Education

House OKs school funding ‘fix’ with two new taxes, 15-18% property tax hike

By Guy Page

Despite a larger-than-usual number of absent legislators, the Vermont House yesterday gave preliminary approval to H.887, the proposed public education funding ‘fix’ that would reduce the coming fiscal year’s proposed statewide homestead property tax from 20% to 15%.

Rep. Carolyn Branagan

H.887 emerged last week from the House Ways & Means Committee, where it was deemed necessary because 30 school districts rejected their budgets at Town Meeting and 13 have since rejected revised budgets. The bill is scheduled for a final House vote today, and then will proceed to the Senate. It is unknown whether it will clear the Senate before next week’s April 30 Super Tuesday of 11 school districts voting for a revised budget. 

The tsunami of No votes happened after voters realized they were being asked to approve an unprecedented statewide property tax increase caused by inflation, increases in staff pay and health benefits, the loss of one-time federal pandemic-era funding, and a funding formula that critics say rewards school districts for loading up on spending.

One veteran lawmaker last week called voters’ response a “tax revolt.”

“Taxpayer revolt. An old fashioned revolt,” Rep. Carolyn Branagan (R-Georgia/Fairfax, both Double No towns) said last Thursday after voting against H.887 in the Ways & Means committee. “And we’re due for it. I mean, this has gone on for a long time. The property taxes have been too high.”

Today, Gov. Phil Scott was asked if we’re in the midst of a tax revolt. “Yeah, I don’t think we’ve seen anything like this in some time,” he said. “It was too big a pill to swallow. People can relate to an increase in their property taxes when they’re just be scraping now. This was foreseeable in some respects, this cliff. It hasn’t fixed itself. The taxpayers are voicing their displeasure.”

Vermont has no specific advocacy group opposing taxation. However, on Thursday, a diverse coalition of Vermonters opposed to tax increases and other legislative initiatives plans to gather in the State House.

“Vermont Values Under ATAX” event will be a “non-partisan show of opposition to a variety of bills that are taxing to all Vermonters.” The organizers, the Vermont Traditions Coalition, promised “a protest/rally that cannot be ignored by politicians and media.”

The group urged all interested Vermonters to gather in the State House cafeteria and throughout the State House from 9-3 Thursday April 25 to “voice our displeasure with the direction of political leadership forsaking Vermont’s marginalized voices–working Vermonters and our children, those living with the land, our natural communities, and those seeking independence from the taxing and controlling interests currently dominating Vermont politics.”

In addition to the 15% property tax, H887 finds the revenue needed for the estimated $200 million education spending increase by creating two new categories of taxes: a ‘Cloud’ tax on internet services, and a tax on short-term rentals. It also increases the non-homestead (second home, business, apartment house) property tax to 18%. 

The four Republicans on Ways & Means at first backed H887, because it promised mid-term and long-term spending reductions. However, those provisions were stripped out of the final draft, and they all voted against it. On the floor, not a single Republican voted Yes. Three Republicans were absent. 

The bill proposes a 21-person panel to study education funding reform, but does not recommend or propose spending reductions. 

16 legislators were absent from the H.887 roll-call vote, which passed 94-38. The roll call appears below:

Arrison of WeathersfieldAbsent
Bartholomew of HartlandAbsent
Black of EssexAbsent
Brady of WillistonAbsent
Burditt of West RutlandAbsent
Campbell of St. JohnsburyAbsent
Graham of WilliamstownAbsent
Graning of JerichoAbsent
Holcombe of NorwichAbsent
Howard of Rutland CityAbsent
Oliver of SheldonAbsent
Parsons of NewburyAbsent
Pearl of DanvilleAbsent
Sammis of CastletonAbsent
Templeman of BrowningtonAbsent
White of BethelAbsent
Bartley of FairfaxNay
Beck of St. JohnsburyNay
Branagan of GeorgiaNay
Brennan of ColchesterNay
Canfield of Fair HavenNay
Clifford of Rutland CityNay
Corcoran of BenningtonNay
Demar of EnosburghNay
Dickinson of St. Albans TownNay
Donahue of NorthfieldNay
Elder of StarksboroNay
Galfetti of Barre TownNay
Goslant of NorthfieldNay
Gregoire of FairfieldNay
Hango of BerkshireNay
Harrison of ChittendenNay
Higley of LowellNay
Hooper of RandolphNay
Labor of MorganNay
LaBounty of LyndonNay
Laroche of FranklinNay
Lipsky of StoweNay
Maguire of Rutland CityNay
Marcotte of CoventryNay
Mattos of MiltonNay
McCoy of PoultneyNay
McFaun of Barre TownNay
Morgan of MiltonNay
Morrissey of BenningtonNay
Page of Newport CityNay
Peterson of ClarendonNay
Quimby of LyndonNay
Shaw of PittsfordNay
Taylor of MiltonNay
Toof of St. Albans TownNay
Walker of SwantonNay
Williams of GranbyNay
Smith of DerbyNay*
Krowinski of BurlingtonNot Voting
Andrews of WestfordYea
Andriano of OrwellYea
Anthony of Barre CityYea
Austin of ColchesterYea
Berbeco of WinooskiYea
Birong of VergennesYea
Bluemle of BurlingtonYea
Bongartz of ManchesterYea
Bos-Lun of WestminsterYea
Boyden of CambridgeYea
Brownell of PownalYea
Brumsted of ShelburneYea
Burke of BrattleboroYea
Burrows of West WindsorYea
Buss of WoodstockYea
Carpenter of Hyde ParkYea
Carroll of BenningtonYea
Casey of MontpelierYea
Chapin of East MontpelierYea
Chase of ChesterYea
Chase of ColchesterYea
Chesnut-Tangerman of Middletown SpringsYea
Christie of HartfordYea
Cina of BurlingtonYea
Coffey of GuilfordYea
Cole of HartfordYea
Cordes of LincolnYea
Dodge of EssexYea
Dolan of Essex JunctionYea
Dolan of WaitsfieldYea
Durfee of ShaftsburyYea
Emmons of SpringfieldYea
Farlice-Rubio of BarnetYea
Garofano of EssexYea
Goldman of RockinghamYea
Headrick of BurlingtonYea
Hooper of BurlingtonYea
Houghton of Essex JunctionYea
Hyman of South BurlingtonYea
James of ManchesterYea
Jerome of BrandonYea
Kornheiser of BrattleboroYea
Krasnow of South BurlingtonYea
Lalley of ShelburneYea
LaLonde of South BurlingtonYea
LaMont of MorristownYea
Lanpher of VergennesYea
Leavitt of Grand IsleYea
Logan of BurlingtonYea
Long of NewfaneYea
Masland of ThetfordYea
McCann of MontpelierYea
McCarthy of St. Albans CityYea
McGill of BridportYea
Minier of South BurlingtonYea
Morris of SpringfieldYea
Mrowicki of PutneyYea
Nicoll of LudlowYea
Notte of Rutland CityYea
Noyes of WolcottYea
Nugent of South BurlingtonYea
O’Brien of TunbridgeYea
Ode of BurlingtonYea
Pajala of LondonderryYea
Patt of WorcesterYea
Pouech of HinesburgYea
Priestley of BradfordYea
Rachelson of BurlingtonYea
Rice of DorsetYea
Satcowitz of RandolphYea
Sheldon of MiddleburyYea
Sibilia of DoverYea
Small of WinooskiYea
Squirrell of UnderhillYea
Stebbins of BurlingtonYea
Stevens of WaterburyYea
Surprenant of BarnardYea
Taylor of ColchesterYea
Toleno of BrattleboroYea
Torre of MoretownYea
Troiano of StannardYea
Waters Evans of CharlotteYea
Whitman of BenningtonYea
Williams of Barre CityYea
Wood of WaterburyYea
Arsenault of WillistonYea*
Brown of RichmondYea*
Conlon of CornwallYea*
Demrow of CorinthYea*
Mihaly of CalaisYea*
Roberts of HalifaxYea*
Scheu of MiddleburyYea*
Sims of CraftsburyYea*
Stone of Burlington

Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Education

10 replies »

  1. Going from 20% to 15% is not an answer. Time to cut fat. To a school system that teacher / student ratio is the highest in the country. Feeding programs that feed all students. The massive school administration we have state wide. The money tree in taxpayers back yard is empty.

  2. Party line or die – let it be so. The sixteen no-shows wouldn’t make a difference and doesn’t shelter them from the storm either way. Operation Tincup appears to have no bottom, but it does have an ending after inflicting a whole lot of damage upon our State and communities. We all ready see it and feel it.

  3. As in yesterday’s article showing us the Return on Investment that VPIRG enjoys with it’s campaign contributions- so too does the VNEA Teachers and a cabal of tax-exempt NGO corporations lobbying on behalf of Education Spending. There are millions of dollars at stake in this battle for dollars, at the expense of actual education of students.
    I would remind all that $30,000,000.00 of the $200,000,000.00 is for “free school lunch” for all, regardless of ability to pay. That “free school lunch” program is yet another gimmick to appease certain voting groups- much like joe biden has done with student loan forgiveness. There is a substantial block of voters that are easily influenced, using emotion- not facts and logic to support these bloated budgets and the graft surrounding education spending in Vermont.
    Fact are facts- and ignore these facts or not, Vermont spends the most tax dollars per student with a mediocre or poor education outcome for students.
    In the same way as the Climate Change™ groups have a chokehold on Vermont’s people and economy- Education Spending and the groups behind it have an equal chokehold.

  4. By the way – Weren’t these the very folks who decades ago coined the term “No means NO!”

    So, Montpelier – in BOTH instances – NO means unequivocally NO!

  5. now i wonder who will be on the twenty one person panel to study education reform/// the queen of franklin county vermont calls for a tax revolt//// how is she connected to the education cartel//// sorry, you screwed up on the covid kill shot with no objection/// all house members and senators in franklin county should be fired at the ballot box///////////

  6. promised mid-term and long-term spending reductions“, even if that had remained in the bill does anyone really think that would happen? They would weasel out of it somehow.

    increases the non-homestead (second home, business, apartment house) property tax to 18%“. So they’ll stick it to the renters this time around, as if rent wasn’t high enough already. All those renters who don’t pay attention to the fact that property taxes effect them and that think it’s just the evil landlord sticking it to them better wake up. As for the homesteaders, they’ll be back for you next year.

    • Paul, yes all those renters SHOULD pay attention and stop thinking that schools are free just because they don’t own a home. Then, maybe then they’ll start helping to vote down school budgets.

  7. “The tsunami of No votes happened after voters realized they were being asked to approve an unprecedented statewide property tax increase caused by inflation, increases in staff pay and health benefits, the loss of one-time federal pandemic-era funding, and a funding formula that critics say rewards school districts for loading up on spending.”
    Increases in staff pay: if the districts wouldn’t allow themselves to be held hostage by the NEA, teachers could be told, sorry you won’t be getting pay increases, there is no money in the budget for that now. Fact: I went for eight years with only two raises as did everyone else at the company, the reason…no money in the budget.
    Increases in health benefits: healthcare premiums go up, employees eat the cost, not the employer (taxpayers). Fact: when healthcare insurance premiums went up at my company the employees insurance premium went up. Also we didn’t have golden policies, we as the insured shouldered a large portion not only in premiums but also deductibles.
    Loss of one time federal pandemic-era funding: ONE TIME! For those legislators who flunked English (apparently most) one time means, wait for it…ONE TIME. That means that you don’t create spending that will need to be sustained, get it??? Are we supposed to jump for joy because they got it from 20% to 15%??? Sorry Montpelier, it’s too little too late. Throw the bums out November.

  8. the lock down//// the currency reset//// the federal reserve///// more inflation/// the covid scam demic/// population control//// any questions//// there are a lot of answers//// you have to have an inquiring mind/// their is life outside vermont