plots affecting other countries.
https://www.npr.org/2024/08/09/nx-s1-5069756/smartmatic-alleged-bribery-scheme-elections-philippines
all true, wish Americans were smart enough to understand how TRUMP WON, I’ll be there in MIddlebury, with all those pro Palestinian liberal elites that will obviously try to disrupt another truth speaker
bribery and blackmail are a dirty business//// the story about dominion voting machines is well known////
Check This Out: https://ericstates.org/about/
How many Vermonters Trust ERIC, INC.? A Secretary of State or DMV should never send their Voter Rolls, DMV Records, Death Certificates to an outside Party, let alone one in Washington, DC. The possibility for Major Voter Roll Fraud is ripe!
I wonder how many Vermont citizens or for that matter any American Citizens would willingly want their State’s Voter Rolls or private DMV records sent to this place? ZERO.
Member States: WHICH STATES ARE MEMBERS OF ERIC?
Alaska
Arizona
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Georgia
Illinois
Kentucky
Maine
Massachusetts
Maryland
Michigan
Minnesota
Nevada
New Jersey
New Mexico
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Utah
Vermont
Washington
and Wisconsin
The District of Columbia is also a member.
This is What They Claim, AND, they are located in Washington D.C. ERIC OVERVIEW
Member states securely submit voter registration and motor vehicle department data to ERIC. ERIC is also certified to use official death data from the Social Security Administration and subscribes to change of address data from the United States Postal Service.
Utilizing these four data sources, ERIC provides its members with reports that identify inaccurate or out-of-date voter registration records, deceased voters, individuals who appear to be eligible to vote but who are not yet registered, and possible cases of illegal voting.
In compliance with federal and state laws, members use these reports to contact voters for the purposes of updating their record or to remove ineligible and deceased voters from the rolls. Members also contact likely eligible but not yet registered individuals, providing information on how best to register. Possible cases of illegal voting are reviewed and, if found credible, referred to law enforcement.
“signature-verified” is asinine, impractical, and can easily be used as a tool to fix the vote.
IF we would use something like this, every single unverified signature should be accompanied by a police report, full investigation, and treated just like any other serious crime. You mean to tell me that when they find incidents of fraudulent votes, the proper response should be “put in pile 2”? Get real.
After the investigation has been concluded, the vote should be counted towards the total post facto, and if it changes the outcome of the election, the position should be handed over to the rightful winner.
This process should be the same for every incidence of suspected vote fraud.
Mike Lendell? Filmmaker/entrepreneur? Do you mean Mike Lindell, the MyPillow guy being sued for millions?
I am with the group that strongly suspects the elections are fixed when needed.
ELIMINATE SECRET BALLOTS OR BUST