Antony Blinken explained that well at a press conference which got almost no coverage.
by Tom Evslin
Here are excerpts from CNN:
Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Wednesday called out other countries for not demanding Hamas surrender.
“What is striking to me is that even as, again, we hear many countries urging the end to this conflict, which we would all like to see, I hear virtually no one saying – demanding of Hamas that it stop hiding behind civilians, that it lay down its arms, that it surrender. This is over tomorrow if Hamas does that. This would have been over a month ago, six weeks ago, if Hamas had done that,” Blinken said during a press briefing at the State Department Wednesday.
“How can it be that there are no demands made of the aggressor and only demands made of the victim,” Blinken went on to say.
Thestrongcomments from Blinken come as the United Nations Security Council continues to negotiate a resolution calling for a suspension in fighting and encouraging more humanitarian aid into the beleaguered Gaza Strip, and as the United States’ support for the resolution remains unresolved…
Blinken noted in the briefing that “understandably, everyone would like to see this conflict end as quickly as possible,” but, he observed, “if it ends with Hamas remaining in place and having the capacity and the stated intent to repeat October 7th again and again and again, that’s not in the interests of Israel, it’s not in the interests of the region, it’s not in the interests of the world.”
The US has vetoed previous measures at the UNSC and voted against a call for a ceasefire in the larger UN General Assembly earlier this month.
The US, Israel’s strongest ally, has repeatedly condemned the Hamas attack that killed more than 1,200 people October 7. But the mounting civilian death toll in Gaza from Israel’s response has prompted top US officials, including President Joe Biden, to urge Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to take more meaningful steps to protect innocent lives while waging his war against Hamas…
The secretary acknowledged “the last couple of months have been gut-wrenching when you see the suffering of men, women, and especially children in Gaza,” and the administration, he said, has focused on “doing everything possible to minimize the harm to those who are caught in a crossfire of Hamas’ making.”
“And again, I come back to this basic proposition. There seems to be silence on what Hamas could do, should do, must do if we want to end the suffering of innocent men, women, and children. It would be, I think, good if the world could unite around that proposition as well,” he said.
Thank you, Secretary Blinken.

The author, an author, entrepreneur, former Vermont state cabinet officer, lives in Stowe. He founded NG Advantage, a natural gas truck delivery company. This commentary is republished with permission from his blog, Fractals of Change.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Commentary, National/International News









“The secretary acknowledged “the last couple of months have been gut-wrenching when you see the suffering of men, women, and especially children in Gaza,” and the administration, he said, has focused on “doing everything possible to minimize the harm to those who are caught in a crossfire of Hamas’ making.””
Yet, the same sentiments do not apply to citizens of the Ukraine, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, or the ones pouring over the Southern Border. The war machine is lucrative for those playing both sides of the fence. Whichever side the USA administration and Congress states they support, the money and weapons are being supplied to both sides. The defense contracts and stock options make tidy profits for those in the know (wink, wink.)
Surrender? And then what? Regroup to cast, directly or indirectly, more gut-wrenching havoc on women and children another day?
The not-so-subtle logical flaw in Blinken’s and Evslin’s argument rests in the definition (or lack thereof) of the term ‘surrender’.
And what about the folks enabling Hamas? Must they ‘surrender’ too?
Surely, there must be some logical truth to facilitate a peaceful resolve. But I must admit, I haven’t been able to determine what that might be. And, apparently, neither Blinken nor Evslin have either. All I can say is, keep trying, but buckle your seatbelts.
see king luxury yachting////dark world of hamas///
You lost me at CNN…
More on point I read somewhere that they are attempting to create another Suez canal one that is controlled by the Israeli’s and the US. I think it saves 100’s of Billions of dollars if it goes through the Gaza strip. When you control both sides of a conflict you can get whatever you want right Bibbi?
https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-global/ben-gurion-canal-suez-israel-9021520/
Evslin, you never fail to miss the point….
Thank you for your comments.
Hamas won’t surrender. It cares nothing for masses of Palestinians.