Legislation

A single-digit vs. double-digit property tax increase should be a simple choice

Montpelier, VT—The Vermont Senate and House Republican caucuses issued the following joint statement:

“13.8 percent–that’s how much, on average, Vermonters can expect their  property tax bills to rise if Governor Scott’s veto of the yield bill is overturned,” said Senate Minority Leader Randy Brock (R-Franklin). “That increase is entirely unacceptable. Our Democrat colleagues have the choice at their disposal to work with us to avoid a double-digit property tax hike. But instead of continuing to work on meaningful solutions to do all we can to lower rates and help Vermonters, the Democrat Majority in Montpelier has thrown up their hands and decided there is nothing more they can do for their constituents.”

“Legislative leadership is attempting to cast blame at Governor Scott and Legislative Republicans for not offering ‘solutions’ to the property tax crisis,” added Rep. Pattie McCoy (R-Poultney). “Let me be clear: while the responsibility for rising property taxes rests squarely upon the shoulders of the Democrat supermajority, countless solutions have been advanced over the past several years by our side of the aisle–each one of which has been rejected. A list of just some of these rejected solutions that have been presented in current and previous sessions since 2017 is included below.”

“This crisis was entirely avoidable–it didn’t have to be this way,” noted Senate Assistant Minority Leader Brian Collamore (R-Rutland). “In fact, even earlier this year, the House Ways and Means Committee gave bipartisan consideration to meaningful cost containment proposals–only for such ideas to be abandoned by the Democrat supermajority once the unions voiced their opposition.”

“Instead of rolling up their sleeves, the supermajority seems intent on doubling down on the failed policies of the past,” concluded Rep. Casey Toof (R-St. Albans). “Unfortunately, everyday Vermonters–from farmers in Ferrisburgh to single moms in Sunderland will bear the consequences of these massive tax increases. They deserve better, which is why Gov. Scott’s veto should be sustained and Legislative Leadership should come to the negotiating table with the Governor and Republicans in both chambers.”

Cost containment ideas proposed by the Scott administration and Republican legislators over the past several years include, among other proposals, the following:

  • Enacting variable growth caps on per pupil spending (see here);
  • Tying school spending to student population changes (see here);
  • Capping statewide property tax increases (see here);
  • Adjusting excess spending thresholds (see here and here);
  • Meaningfully reducing excessive property tax adjustments (see here and here);
  • Asset testing the income sensitivity program for certain earners (see here);
  • Making the universal meals program progressive (see here and here);
  • Aligning student-to-staff ratios to be more in-line with peer states through natural attrition (see herehere, and here);
  • Implementing a multi-vote structure for districts with lower student-to-staff ratios (see here);
  • Setting clear statutory boundaries on health care cost sharing (see herehere, and here);
  • Adjusting the funding formula to tighten the connection between spending and taxing decisions (see here and here);
  • Strategically utilizing reserves to soften rate increases (see here and here); 

Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 replies »

  1. That what happens when we elect latte sipping trust funders who have bottomless pockets whose only main concerns are climate BS, DEI, LGBQT+(now referred to as alphabet), there ya have it!

  2. i just can not wait to get my eight property tax bills/// i will take my federal funds from my social security and just transfer it to the state of vermont/////

  3. Yahoo Finance June 11, 2024: “Bond giant PIMCO sees another wave of bank failures coming as commercial mortgage trouble mounts. The real wave of distress is just starting” for commercial property debt, Pimco’s John Murray told Bloomberg.
    He warned that bank failures could jump amid high exposure to commercial property loans. Bigger banks and non-bank debt funds should also be areas to watch.
    A “very high” concentration of distressed commercial real estate loans will be drive another spate of bank failures, Pimco’s global head of real estate, John Murray, told Bloomberg.

    Whistling past the graveyard? Too little, too late? What’s in their wallet or portfolios? What liquidity/credit crisis? The rug pull is ready and set to go. What the Vermont legislature is doing pales to what the Treasury/Central banks have in store for everyone shortly. Remember, global finanical boats tied together – (while some are bailing out and untethering in haste, i.e Saudi Arabia.) 2008+++.

  4. Isn’t it interesting that we taxpayers are given only two choices (as we sometimes offer our children when they argue with us)? In this case it’s a choice (a false dichotomy) between a single-digit increase in property tax vs. a double-digit increase. But the word in those ‘choices’ that never changes is ‘increase’.

    Has no one heard of the ‘takings clause’ in the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution? Or the ‘Property Deprivations and Due Process’ protections in the 14th Amendment. What about Articles 1 and 2 of the Vermont Constitution?

    There is no debate that both constitutions include provisions for the public use of private property. However, in all cases, ‘the State’ is required to provide ‘just compensation’ and ‘an equivalent in money’ for the taking of that property … even ‘when the government restricts a person’s use of their property to the point of it constituting a taking.’

    What compensation do taxpayers receive when ‘the State’ takes a taxpayer’s property to sustain its education programs? Half of its students aren’t being ‘proficiently’ educated, even by the standards set forth by ‘the State’. Or is the education system merely a ‘day-care’ or ‘make-work’ scheme?

    No matter how it’s assessed, the only people receiving ‘just compensation’ for their property taxes are the employees and subcontractors providing education ‘services’. But the value of those ‘services’ is not remotely equivalent to what the State is taking.

    Vermont’s Statewide Education Property Tax, as it’s currently being assessed, is unconstitutional. Period.