Commentary

Dame: Four Democrats choose activism over responsibility

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

by Paul Dame

Recently, a few extreme Progressives in Vermont have demonstrated why Democrats across the country are losing favor with the American people. In just the last two weeks, at least four elected Democrats have put activism ahead of their responsibility to serve their constituents. One Democrat might be an outlier, two could be a coincidence, but four elected Democrats shirking their duties demonstrates an alarming pattern. Every voter in Vermont should be questioning whether their local Democrat is committed to serving their district or simply advancing a personal ideological agenda.

Rep. Mari Cordes

Vermonters expect their legislators to listen to all sides and make the best policy decisions within our means—without playing favorites. This expectation was violated when two Addison County Democrats in the House, Rep. Mari Cordes and Rep. Jubilee McGill, were caught publicly coordinating a disruptive counter-protest that described itself as “rebellious” and a “takeover.” A group had reserved space in the State House to present information based on personal experiences from other states. Ideally, every Vermonter wants their legislator to listen to all sides of an issue because even minority perspectives can help improve legislation. But when deep disagreements arise, voters at the very least expect their legislators to be respectful. Instead, Rep. Cordes and Rep. McGill used social media to help coordinate an intentionally disruptive scene that gained national attention as it descended into a raucous shouting match. Passionate debate is expected, but lawmakers should rise above the fray—not stoke division and chaos.

Rep. Kate Logan

Vermonters expect their legislators to conduct themselves ethically and obey the law. This expectation was violated when Progressive/Democrat Rep. Kate Logan of Burlington abandoned her duties as a state legislator to travel to Washington, D.C., while the Vermont House was in session. She joined a protest for a federal issue, disregarded police warnings, and was arrested for “unlawful demonstration.” Beyond violating the law in D.C., she likely violated House Rule 10, which requires legislators to be present in Montpelier “unless sick or otherwise necessarily detained.” While she was off engaging in activism, Republicans in Montpelier were working on public safety legislation, and Logan missed a critical roll call vote on a bill affecting criminal accountability in Vermont.

Sen. Tanya Vyhovsky

Vermonters expect their legislators to prioritize issues affecting us here at home—where they have actual influence. But this week, Sen. Tanya Vyhovsky jetted off to London to give a speech about Ukraine. Even in a Facebook reel promoting her visit, she prioritized her activist credentials over her legislative work. And it’s not just words—her actions prove where her focus lies. While Vermonters wait for action on the future of the Global Warming Solutions Act and the Clean Heat Standard, that work is stalled in the Senate until Sen. Vyhovsky returns from her activism abroad. Vermonters appreciate legislators who are passionate about causes, but it’s another thing entirely to leave the chamber during crossover—one of the most critical legislative periods of the year—to engage in geopolitical activism that is beyond her scope as a Vermont senator. While she likely won’t submit per diem or travel expenses for her trip, Vermont taxpayers are still footing the bill for her weekly salary while she ignores the pressing issues affecting Vermonters.

Rep. Jubilee McGill

It’s becoming clearer every day: Democrats in Vermont are big—very big—on making statements and putting on a show. But what they have been very light on this year is actually solving problems. Last week, Republicans held a press conference highlighting all the bills we have in committee that are being ignored—bills that address the issues voters sent us to Montpelier to tackle. Meanwhile, Democrats seem determined to maintain the status quo. They travel the country and the world speaking about problems they have no control over while doing nothing about the problems they could solve right here in Vermont.

The solutions are not complicated. To get more people housed, we need to build more homes, which means cutting red tape to make the process predictable. To improve public safety, we need better enforcement and must prevent criminals from operating with virtual immunity. To fix education spending, we need to cut duplicative administrative and local spending with local taxes.

The reason Democrats have made virtually no progress on these issues is simple: many are not in the legislature to solve problems. They are there to elevate their activist profiles, secure more media attention, and earn invitations to international conferences. Their ideological framework prevents them from accepting that their policies are failing—or perhaps, making problems worse. In states like California and New York, entrenched incumbents have refused to face reality. But Vermonters are more practical and pragmatic.

The Vermont Republican Party is quickly becoming the best option for common-sense centrists who are tired of empty talk and performative politics. Vermonters deserve lawmakers who focus on basic, good governance—right here at home, where we can take care of ourselves first. And Vermont Republicans, led by Governor Phil Scott, are ready to answer that call and do the work.

The author is an Essex Junction resident and chair of the Vermont Republican Party.


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Commentary

7 replies »

  1. The big question that remains unanswered: Who is going to hold any legislator or official to account for 1) violating the rules 2) violating inalienable civil rights laws 3) ethics violations 4) misappropriating taxpayer or campaign money 5) collusion, coercion, and conspiracy to commit fraud?

    It is one thing to finger wag – which all are very astute at, I must say. When is there going to be consequences? Anyone? I’ll wait. I’ve been waiting for a very long, long time for somebody to do something right, ethical, principled and law abiding when it comes to the Capitol Complex-ity and the Golden Thunderdome.

  2. Disgusting, all I can say is REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER When they are up for reelection! Ethics violations? Dereliction of duty? What else!!

  3. Paul, if you can’t beat these clowns, who are parodies of themselves, at every level, then it’s time to look in the mirror. Your “common sense centrists” can’t carry the day. And maybe your “practical and pragmatic” electorate of VT is a hazy, pre I-91 dream.

    And maybe, just maybe, a LOT of Republicans and Independents (like me) you need to get off the couch still burn hot about Dear Leader Scott’s covid tyranny and will never, ever lift a finger or check a box to support their oppressor(s).

    But thanks for the strongly-worded letter. With “legislators who focus on basic, good governance—right here at home, where we can take care of ourselves first,” you gosh-darn nearly said, by logical extension, “America first!”

  4. Another public statement/letter on a site the conservatives read, chum for the old guard, suggesting that somebody is doing something, when in fact the leadership above will not come out publicly and say what needs to be said. Smoke and mirrors. Aiding and abetting the marxists. VTGOP supports Build Back Better and you will own nothing and be happy, prove me wrong.

  5. These so-called activists are not Democrats or Progressives as they like to call themselves. They are Marxists that have taken over one political party, the Democrat Party, to destroy our representative constitutional republic. They are voted in by people who fall for their rhetoric and are too lazy to read and understand our rights under the Constitution. Meanwhile it was people like Paul Dame and Governor Scott who enabled them by opposing the America First agenda of President Trump. Now Dame is criticizing the monsters he and Scott helped to create by trying meet these people in the middle of issues where there is only one side to take.

    “There are two sides to every issue: one side is right, and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil. The man who is wrong still retains some respect for truth, if only by accepting the responsibility of choice. But the man in the middle is the knave who blanks out the truth in order to pretend that no choice or values exist, who is willing to sit out the course of any battle, willing to cash in on the blood of the innocent or to crawl on his belly to the guilty, who dispenses justice by condemning both the robber and the robbed to jail, who solves conflicts by ordering the thinker and the fool to meet each other halfway. In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit. In that transfusion of blood which drains the good to feed the evil, the compromise is the transmitting rubber tube.” – AYN RAND

  6. Vyhovsky should be ousted. Why should we pay for her activism. What a blinking joke. 😡