Commentary on Vermont Daily Chronicle’s comprehensive coverage of S.236.
by Alison Despathy
How dare you engage as stewards of your local communities and environments? It is unimaginable that you would care enough to keep an eye on proposed industrial developments in your local spaces and intervene when necessary. How could you?
This ‘NIMBYs are bad’ perspective was brutally shared by Joslyn Wilschek in the Senate Finance committee on Wednesday, January 24. Joslyn is a member of Renewable Energy Vermont (REV) and as a lawyer with the WILO Law Office, her firm helps industry, the solar industry in particular, navigate the Public Utilities Commission process to ensure their projects move forward..
Together, Wilschek and Senator Anne Watson wrote S.236, a bill which greatly favors the renewable energy industry and would severely limit Vermonters’ ability to take a fully engaged role in proposed energy projects that come to our communities. S.236 proposes to limit a neighbor’s engagement solely to traffic, public health and safety issues versus a broad scope of concerns that may arise in each unique proposal.
In her testimony, Wilschek stated “Nimbyism blocks, slows down and makes way more expensive the transition to the affordable electric grid that we need.” She also used the words classist, racist, and privileged in her testimony as she described how and why Vermonters are voicing their concerns.
I have come to detest the word NIMBY. This is derogatory and places concerned citizens and neighbors into a category of illegitimate and elitist interrupters versus invested neighbors with warranted concerns and insight that deserve attention.
Vermonters are the stewards of their land, environment and local resources. We have both a right and duty as local residents to ensure that proposed projects are beneficial, meaningful, low impact and that communities and environments are not taken advantage of by an industry out for profit.
Make no mistake, renewable energy is an industry and this must be acknowledged. REV is their representation and action arm at the statehouse. Regardless of how one feels about the role that the renewable energy industry should play in VT, there is an unprecedented abundance of money to be made with the Inflation Reduction Act subsidies heading this way. Many are chomping at the bit to get in on the game.
Renewable Energy Vermont (REV) is full force steamrolling S.236 to clear the path of obstacles including Vermonters who responsibly and legitimately question the environmental, economic or long term impacts of proposed renewable energy projects popping up in our communities.
A close look at Renewable Energy Vermont reveals that both their board and members ARE the renewable energy industry. Ranging from solar installers, electric companies, solar engineers, transportable power systems and battery services, lawyers, and investors, like VPIRG, REV works to promote the industry and increase avenues and profits for their renewable energy industry stakeholders.
By restricting a neighbor’s ability to engage, REV lobbyists are doing exactly what their board and members expect; ensuring that their products and services are prioritized at all costs. This is REV’s job and S.236 helps them to seal the deal and stifle necessary public engagement. It is paramount that legislators recognize this situation and work to ensure that the rights of Vermonters to steward and help guide special interest projects in their communities are upheld and protected.
The ability of neighbors and community members to hold a place at the table while proposed projects are assessed is critical to the responsible and meaningful siting of renewable energy projects. S.236 is the ultimate industry bill, a dream come true for developers and those in the renewable energy industry who would love to eliminate roadblocks such as Vermonters.
Vermont looks the way it does due to the engagement of residents who care about the environment, natural resources and scenic beauty of Vermont. This scenic beauty is Vermont’s true wealth. It signifies healthy, intact ecosystems, biodiversity and a love of nature–all of which are integral to the health of the state and Vermonters. Vermonters are bound together by a deep respect and appreciation for the environment and our desire to protect and steward our natural resources and wild spaces.
Not only does this natural scenic beauty feed our soul and recharge our spirit, it also drives tourism and is a fundamental component of our economy. Vermont towns and the state as a whole thrive due to a healthy tourist industry, which grows every year as many seek to escape to this natural beauty and all that Vermont has to offer.
As reported by the Agency of Commerce and Community Development, ACCD Vermont: “Tourism in Vermont is a $3 billion industry that supports over 30,000 jobs (Over 10% of Vermont’s workforce)”
Last year at the Tourism Day at the Statehouse, the Vermont Chamber of Commerce shared that as the second largest economic contributor in the state, Vermont’s visitor economy brought 13 million annual visitors and an influx of 3.2 billion dollars with a 387.3 Million annual tax revenue.
Senator Watson and White should be ashamed of themselves for allowing S.236 to come forward. Maybe when you have been granted the Vermont Conservation Rising Star Award, the pressure is on to favor the renewable energy industry at all costs? Choosing special interest over Vermonters and our environments is the fundamental trend here. The Unaffordable Heat Act, now Act 18, fell in the same destructive category and yet again the same Senators are involved. Who do they really represent?
With any level of research, these Senators would have found that not only does this bill disrespect Vermonters, it is also unnecessary and detrimental. On February 6, during her testimony to Senate Finance, Annette Smith discussed this fact and shared the data to support this reality. VDC reached out for a summary of her testimony. Smith shared that the PUC data,
“Clearly identifies the fact that there is no justification or need for this bill. Neighbors, towns and regional planning commissions rarely comment, intervene, or participate in Public Utilities Commission (PUC) proceedings. In the few cases where the public engages in PUC cases, the process is intense, onerous and the developer’s attorneys are hostile to public participation. Nevertheless, public intervenors present valuable facts and information that are necessary for the PUC to make good decisions.”
Renewable Energy Vermont and industry lawyers like Wilschek are determined to create a path free from disruption for their renewable energy projects, including removing us “NIMBY” Vermonters.
Hopefully the Senators will see through Watson, White, VPIRG’s and REV’s special interest charade and acknowledge and respect the role Vermonters play in ensuring that our communities, local environments and natural resources are protected and have a voice in proposed development. As stewards, we must scrutinize and guide projects in our space, it is our responsibility.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Commentary, Energy, Environment, State Government
Words are used to gaslight opponents…whether they are domestic partners (GASLIGHT, the movie), or political opponents, or anyone we don’t have a valid argument to refute them with…its a tool of intimidation.
GASLIGHTING is the issue, not the words.
NIMBYs exist, and not in just one form… they are similar to the Karen’s of the plandemic… ready to say, you must live the way I do or you are not acceptable to me.
In Vermont, this was an obvious growth that started back in teh 50s when city folk saw Vermont as their personal playground, and brought with them their Westchester/Conn/Boston urban holier than thou you so and so Vermontahs who …don’t interfere in each others lives except to lend a hand.
This is a corruption of our values by those whose eyes are set on imaginary, fictitious, and artificial values of an earthly realm that God allows, but keeps hoping we’ll say no to.
Words are weaponized now.
Calling it out is fine…but its not the words themselves.
Its the intent behind their use, and their timing.
Remember this: I’m rubber and you’re glue, your words bounce off me and stick to you. They say “nimby” – we say “flatlander” or “carpetbagger”. Some call it gaslighting – I call it mudslinging. It is an artform developed in school yards and mastered on job sites, cubicle zoos, internet chat rooms, comment sections, or political press conferences. What must be comprehended is these tactics are effective on those who don’t know the reason behind it. The psyop within the psyop to control and manipulate the masses. Divide and conquer – the Masters have given the marching orders. It is up to the People to raise the standard and take the enemy down to the ground. The pen (keyboard) is mighter than the sword – Truth prevails. The more panic on their side the better. Their insults are showing little impact as they are clearly losing the war at this point. Declared and decreed.
Fully agree Sword of truth. Exactly right. The word NIMBY is currently weaponized to denigrate, silence and shame anyone who dare engage in the projects that come to their communities and will directly impact the space they live in. Don’t ask questions, we don’t want your input is the clear message.
This is highly dangerous to Vermonters, our communities and the environment. Energy developers do not care for a community or environment the way that invested residents do.
Thank you for pointing out this reality and the power words hold.
IF we did NIMBY for drug dealers,
** rat them out,
** take them to court over zoning violations of operating a pharmacy without a license,
** fining them daily until they stopped,
** protest outside their homes with signs,
** wrote letters to the editor about specific drug dealers,
** had cops enforce the laws like where a man was doing target practice on his property with friends,
and last but not least put the whole power of the state to drive them out, like they closed the gym owner during covid…..
Well, Vermont would be free of drugs in 3 months!
By their fruit you shall know them….they love doing the drugs, promoting, Jesus not so much.
President Bukele takes a victory lap after El Salvador becomes the safest nation in the Western hemisphere. The rights of criminals supersede the rights of honest citizens.
Well written and well said Alison Despathy! Thank you.
We Vermonters take the stewardship of the land very seriously whether our little plot is the size of a postage stamp or hundreds of acres. It is ours to oversee and care for during our lifetime and hopefully pass it on to another person who will do the same. It is our duty to prevent exploitation for profit.
see these solar panels could never have been allowed in any community, they had to completely bypass all local and state zoning.
See how quickly things can happen? Solar panels everywhere. (paid for by the taxpayer btw with tax rebates)
See how quickly Vermont was able to rebuild after Irene, here again, they dropped all regulations to get work done. Is Vermont in peril after all this work? Hardly….
See this is also how quickly Vermont could solve it’s housing problem and affordability problem…..if we only had leadership that was concerned about the people of Vermont over their Build Back Better friends in Davos….WHO, Agenda 2030.
We could solve our drug problems this quick too.
We could solve our homeless problems this quick too.
We could solve our crime problems this quick too.
We need to change our direction, the current plan only works for the grifters.
STOP GRIFTING VERMONT!!!!!
One of the main traditions of Vermont and New England is local and town control, right? That’s democracy – the people decide how they want to live their lives. Don’t let them bully you into worsening your life for others’ profit.
That’s the problem, we aren’t a democracy. You are supposed to be able to control the ownership of my property by VOTE!!!
We are supposed to have LAWS that protect the individual.
This very basic understanding is missing, on purpose and via indoctrination and propaganda.
No, you are not supposed to be able to vote all my rights of property ownership out the window! Yet this is common practice and understanding across our state. We’ll protest and complain, with a stamp and an attorney we’ll stop anything you want to do that bothers me.
See how that doesn’t really work?
If you can make enough laws by vote, you can legally prevent anyone from doing anything on their property through administrative laws, fees and a quagmire of rules. Essentially committing a government takeover of your property without compensation, something the constitution doesn’t allow.
Typical liberal way of operating. Put a piece of gray tape over the public’s mouth and then claim “Well, nobody spoke up!”. Call it what it is – censorship.
Words DO have power. We really NEED to learn this. Words and intentions shape and create reality. Proof? Any church. Anyone who says a rosary every day.
So rip off that gray tape and voice your concerns. Thank you for speaking up, Ms Despathy.
Thanks for writing this Alison, I could not agree more. When an entire town recently ‘ripped the grey tape off’ to make its voice heard, it was subjected to the State’s indignant onslaught of condescendingly dismissive rhetoric and an acrimonious strong-armed assault, attacking some residents personally and the town collectively. When did expressing a legitimate concern about a proposal you see problems with become so toxic? So now our State leadership, executive and legislative, believe a community should just roll over and accept anything, proposed by anyone, wherever they want to put it? And if a community has the audacity to object, they have their minions unleash a vitriolic nimby assault. Of course ‘the establishment’ knows whats best for us, right?