by Robert Fireovid
At this point, you all probably have seen this message that Democrats rolled out yesterday…
Did the Democrats hatch this plan before yesterday’s altercation?
Since I was at the altercation, you need to hear a few things about what actually happened…
- The leader of the protesters brought in and used a microphone with a speaker/amplifier to take control of the room BEFORE the lawful assemblers even started. This person needs to be identified and investigated.
- The lawful assemblers exercised great restraint and did not physically interfere in any way with the protestors.
- After the altercation started, the Sergeant-at-Arms, Agatha Kessler, addressed everyone in the room (to tell them that they all had to vacate the room) and said this first… “Unfortunately, but maybe fortunately…” What on Earth did she mean by that?
- The leader of the protestors was grinning ear-to-ear when the Sergeant-at-Arms said that she was kicking everyone, including those who were lawful assemblers, out of the room. She had successfully shut down a lawful assembly. And it appears that the Sergeant-at-Arms was complicit in protestors’ effort to shut down a lawful assembly.
- The Democrats are lying. The lawful assemblers had no plans to say anything against people who identify as transgender. Rather, they were going to hear from people who formerly identified as transgenders, but later found that doing so hurt them (https://vermontdailychronicle.com/detrans-awareness-day-event-organizer-explains-what-trans-disrupters-prevented-her-from-saying/).
The protestors violated Vermont statute…
Title 13 : Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter 019 : Breach of the Peace; Disturbances
Subchapter 004 : OTHER DISTURBANCES OF THE PEACE
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 1026)
- § 1026. Disorderly conduct
(a) A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if he or she, with intent to cause public inconvenience or annoyance, or recklessly creates a risk thereof:
(1) engages in fighting or in violent, tumultuous, or threatening behavior;
(2) makes unreasonable noise;
(3) in a public place, uses abusive or obscene language;
(4) without lawful authority, disturbs any lawful assembly or meeting of persons; or
(5) obstructs vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
(b) A person who is convicted of disorderly conduct shall be imprisoned for not more than 60 days or fined not more than $500.00, or both. A person who is convicted of a second or subsequent offense under this section shall be imprisoned for not more than 120 days or fined not more than $1,000.00, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 222 (Adj. Sess.), § 5, eff. April 5, 1972; 2013, No. 150 (Adj. Sess.), § 3.)
The Sergeant-at-Arms aided-and-abetted protestors to violate Vermont Statute and possibly Federal Civil Rights Law. She needs to be fired for incompetence and possible criminal conspiracy.
Republican legislators need to blast Democrats for aiding-and-abetting protestors to violate Vermont Statute, to censor lawful free speech in our State House, and to possibly violate Federal Civil Rights Law. The Democrats are complicit in bringing mob rule to our State House.
I think it’s very likely that the Vermont Legislature will be sued by the U.S. Department of Justice for violating citizens’ First Amendment Rights. I hope that you and every Republican legislator will strongly support the Constitutional rights of your constituents.