by Alison Despathy
As the censorship stranglehold loosens, risks, impacts and new findings related to covid injections are surfacing.
Moving past the covid hysteria and settling back into the actual science, research continues to emerge on the experimental, synthetic biology, gene therapy covid injections. Evolving science has been there all along attempting truth, necessary debate and scrutiny. However, during covid, this integral process was criminally crushed by the government and Big Pharma working to guarantee–actually force–fast tracked, emergency use authorization and marketing of their ‘novel’ products.’
The degree of censorship placed on all opposition to lock downs and mandated covid injections was unprecedented. Opposition originating from the medical community and academia was silenced, ridiculed, even punished. World renowned, tenured professors, scientists, editors of medical journals, and medical professionals lost jobs, grants, funding, and reputations because they dare question the covid trajectory.
A large body of leading scientists and policy experts compiled a report not only questioning the safety of covid injections but also demanding a halt to the use of these experimental, gene therapy mRNA injections.
It is vital that this ongoing research is understood in order to prevent future mandated, experimental injections and coercive health measures. Upholding inalienable rights and ensuring individuals can make private, informed health decisions free of coercion now and always is paramount; the health of humanity depends on this. We must never allow Big Pharma to call the shots again.
Synthetic Biology in Covid Injections Causes Frameshifting
As recently reported from the University of Cambridge, “Researchers have discovered that misreading of therapeutic mRNAs by the cell’s decoding machinery can cause an unintended immune response in the body.”
According to this recent research from the Medical Toxicology Unit at the University of Cambridge and published in the journal Nature, one third of mRNA vaccine recipients in the cohort made abnormal proteins. Lead authors, biochemist Anne Willis and immunologist James Thaventhiran, discovered that in the current mRNA injections the chemically modified, synthetic genetic base known as N1-methylpsuedouridine triggers “slips” along the mRNA sequence. Also known as frameshifting–not a new dance move or cool photography app–, these “slips’ result in the production of abnormal, “off-target” proteins which results in unintended immune responses.
Billions of people around the world have received covid injections. For the past several years and still today, propaganda promises that mRNA vaccines are safe and effective, but what do we really know? The honest answer is not much and what has emerged does not look good and has been devastating for many.
These injections have contributed to myocarditis, pericarditis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), rampant autoimmune conditions, clotting disorders (thrombocytopenia syndrome), and now frameshifting. Experimentation on the people is the real covid injection story and these frameshifted abnormal proteins set the stage for increases in autoimmune disorders which continue to amass in the scientific literature.
Ann Willis, leading coauthor on the recent research coming out of Cambridge, stated, “As billions of pounds flow into the next set of mRNA treatments, it is essential that these therapeutics are designed to be free from unintended side-effects.” Does this sound safe and effective?
So much for safety, how about effective? Soon after the vaccines rolled out, it became evident that these injections were a failure and did not prevent disease or transmission. As the most vaccinated countries and states skyrocketed in cases, former CDC director, Rochelle Walensky announced this vaccine failure on CNN’s Situation Room on August 5, 2021. In reality, covid injections are unsafe and ineffective and new research continues to demonstrate their actual risks and harms
However, when you are Big Pharma and you have the money for high level marketing campaigns including commercials, celebrities, billboards, intense internet presence, reward giveaways, and coordinated censorship of opposition, anything is possible. Lies can temporarily become truth, nightmares can become reality. This is how propaganda works–all brought to you by Pfizer.
Criminal Covid Injection Recommendations
Criminally, covid vaccine boosters are currently recommended to everyone over 6 months in the United States. This recommendation differs greatly from the majority of other countries that took a cautious approach based on data indicating that the benefit:risk analysis was not justified for certain populations including healthy individuals, pregnant women or children.
Most countries offered recommendations emphasizing covid shots for the immunocompromised, elders and those with multiple comorbidities. Yet when assessing the fast tracked vaccine development, the lack of efficacy and the known and newly identified risks, it is easy to understand why a growing number of medical professionals, attorney generals and surgeon generals are urging regulators to halt these injections. Given the fact that there are a wide variety of peer -reviewed and effective treatment protocols that do not hold the risks associated with the mRNA injections, a halt is the only avenue.
According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Report dated for January 19, 2023, only 11% of children have received the recent covid vaccine, 21.5% for adults and 40.9% for those over 65. Relatively speaking, this is good news, these numbers are much lower than the CDC hoped for, apparently many are getting the unsafe and ineffective message loud and clear.
Lead coauthor and Cambridge toxicologist, Dr. James Thaventhrian stated ,”The safety concern of future mRNA medicines is that misdirected immunity has huge potential to be harmful, so off-target immune response should always be avoided.”
The authors of this frameshifting risk were sure to mention that there were no side effects observed in the mRNA vaccinated patients with an “unintended immune response.” from this abnormal protein production. BBC, NPR and the mainstream media echoed these claims all hoping to quiet the masses and ensure that the successful covid vaccine narrative survives.
However, within the scientific community itself, the reaction is altogether different and the demand for safety evidence, ongoing scrutiny of mRNA injections and a halt to their use continues. An immediate response on the UK frameshifting study provided by Wiseman et al states,
“The findings reveal a developmental and regulatory failure to ask fundamental questions that could affect the safety and effectiveness of these products. …. The finding that unintended proteins may be produced as a result of vaccination is sufficient cause for regulators to conduct full risk assessments of past or future harms that may have ensued….. We await their account of what steps they have taken to investigate why the formation of off-target proteins was not discovered sooner, what toxic effects they may have caused and what steps they are taking to prevent harm in the future and to inform the public of these findings.”
Recently retired head of Pfizer’s vaccine research and development team, Dr. Kathrin Jansen summed it up perfectly when she stated “ We flew the aeroplane while we were still building it.”
And let’s not forget, on top of this nightmare, so many were forced to “take the jab” or risk losing their job, their educational opportunity, and the acceptance of friends and family in many cases. Even access to society with the implementation of vaccine passports for failed, experimental injections was denied in the unvaccinated. Science and law take time to surface truth, we are now witnessing this process and we must do it with our eyes wide open. Sadly this will take decades while many suffer. And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
The author is a clinical nutritionist in St. Johnsbury.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Commentary, Health Care
No worries, disease “x” is coming to eliminate the immune-compromised (AIDS?) so they can achieve the body count and reset the globe according to their plan. The Davos crowd decided the 10 year plan must be completed in 1 year. Good times ahead – best have your house and paperwork in order.
Ah, the dreaded Disease X. Oooooohhh. A few relevant points.
Since Fauxvid was .0003% deadly, that would make Disease X (20x worse! Ooooohhh) what, .006% deadly? Meaning 99.4% will survive. That’s 6 dead out of 1000, and how many of those would have been able to fight off Disease X had their immune systems not been severely compromised by multiple rounds of poison jabs? I’ll take a guess – maybe half of them?
Personally, I don’t know anyone who actually died of Fauxvid. However, I know my sister was killed by myocarditis. I know my wife got a clot in her leg which became a life-threatening pulmonary embolism. Luckily she caught it early. I know a co-worker who also got a clot in his leg. He caught it early as well, before it could do even more damage. And by the way, both of them (and myself) were forced to take the poison jab or lose our jobs. I’ve been the lucky one so far, if you can call not coming down with something that never would have happened sans jab lucky.
And finally, do you really thing these psychopaths trying to kill us all would unleash anything they don’t already have a cure for? They want to depopulate we “deplorables”, not their elite selves. They’re a lot of things, but they’re not stupid.
I thank God everyday for having shown me from the beginning this was never about health or science. I remain uninjected as do my children and many of my friends. I continue to struggle to pray, as we are asked, for the individuals that pushed this toxicity on the innocent. I was called terrible names, threatened, lost many connections and was even divorced for my unwillingness to take part in this satanic experiment. And while I ask our Father to forgive them for they know not what they do, I also pray that these lost souls are held accountable in this life and for eternity.
For what it’s worth, it’s nice to know that I and many others were right abut this topic from the beginning, and I commend everyone who shared similar opinions and who are now being vindicated. Did any of us influence masses of people? I know I didn’t, but I probably got a dozen people to think a little (out of the hundreds I talked to), so I feel I did my small part. I know what all of us “science deniers” went through. I know it’s very difficult to be called crazy, a killer, or that we should be put in a concentration camp. And I especially know how hard it is to take a right when everyone else is stampeding left.
God bless all of us who stuck with our beliefs and actual science.
For me, God put this on my spirit in 2021: Revelation 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
I took a leap into God’s arms and lost my family, my friends, and my career. Since then, I have received peace, wisdom, healing, and clarity. The remnant must stand, testify, and wield the authority that no man can put asunder. We have that power through Jesus Chirst and that is why they want to destroy us and Him. His name is feared and defiled for that very reason. Isaiah 41:10 Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness. Let it be so! Hallelujah!
Excellent essay, and a mere snapshot of everything that could be written about the whole upside-down Covid vaccine enterprise.
I want to hear an apology from Health Commissioner Mark Levine, who stated in May 2021, “And if the virus does come into Vermont, even if it’s a variant, our high vaccination rates create a wall of immunity that stops it from spreading further.” He didn’t say “reduces hospitalizations,” he said IMMUNITY. “Even to variants.”
I want to hear an apology from every Vermont business that closed its doors to anyone who exercised a personal medical decision—especially when it was already known by the time the shots were “approved” that they didn’t stop spread.
I want an apology from the governor for continuing to extend a ridiculous “emergency” order (UVM hospital was never under a surge, and even sent home staff) long after we had “flattened the curve,” which was the whole reason for the shutdowns. It cost me and many others our jobs.
And to think that so many, especially on the Left, remain blissfully unaware or ignorant of the ocean of contradictions, cover-ups, rigged science, and bald propaganda that dictated life in the early 2020s. I even still see the occasional citizen driving with a mask on—alone, of course. Will society ever recover?
It is nice to be a back seat quarterback and look back with the benefit of hindsight about what we should have or could have done. My daughter runs a school in a large public university in England. When the pandemic hit there was no playbook that she could go to decide what she and the school should be doing to manage through the pandemic. She and the university had to make a lot of decision about how to proceed with the little data they had. There were a lot of sleepless nights for her trying to figure out what to do, and a lot of people providing criticism all along the way. So no I do not fault the medical people and political leaders that were making the decisions at the time. Can we learn and do something different next time? I hope we can. BTW, it was President Trump that pushed hard for the Covid19 vaccine and expedited the process to bring it to market quickly. I gladly got my Covid shots and continue to do so. Sometimes we have to consider what is best for the greater good and not what is best for ourselves.
Please explain how the “greater good” factors in when the shots do not stop Covid infection or transmission. And, in fact, may actually increase one’s chances of getting Covid, according to last year’s Cleveland Clinic study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1.full#T2. Off-target immunization is increasingly a concern among medical scientists actually paying attention.
And for those of us paying attention, the top medical people and political decision-makers were not simply making the best decisions they could with the data they had, but were often lying through their teeth. For example, Dr. Deborah Birx of the White House Coronavirus Task Force admitted in an interview in July 2022 that “I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection” even before rollout—a direct contradiction to the voluminous public messaging saying the vaccines would confer immunity. That is one tiny example of too many to count where we were told one thing while government knew otherwise. Thankfully, astute researchers have all the receipts.
Hi , appreciate that there can be different opinions but don’t respond to people that don’t post their names. Don’t know who I am having a discussion with.
Greater good? How? THE INJECTIONS DO NOT PREVENT INFECTION OR TRANSMISSION! 2 of the 3 times i’ve had covid (which was very mild for me) i was contacted by “fully protected” people i had hung out with warning me they had “surprisingly” tested positive. To be clear i would never place blame on them or anyone that passes an illness to me. Immune systems are real. If they don’t get occasionally exercised they grow weak.
Your daughter, and everyone else should have used the common sense that God gave all of us.
The human species has been through the black plague, tuberculosis, famine, and war to mention just a few of the obstacles we have faced. Yet we never before sacrificed the lives of the young to add a few extra months the lives of weak older people.
We did that this time. We destroyed social bonds. We suspended the education of the young and interfered with their ability to socialize in the process. We drove small businesses into bankruptcy.
We did all of this to fight a cold virus. Granted a potential deadly cold virus, but a virus with all the characteristics of a cold. Quick to mutate, impossible to protect against.
Your daughter fell for a propaganda exercise. Many, many people did the same thing. Even worse, many campaigned actively to destroy those who chose to use their common sense.
They should be ashamed.
Best of luck to you! As the advertising slogan goes “better living through chemistry.” If only those who dropped dead could get a do over. It is free will and it should be a choice. For those who wish to live an organic, natural, free from man-made chemicals, GMO free, bio-engineered, lab-grown, g-nome altering substances, have a right to pass and no one should be bothered by that in the coexist, my body-my choice crowd. Can’t serve two masters and can’t have it both ways…the universe simply doesn’t work that way – no matter what Yuval Noah Harari says.
Not sure how it is being a back seat quarterback looking back now when many were questioning this real time. Anyone that dared question ‘the science’ were to be silenced. Just a few weeks ago in closed door testimony Dr. Fauci admitted there was no real science behind the 6 foot rule. We were told ‘it’s a pandemic of the unvaccinated’ when those that are vaccinated still get it, multiple times in some cases. Remember when you could not question the false narrative it didn’t come from the lab? It’s a long list of lies many were smart enough not to believe.
As for being anonymous, there are real life consequences to voicing your opinion if it is not aligned with group think as the open minded crowd is anything but.
“As for being anonymous,….”
Yep. One of the consequences may be in what you think of yourself, and the integrity of your opinions.
If only more of our doctors weren’t so fearful of having their licenses to practice taken away by establishment tyrants like the CDC and FDA, how many people would still be alive today – if they truly ‘followed the science’? Thank goodness for those, like Alison Despathy, who stand by their personal integrity.
I can’t help but think of those who put their lives on the line to protect our freedom. Those who stormed the beaches of Normandy and Guadalcanal. The cops and firefighters who ran into the World Trade Center on 9-11. I think of all of the EMS folks who, to this day, put themselves forward… and not anonymously.
Standing up, personally, for what’s right seems the least I can do. If I’m wrong or make a mistake, you can tell me, and I’ll learn from the experience. But when you’re unwilling to stand up personally for what you believe is right, what do you think that says to the rest of us? Or, perhaps, you really don’t care what anyone else thinks.
How come it’s only “we” when “they” don’t want to face accountability? Your daughter is paid to be in charge. She and her colleagues, should be held accountable for poor leadership, and she should no longer hold her position. You should be embarrassed on behalf of your daughter instead of using her as a prop to defend your own poor decision making. Sometimes WE should consider the greater good, now would be a great time, in hindsight, YOU and your daughter were WRONG. What is best for society is that our errant leaders take responsibility and correct their mistakes. I’m sick of the limp wristed and passive aggressive shame/fear/denial tactics of an increasing aged and ineffectual status quo.
some times you can make a fool of your selves and later come back and prove it/// warp speed warped mind warped body///
BRAVO, again, Alison, for your truth-telling and educating! And BRAVO VDC for allowing this truth to be told! A rare commodity these days in news reporting!
MEMO
RE: EUA Countermeasures to send to your doctor, pharmacist, employer, school, sheriff, county commissioner and state lawmakers
SOURCE:
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/memo-re-eua-countermeasures-to-send
Purpose: Clarify the legal status of EUA Medical Countermeasures (MCMs)
Pursuant to Section 564 of the FD&C Act, as amended by PAHPRA, 2013, and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2), EUA MCMs have potentially been exempted from testing using Good Laboratory Practices, Good Clinical Practice, including informed consent, and from being assessed to determine if Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) are necessary.
Safety regulations governing the manufacture, shipment, holding, dispensing, administration and labeling do not necessarily apply to MCMs, rather, they are subject to an opinion by FDA and HHS officials without proper Congressional or judicial review for the duration of HHS-declared emergency. The declaration of emergency is likewise without properly defined stopping criteria, nor Congressional or judicial review.
Under federal law, FDA must approve any new drug product prior to a manufacturer introducing it into interstate commerce.[1]
This process requires manufacturer to open an Investigational New Drug application and obtain an exemption from the FDA for its use in regulated investigational clinical research (trials). This normal regulated process is therefore referred to as an “investigational” regulatory pathway. It requires a manufacturer to conduct regulated clinical research (trials) under the IND, obtaining Institutional Review Board’s (IRB) approval for clinical trial protocols, independent safety monitoring oversight, and properly executed informed consent from clinical trial volunteers. In addition, manufacture of the drugs and biologics subject to the investigational status is regulated by the current Good Manufacturing practices (cGMP)[2]
EUA Medical Countermeasures are a radically different, defined in law as non-investigational drugs, biologics and devices deployed under FDA’s authorization power known as the “Emergency Use Authorization” (EUA) process[3].
The EUA process is used only when the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services declares an emergency[4].
By law, the EUA process is non-investigational[5]: while the manufacturers may choose and FDA may ask to undertake some of the activities typically expected from an investigational clinical trial and manufacturing validation process, none of the typical regulatory standards are applicable in an enforceable way.
FDA has the discretion to issue an EUA if the applicant shows that its product “may be effective” in treating the relevant disease or condition[6].
It is important to emphasize the no other criteria for approval apply in an enforceable way.
FDA will approve EUA products on incomplete information so long as the applicant shows that the “known and potential benefit of the product” merely “outweigh[s] the known and potential risks”[7] and considers it unlikely that “comprehensive effectiveness data” will be available before an EUA grant. In contrast, for an investigational drug (under normal regulatory approval process) the FDA “shall” deny approval if the applicant “do[es] not show that such drug is safe.”[8]
Therefore, the EUA status of an MCM precludes collection of the investigational (subject to IRB and informed consent) clinical trial data and thus precludes reliable, valid scientific knowledge of risks and benefits associated with the EUA Countermeasure.
The EUA process precludes meaningful informed consent from the recipients of the product: while Congress mandated that FDA directly inform health care professionals and product recipients of any “significant known and potential benefits and risks,”[9] formal regulated clinical trials are neither required nor possible for a non-investigational EUA product. Thus, there is no reliable and scientifically valid information on risks and benefits of an EUA, especially for extremely novel technologies such as mRNA shots.
Furthermore, there are no required standards for quality-control in manufacturing; no inspections of manufacturing procedures; no lot-release testing and no prohibition on wide variability among lots; no prohibition on adulteration; and no required compliance with Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP). EUA products, even though unregulated and non-standardized, “shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded.”[10]
In summary, the process through which the EUA products enter interstate commerce and claims about their safety, efficacy or contents are based solely on the HHS Secretary opinion, which requires no supporting scientific evidence. Misrepresentation of safety, efficacy or contents of EUA products is allowed by federal law. Thus, claims provided by the federal health authorities or manufacturers cannot be considered reliable sources of information.
References:
References Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities, Guidance for Industry and Other Stakeholders, January 2017 Procedural OMB Control No. 0910- 0595 Expiration Date 09/30/202, Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities | FDA or direct link at http://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download , particularly pages 15, 22-25, 27,28, 33, and 39-41. Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies, https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/fdas-application- statutory-factors- determining-when-rems-necessary; direct link at https://www.fda.gov/media/100307/download . Power point briefings on Section 564 of the FD&C Act, https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-andpolicy-framework/mcm-related-legal-and-policy-presentations-publications-and-qas : 1) August 25th-27, 2020 FDA – CDC Joint Learning Session, Regulatory Updates on Use of Medical Countermeasures Preparedness Summit ; 2) February 10, 2021 PHEP Connects Webinar; 3) March 1, 2021, The American Bar Association Health Law Section; Overview of FDAs EUA Authority and COVID-19 Response; 4) March 18, 2021, The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Public Health Law Webinar; 5) April 21, 2021, Overview from FDA: 2021 Preparedness Summit; 6) May 15, 2021 PMDA (The Pennsylvania Society for Post- Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine), Spring Symposium; and 7) November 21, 2021, FDA’s EUA Authorities, BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority) Industry Day. Direct links at 1) 2022-09-15 08:43 | Archive of FDA (pagefreezer.com) 2) 202111_CDC PHEP Connect Webinar.pdf 3) 202103_ABA Health Law Section.EUA_.Overview.FDA_.3.1.21.pdf 4) 202103_CSTE_FDA_3_18_21.final__0.pdf 5) Ross Overview_2021_Preparedness_Summit_508KH.pdf 6) J_Ross_20210515_FDAsEUAs_Other_Related_Authorities_508_KH.pdf 7) 202111_FDAs_Emergency_Use_Authorities.pdf
Key Enabling Statutes:
Six primary enabling statutes include:
Title 21 – Federal Food and Drugs Act, at §360bbb et seq, “Expanded access to unapproved therapies and diagnostics,” as established in 1997;
Title 42 – Public Health Service Act, at §247d et seq, “Public health emergencies,” as established in 1983;
Title 42 – Public Health Service Act, at §300hh et seq, “National All-Hazards Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies,” as established in 2002;
Title 42 – Public Health Service Act, at §300aa-1 et seq, “Vaccines,” as established in 1986;
Title 10 – Armed Forces Act, at §4021 et seq, “Research projects: transactions other than contracts and grants,” as established for DoD use for “prototype” contracting in 2015;
Title 50, Chapter 32, §1511 et seq, “Chemical and Biological Warfare,” as established in 1969.
[1] See, e.g., 21 U.S.C. § 355 (drugs); 42 U.S.C. § 262 (biologics).
[2] CFR Title 21, including sections in parts 1-99, 200-299, 300-499, 600-799, and 800-1299.
[3] Section 564 FD&C Act. Note that the EUA pathway should not be confused with the “Expanded Access Use” regulatory pathway which is often colloquially referred to as an “emergency use”. The expanded access is an investigational pathway and is regulated in the same manner as all normal drug approvals. (21 CFR 312.310-320)
[4] 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(a)(1), (b).
[5] 21 USC 360bbb-3(k): If a product is the subject of an authorization under this section, the use of such product within the scope of the authorization shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation for purposes of section 355(i), 360b(j), or 360j(g) of this title or any other provision of this chapter or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262].
[6] 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(c)(2)(A)
[7] 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb3(c)(2)(B)
[8] 21 U.S.C. § 355(d)(2); See also 42 U.S.C. § 262(a)(2)(RB) (biologic approved only if it actually “is . . . safe”).
[9] 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(II)
[10] 21 USC 360bbb-3a(c).
Memo Re EUA Countermeasures to send to your doctor, pharmacist, employer, school, sheriff, county commissioner and state lawmakers
SOURCE:
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/memo-re-eua-countermeasures-to-send
this was all known three years ago/// many people dead///
Built on the lie:
That viruses exist (See Antoine Bauchamp + Louis Pasteur); that germs (the ‘idea’ that becomes a seed that grows into a plant) are bad and dangerous; and that vaccines fix anything…
Knowledge breeds discernment and enlightenment brings wisdom.
NEVER turn away from knowledge or you WILL be coerced, bamboozled, and sold into slavery…debt slavery through health…
Crickets?
Only a fool would take these unproven vaccines and boosters just because the FDA and CDC tells them to do so.
And only a tyrant would foist these same vaccines and boosters on children who have a virtually zero chance of being killed, or even being hospitalized, by the virus.