Site icon Vermont Daily Chronicle

Despathy: Moving past the covid hysteria, settling back into the science

by Alison Despathy 

As the censorship stranglehold loosens, risks, impacts and new findings related to covid injections are surfacing.

Moving past the covid hysteria and settling back into the actual science, research continues to emerge on the experimental, synthetic biology, gene therapy covid injections. Evolving science has been there all along attempting truth, necessary debate and scrutiny. However, during covid, this integral process was criminally crushed by the government and Big Pharma working to guarantee–actually force–fast tracked, emergency use authorization and marketing of their ‘novel’ products.’

The degree of censorship placed on all opposition to lock downs and mandated covid injections was unprecedented. Opposition originating from the medical community and academia was silenced, ridiculed, even punished. World renowned, tenured professors, scientists, editors of medical journals, and medical professionals lost jobs, grants, funding, and reputations because they dare question the covid trajectory.

A large body of leading scientists and policy experts compiled a report not only questioning the safety of covid injections but also demanding a halt to the use of these experimental, gene therapy mRNA injections

    Alison Despathy

It is vital that this ongoing research is understood in order to prevent future mandated, experimental injections and coercive health measures. Upholding inalienable rights and ensuring individuals can make private, informed health decisions free of coercion now and always is paramount; the health of humanity depends on this. We must never allow Big Pharma to call the shots again.

Synthetic Biology in Covid Injections Causes Frameshifting

As recently reported from the University of Cambridge, “Researchers have discovered that misreading of therapeutic mRNAs by the cell’s decoding machinery can cause an unintended immune response in the body.”

According to this recent research from the Medical Toxicology Unit at the University of Cambridge and published in the journal Nature, one third of mRNA vaccine recipients in the cohort made abnormal proteins. Lead authors, biochemist Anne Willis and immunologist James Thaventhiran, discovered that in the current mRNA injections the chemically modified, synthetic genetic base known as N1-methylpsuedouridine triggers “slips” along the mRNA sequence. Also known as frameshifting–not a new dance move or cool photography app–, these “slips’ result in the production of abnormal, “off-target” proteins which results in unintended immune responses.

Billions of people around the world have received covid injections. For the past several years and still today, propaganda promises that mRNA vaccines are safe and effective, but what do we really know? The honest answer is not much and what has emerged does not look good and has been devastating for many.

These injections have contributed to myocarditis, pericarditis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), rampant autoimmune conditions, clotting disorders (thrombocytopenia syndrome), and now frameshifting. Experimentation on the people is the real covid injection story and these frameshifted abnormal proteins set the stage for increases in autoimmune disorders which continue to amass in the scientific literature.

Ann Willis, leading coauthor on the recent research coming out of Cambridge, stated, “As billions of pounds flow into the next set of mRNA treatments, it is essential that these therapeutics are designed to be free from unintended side-effects.” Does this sound safe and effective?

So much for safety, how about effective? Soon after the vaccines rolled out, it became evident that these injections were a failure and did not prevent disease or transmission. As the most vaccinated countries and states skyrocketed in cases, former CDC director, Rochelle Walensky announced this vaccine failure on CNN’s Situation Room on August 5, 2021. In reality, covid injections are unsafe and ineffective and new research continues to demonstrate their actual risks and harms

However, when you are Big Pharma and you have the money for high level marketing campaigns including commercials, celebrities, billboards, intense internet presence, reward giveaways, and coordinated censorship of opposition, anything is possible. Lies can temporarily become truth, nightmares can become reality. This is how propaganda works–all brought to you by Pfizer.

Criminal Covid Injection Recommendations

Criminally, covid vaccine boosters are currently recommended to everyone over 6 months in the United States. This recommendation differs greatly from the majority of other countries that took a cautious approach based on data indicating that the benefit:risk analysis was not justified for certain populations including healthy individuals, pregnant women or children.

Most countries offered recommendations emphasizing covid shots for the immunocompromised, elders and those with multiple comorbidities. Yet when assessing the fast tracked vaccine development, the lack of efficacy and the known and newly identified risks, it is easy to understand why a growing number of medical professionals, attorney generals and surgeon generals are urging regulators to halt these injections. Given the fact that there are a wide variety of peer -reviewed and effective treatment protocols that do not hold the risks associated with the mRNA injections, a halt is the only avenue.

According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Report dated for January 19, 2023, only 11% of children have received the recent covid vaccine, 21.5% for adults and 40.9% for those over 65. Relatively speaking, this is good news, these numbers are much lower than the CDC hoped for, apparently many are getting the unsafe and ineffective message loud and clear.

Lead coauthor and Cambridge toxicologist, Dr. James Thaventhrian stated ,”The safety concern of future mRNA medicines is that misdirected immunity has huge potential to be harmful, so off-target immune response should always be avoided.”

The authors of this frameshifting risk were sure to mention that there were no side effects observed in the mRNA vaccinated patients with an “unintended immune response.” from this abnormal protein production. BBC, NPR and the mainstream media echoed these claims all hoping to quiet the masses and ensure that the successful covid vaccine narrative survives.

However, within the scientific community itself, the reaction is altogether different and the demand for safety evidence, ongoing scrutiny of mRNA injections and a halt to their use continues. An immediate response on the UK frameshifting study provided by Wiseman et al states,

“The findings reveal a developmental and regulatory failure to ask fundamental questions that could affect the safety and effectiveness of these products. …. The finding that unintended proteins may be produced as a result of vaccination is sufficient cause for regulators to conduct full risk assessments of past or future harms that may have ensued….. We await their account of what steps they have taken to investigate why the formation of off-target proteins was not discovered sooner, what toxic effects they may have caused and what steps they are taking to prevent harm in the future and to inform the public of these findings.”

Recently retired head of Pfizer’s vaccine research and development team, Dr. Kathrin Jansen summed it up perfectly when she stated “ We flew the aeroplane while we were still building it.”

And let’s not forget, on top of this nightmare, so many were forced to “take the jab” or risk losing their job, their educational opportunity, and the acceptance of friends and family in many cases. Even access to society with the implementation of vaccine passports for failed, experimental injections was denied in the unvaccinated. Science and law take time to surface truth, we are now witnessing this process and we must do it with our eyes wide open. Sadly this will take decades while many suffer. And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

The author is a clinical nutritionist in St. Johnsbury.

Exit mobile version