|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
H.541 would create new penalties as clerks report disruptions during elections

By Mona Abou, for the Community News Service
Lincoln town clerk Sally Ober opened up her email days before the 2016 election. She found what she described as a disturbing email that included a seven-page manifesto informing her that there was a CIA terrorist cult in Vermont and that people were going to die if she didn’t pay attention. Ober wasn’t sure whether to ignore it or report it.
Ober, who has served as an election official for almost 20 years, said she has come to expect these kinds of messages ahead of federal elections ever since 6. She said the problem is not just the threats themselves, but the way they interfere with running an election.
“All of these incidents are distracting from doing the work that we clerks need to do to be well prepared for running free and fair elections,” she told the House Committee on Judiciary on Jan. 15.
Ober’s testimony was in support of H.541, a bill that would create a new section of Vermont law, prohibiting interference with voters and election officials.
As passed by the House, the bill would make it illegal to intimidate, threaten or coerce a person in an attempt to interfere with their right to vote; pressure a person to vote a certain way; or obstruct the administration of an election. If violated, the offender could be fined up to $2,000, spend up to two years in prison, or both.
The bill also keeps an existing law in place that can fine offenders $1,000 for similar actions, such as exposing someone’s ballot or attempting to influence their vote.
Rep. Ian Goodnow, D-Windham-9, the bill’s main sponsor, said H.541 came after conversations with Secretary of State Sarah Copeland Hanzas and his own experiences helping run elections as a justice of the peace.
“Over the years, I have seen the tension at the polls and some of the rhetoric around elections has really changed,” he said in an interview with Community News Service.
Goodnow said the shift put local election officials on the front lines, as they are often the ones interacting directly with voters. He had people from his community, like Brattleboro town clerk Hilary Francis, in mind when working on the bill.
“Anything we could do to create any kind of protections for people like Hilary who are working so hard for Vermonters, and they do it every year,” he said. “It’s a thankless task.”
Goodnow said the current political climate, and concerns about the integrity of democratic institutions, factored into his decision to sponsor the bill.
“Legislation like this can at least provide a little bit of a bulwark against some of those concerns,” he said. “Is it like the silver bullet? No. But it’s another tool in the toolbox for prosecutors to be able to take action against people who could potentially try to attack the integrity of an election process.”
Rep. Kate Nugent, D-Chittenden-10, the bill’s other sponsor, said H.541 is meant to extend protections already in place at the federal level to state and local elections.
Nugent, who also worked on elections as a justice of the peace in South Burlington, said that experience motivated her to sponsor the bill.
“I think it’s the most fundamental part of our government,” she said in an interview with Community News Service.
Even with the bill aligning with federal law, Goodnow said there was some debate around First Amendment rights.
“There’s a real concern to overstep, to create a chilling effect on the election process by creating a law that’s unconstitutional,” he said.
The House bill, which passed on Feb. 4, has been compared to Senate bill S.298, which would expand voters’ protections and accessibility. Lawmakers are still discussing how the two proposed bills might fit together, and will continue to discuss before taking further action.
Via Community News Service, a University of Vermont journalism internship
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Elections, Legislation








How about we repel the law that let’s illegals vote in our elections? Anyone else?
Candidates always try to influence people’s votes. Is that going to be against the law under H.541 or will it just be against the law for conservatives to express their opinion when some snowflake files a complaint that someone with whom they disagree “tries to influence their vote”? I see potential 1st amendment right abuses, for sure.
RE: if there is such concern about some “…attempt to influence their vote,”…. ” …create a chilling effect on the election process,” or … election integrity,” shall we ask the Governor to refrain announcing in public which Presidential candidate he voted for (Biden), or whether he voted for or against his recent school board budget?
Threats to Town Clerks and poll workers increase so the legislature bans concealed carry at the polls. As a BCA member who has worked at the polls for over 25 years, I feel much safer now because we know that this ban will most certainly keep armed criminals, terrorists and other miscreants out of the polling area.
Agreed, statutory laws are always 100% effective at making people behave themselves. There are almost no cases where people violate State statutes, because they fear the serious consequences of Vermont’s vindictive court system…
The bizarre threats and warnings directed toward this town clerk are no more outlandish and unnerving than your typical messages delivered to the public during a no kings rally or any tirade delivered by someone suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome. If this law were to pass, would this stop unsubstantiated claims that Trump or Hillary stole an election? Would it be used against those who accuse sworn law enforcement officers of being genocidal fascists and nazis? Sounds like a proposal that is tailored for selective prosecution in a moonbat-infested Vermont State’s Attorney’s office or courtroom.
Rep. Kate Nugent, D-Chittenden-10, the bill’s other sponsor, said H.541 is meant to extend protections already in place at the federal level to state and local elections. Who else is tired of the duplicity in Vermont bills, Rep Nugent said it herself, the plandemic and all the draconian measures that our beloved legislators felt were necessary, ie mailing out ballots to everyone., including the deceased, and previous tenants of a domicile resulted in over 100,000 extra ballots being sent out and most likely returned and counted, just follow the SAVE act to save fair elections, PERIOD!