Legislation

EV mileage fee begins 1/1/27 

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Comparable to gas tax, $$ will fund highway repair and maintenance

By Guy Page

H.488, the 2025-26 fiscal year transportation spending bill signed June 2 by Gov. Phil Scott, allocates $52 million for public transportation and sets January 1, 2027 as the start date for a highway use tax for electric vehicles.

The mileage based user fee for EVs resolves the ‘drive for free’ bone of contention between drivers of fossil-fuel powered cars, which are taxed at the pump for the construction and maintenance of Vermont highways and bridges, and drivers of EVs, which aren’t. Climate change hawks have resisted road tax efforts for years in the interests of promoting EV affordability. However, even the members of the House Transportation Committee who drive EVs say they’re happy to pay the fee – in part because they’re tired of being accused of not paying their share, House Transportation Committee Chair Matt Walker told VDC last month.

The newly-minted law adopts an amended version of the Agency of Transportation’s Proposed Fiscal Year 2026 Transportation Program, pending the availability of federal, state, and local funds. It outlines the State’s transportation investments for the upcoming fiscal year, with stated goals including reducing transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions, decreasing fossil fuel use, and saving Vermont households money. These efforts align with the goals of the Comprehensive Energy Plan and the Vermont Climate Action Plan, in furtherance of commitments to the Paris Agreement climate goals, the law says. 

Key programs receiving significant fiscal year 2026 expenditures, including local and federal funds where noted, are:

Public Transit Program, $52,695,234. This includes $380,000 for Go! Vermont to support transportation demand management strategies like the State’s Trip Planner and commuter services promoting carpools and vanpools. The Mobility and Transportation Innovations (MTI) Grant Program is authorized for $340,000, including $315,000 in federal funds, supporting projects to improve mobility and access for transit-dependent Vermonters, reduce single-occupancy vehicle use, and lower greenhouse gas emissions.

Rail Program: $61,887,348, including local funds and $31,894,436 in federal funds. These funds support intercity passenger rail services, including the Ethan Allen Express and Vermonter Amtrak services, as well as rail infrastructure for freight. Moving freight by rail can lower greenhouse gas emissions significantly compared to trucks. It deletes a Barre–Berlin–Montpelier project and adds the Hartford–White River Junction Depot Repairs project, authorized with $260,000 in State funds.

Bike and Pedestrian Facilities Program: $21,879,965 includes a local match. This funding supports 33 construction projects and 17 design or right-of-way projects for future construction, plus 10 scoping studies across numerous Vermont towns. The projects aim to create, improve, or rehabilitate walkways, sidewalks, shared-use paths, bike paths, and cycling lanes. Funding also supports Local Motion’s bike ferry on the Colchester Causeway, a small-scale municipal grant program, Safe Routes to School projects, and community grants along the Lamoille Valley Rail Trail.

Transportation Alternatives Program: $6,471,054, including local funds. This will fund 17 construction projects, 26 design or right-of-way projects, and eight scoping studies. Among these 51 projects, 20 address environmental mitigation related to clean water or stormwater, and 32 involve bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

Park and Ride Program: $2,435,740. This funding supports two construction projects for new park-and-ride facilities, improvements to two existing facilities, a municipal grant program, and paving projects. Specific projects include construction of 50 new spaces in Manchester and design and construction of 10 new spaces in Sharon, adding a total of 60 new state-owned spaces.

Town Highways. The program for Town Highway Non-Federal Disasters maintains $1,150,000 for grants in FY26. However, the source of funds shifts from state monies to amounts appropriated from the PILOT Special Fund.

For State Aid for Town Highway Structures and the Class 2 Town Highway Roadway Program, annual appropriations are set to increase based on a formula linked to changes in Transportation Fund revenues or the Consumer Price Index, whichever is less. Each fiscal year, the Agency is directed to approve new grants with a minimum total estimated State share cost of $7,200,000 for Structures and $8,600,000 for the Class 2 Program. Beginning in State fiscal year 2027, these minimum State share costs will increase by the same percentage as their respective program appropriations. Supplemental appropriations may be requested if expenditures exceed the appropriated amounts.

In line with efforts to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions, the act authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to spend up to $325,000.00 in remaining State Fiscal Year 2024 funds from the Electrify Your Fleet Program in FY26. These funds will continue the Agency’s partnership with Drive Electric Vermont, supporting stakeholder coordination, consumer education, infrastructure development, and technical assistance for municipal and business fleet electrification.

The Agency is also directed to make progress in designing a mileage-based user fee (MBUF). The General Assembly intends for the State to examine collecting a fee on electricity dispensed through certain public electric vehicle supply equipment. The Agency was authorized to apply for and accept a federal grant for designing the MBUF, with up to $350,000 in Transportation Fund monies authorized for the nonfederal match in FY24 and up to $350,000 in FY25. The design process will utilize State or federal funding authorized for this purpose. 

The intended start date for collecting a mileage-based user fee from battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) registered in Vermont is now January 1, 2027, subject to sufficient funding and legislative action establishing the fee amount and authorizing language. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that are pleasure cars will be subject to an increased annual or biennial registration electric vehicle infrastructure fee starting January 1, 2025, and will not be subject to a mileage-based user fee. The MBUF for BEV pleasure cars is intended to be approximately equivalent to the average fuel tax revenue collected from non-PEV and PHEV pleasure cars.

For medical transports, the act authorizes the Agency of Transportation to utilize up to $600,000 in one-time Transportation Fund monies for providing grants to public transit agencies to hire volunteer coordinators responsible for identifying, recruiting, and retaining volunteers for demand response transportation programs, including the Medicaid Non-Emergency Transportation program. The Department of Vermont Health Access is consulting with the Agency and other stakeholders on expanding the pool of volunteer drivers for the Medicaid program, examining how background checks currently impact potential volunteers.

Other provisions in the act include authorizing the relinquishment of a segment of Vermont Route 36 in St. Albans to the town, amending laws related to State-owned railroads and rail trails including establishing rules for interim trail use and prohibiting certain acts, requiring reports on lease revenues from communications infrastructure on railroad rights-of-way, updating the composition of the Transportation Board, and modifying the area of operation for the Green Mountain Transit Authority. The time frame for marking underground utility facilities after a Dig Safe notice has been extended from 48 to 72 hours.

Several reports are also mandated related to the administration of transportation programs, including a consultant study on the cancellation of locally managed projects, an assessment of municipal transportation assets and funding needs, and an evaluation of Town Highway Aid and municipal grant program efficiencies. The Department of Motor Vehicles will report on processes for issuing vehicle identification numbers to ultra-low volume motor vehicles, kit-cars, and homebuilt motor vehicles. A working group is also established to improve coordination between health care and transportation services.

The sections relating to Dig Safe took effect upon passage, while the remaining sections of the act are set to take effect on July 1, 2025.

This story was written with the assistance of Notebook LM.


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Legislation

15 replies »

  1. Take note of start date, another scam, they will soon be charging every one to drive, mark my words.

    • No doubt. It will only take one EV owner to take it to court and cry, “why should only we EV owners pay it?”

    • What’s wrong with starting January 1, 2026

      This fee is already being paid by those of us that drive gas/diesel vehicles. Electric vehicles drivers still drive on our roads and those vehicles are heavier! It’s not a scam, we shouldn’t have to pay for road maintenance and they should too!

    • We already pay to drive. The EV Fee is to help maintain roads just like the fee we pay for road maintenance…they absolutely should have to pay it. Their EV’s are much heavier than our vehicles

  2. Did those that bought EVs think the free ride would last forever ? Those of you that have wood stoves might think you are safe from the tax monster as well, but if there is one thing I’m sure of, it’s if the tax monster need “moe money” they are very inventive, and don’t care about where, or even how they get it. The end justifies the means. So enjoy the free ride as long as you can you’re next !

  3. It’s about time. Maybe more potholes on the roads will get filled in with the extra tax income. But then again this is Vermont. We may create another State Division to regulate and collect the new fees.

  4. “Climate change hawks have resisted road tax efforts for years in the interests of promoting EV affordability.” In other words, in the interest of hiding the full cost of buying and operating an EV!
    “However, even the members of the House Transportation Committee who drive EVs say they’re happy to pay the fee – in part because they’re tired of being accused of not paying their share, House Transportation Committee Chair Matt Walker told VDC last month.”
    “happy to pay” “because they’re tired of being accused of not paying their share”??? NOT because (apparently) it’s the RIGHT thing to do?!?!?!

    • As a member of he then PSB I appeared in front of the transportation committee to present my thoughts at the very beginning of the EV age. We really had none then . After addressing grid concerns, chargers depioyment and other concerns, I mentioned, as I was getting up to leave, that there would be growing impacts on the highway fund from the loss of gas tax revenues. It was clear to me and my staffer who came with me, that that consideration had never crossed their mind. That was probably 12 years ago. Didn’t pay much attention to me, did they!

    • We pay a fee for road maintenance when we buy our gas! You EV people with heavier vehicles can pay your far share too!

  5. I drive a Toyota Prius Prime, gas and electric. I charge it at home only. It’s a 2023 and has just over 10,000 miles on it. The 9volt battery has failed on it and the dealer told me in order to avoid this in the future I need to use more gasoline!?!? We are already being charged for the electricity usage for our home, now the state wants to charge us for using the car too when we’ve already paid for the electricity? Something doesn’t add up.

    • Because you still drive on our Vermont Roads and you should have to pay your share of road upkeep and repair. That’s what the fee is for! We pay it every time we put gas in our cars!

  6. Is there a grant for a sturdy mule, a solid standardbreed trotter with low mileage? Do they offer additional grants for a buggy and a few barrells of oats? Can they re-open the stagecoach stops and town stables for other alternative transportation options? Can we ride our stags and mares in the bike lane? They insist on pounding us back into the 1800’s – pretending they are not. Depopulation, wealth transfer, reset – same as it was and will be.

  7. I’m sure that some fuel tax money is getting diverted”special projects”. Equally confident that some road tax money will get diverted to “special projects”.

    • This fee better go towards road repairs! These vehicles are much heavier than regular cars and will do more damage to our roads!