by Allison Despathy
This past week on June 17, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for both the Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines for children as young as 6 months of age.
This is literally experimentation on our children.
This is an experimental, gene-based injection completely lacking any level of rigorous data related to safety, efficacy or long-term complications. Children are not suffering from severe covid. Children have close to a 100% recovery rate from Covid. The only children struggling are those who are immuno-compromised due to health conditions or medication and unfortunately these children would struggle with any infection.
Public health experts at Johns Hopkins University such as Marty Makary have been discussing this fact for over a year now. Why would this experimental vaccination campaign in children even be considered at this point with what has been a clearly evident Covid vaccine failure in the adult population? We went from 100% safe and effective to -you can get and transmit Covid but it prevents severe Covid. Again I ask how would this reduction in severity even be assessed- Plain and simple it has not.
Typically vaccines take on average about ten years to come to market after safety trials and long term research regarding efficacy and possible complications. These experimental, gene-based Covid injections have zero long-term assessments regarding safety, especially since clinical trials were unblinded and then it becomes impossible to track long term effects. These vaccines are combining biotechnology, synthetic biology and nanotechnology, all newer scientific technologies with massive gaps in understanding relating to actual impacts on human health.
Why would we take this risk with our children when it is clearly evident that children are NOT struggling with severe Covid? How is this even possible that the FDA would allow this when there is absolutely zero evidence suggesting a need for an experimental, gene-based injection for our children?
This is a huge risk with absolutely no known or recognizable benefit. These experimental injections do not prevent Covid or transmission of Covid so vaccinating a child is not going to save a family member who is at-risk or immuno-compromised. There is no logic or scientific basis here.
Further, as of June 10, there are currently 1,301,354 adverse reactions to Covid vaccines that have been reported to the Health and Human Services Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). There have been 28,859 reported deaths. These numbers are astounding and warrant pause and adequate scrutiny and assessment to determine what is actually happening here especially before unleashing this new experimental technology on our children. The swine flu vaccine campaign of 1976 was halted and reevaluated after much lower numbers of adverse events, specifically Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) had been reported.
Natural immunity has always been considered the gold standard and at this point all of the scientific evidence in the research is supporting the fact that having Covid regardless of vaccination status is the best protection and far surpasses any level of immunity offered by a vaccine alone. A high majority of children have had Covid and thus have natural immunity- estimates based on data range between 40 to greater than 80% of the children at this point who have had Covid. Natural immunity is yet again showing the most robust, durable protection compared to the experimental Covid injections which also bring both known and unknown risks.
Coronaviruses are common cold viruses that have been with us for as long as we know. People are infected with coronaviruses regularly and often every year- sometimes they struggle symptomatically and sometimes they do not, there are many factors involved here. Coronaviruses true role in the body are not fully understood. There are virologists around the world who are researching and attempting to understand the role of a virus as well as the virome. Some viruses seem to offer protection from other diseases, infections and environmental exposures.
Skip Virgin, a world renowned virologist conducts research in this realm. There is so much we do not understand about viruses and their role in life and health but we do know that coronaviruses naturally mutate, people have always encountered them through life and they are typically not a problem for people. We are not going to eradicate coronaviruses, we need to acknowledge how little we know about viruses, the role they play and also the fact that all coronavirus vaccines in the past have failed. An emphasis on healthy lifestyle practices, nutrition status, and immune system support are real solutions for public health that do not have side effects or long term complications.
In 2017, NPR published an article entitled, “One-Third of New Drugs Had Safety Problems After FDA Approval.” In this article, author Sydney Lupkin states that “A Yale School of Medicine study found that nearly one third of medication approved by the FDA between the years of 2001-2010 had major safety issues after the medications were made widely available to the patients. Seventy-one of the 222 drugs approved in the first decade of the millennium were withdrawn, required a“black box” warning on side effects or warranted a safety announcement about new risks,,,,.” This was reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
Dr. Caleb Alexander, Co-Director of the John Hopkins Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, stated, “All too often, patients and clinicians mistakenly view FDA approval as (an) indication that a product is fully safe and effective, nothing could be further from the truth.” Not only are we dealing with rushed vaccine development, research and trials as well as completely new vaccine technology but now we have a rushed FDA authorization of an EUA- which is an experimental product NOT an FDA approved product.
It is also worth noting that Donald W. Light, writing for the Center for Ethics at Harvard University found that new prescription drugs have a 1 in 5 chance of causing serious reactions after they have been approved. He stated, “That is why expert physicians recommend not taking new drugs for at least five years unless patients have first tried better-established options and have the need to do so.”
People have a legitimate right and duty to question the safety of these new injections and the recent, rushed FDA Emergency Use Authorization for experimental gene-based injections in children over the age of 6 months. It is also essential to note that the FDA authorized Covid ‘vaccines’ still hold a full liability shield for both Pfizer and Moderna due to the protection offered by the still active declaration of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) and its medical countermeasures clause. This is unacceptable-These are our children.
Are these Covid “vaccines” really a safe or necessary option for our children? Is this really going to provide any actual benefit that outweighs both the known and unknown risks? Keep in mind there is zero evidence supporting actual benefit with these Covid injections and the risks are unfortunately prevalent and real. These are the most critical questions at this time. These are our children.
One-Third Of New Drugs Had Safety Problems After Approval : Shots – Health News : NPR
COVID Vaccine Data (openvaers.com)
The Flimsy Evidence Behind the CDC’s Push to Vaccinate Children – WSJ
The author is a clinical nutritionist in St. Johnsbury.