Commentary

McGuinness: Proposed constitutional amendment expands protections for limited groups

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Renee McGuinness, Policy Analyst for Vermont Family Alliance

Are you aware of the proposed constitutional amendment that appears to provide equal rights to a finite list of groups, upon which you will likely be voting in November?

Vermont legislators are in the process of reviewing Proposal 4 “Equality of Rights” constitutional amendment, which will likely be put before the voters in November 2026, according to the Section 72, Chapter II amendment process of the Vermont Constitution, found here. Prop 4 states equal treatment under the law cannot be denied on account of a person’s, “race, ethnicity, sex, religion, disability, sexual orientationgender identitygender expression, or national origin.” (emphasis added)

While the language of the proposal appears innocuous by offering equal protections, the intent is to pass laws under Prop 4 that will expand rights for the finite list of “historically marginalized groups,” at the expense of other groups. Proposal 4:

  • Will likely create a constitutional right to transgender affirming “care,” including for minors.
  •  Will trample on parental rights, with no parental consent or notification requirements (language of “person’s” likely includes minors as age is not referenced).
  • Allow biological men identifying as women the “right” to access to female-only private spaces and female-only public accommodations, including bathrooms, locker rooms, women’s shelters, and more.  
  • Could give LGBTQ-identifying individuals IVF and surrogacy “rights,” which would commercialize women’s reproduction capabilities and provide health insurance coverage for both the rental of women’s wombs, male sperm, and the buying and selling of the unborn.  
  • Will further enshrine same-sex marriage in the Vermont Constitution.
  • Could give state constitutional rights to individuals who are not citizens of the United States.  

For the full text of Proposal 4, see here.
 
Prop 4 went through its first legislative review and vote in 2024. During this legislative session:

  • Constitutional Law Professor Peter Teachout recommended broader language to avoid interpretive confusion in the courts to both Senate and House Judiciary Committees, which was rejected.  
  • Teachout warned against introducing laws under Prop 4 that would implement affirmative action programs for the finite list of groups, which would violate the 14th Amendment under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.  
  • There was a lack of dissemination to the public regarding Prop 4.  
  • There were more legislators than the public in attendance at the first Public Hearing for Prop 4 on May 1, 2024, found here.

Regardless of Teachout’s warnings in 2024, Prop 4 passed unanimously in the Senate and nearly unanimously in the House. During the constitutionally-required second round of review in 2026, the majority of legislators appear posed to vote affirmatively to put Prop 4 before the voters this November.
Find out how your Representative voted in 2024, here.

Vermont Family Alliance Policy Analyst Renee McGuinness’ testimony to Senate Judiciary on January 29, 2026, reiterating Teachout’s warnings, poor public hearing turn-out, and lack of disseminating information to the voters can be found here.

Constitutional amendments passed by the legislature cannot be vetoed by the Governor. If passed by the voters, Prop 4 would become Article 23 under Chapter 1 of the Vermont Constitution. Prop 4 has, to date, been poorly vetted by our legislators. The only constitutional requirement for disseminating information to the public is a public proclamation issued by the Governor if the legislature votes to put Prop 4 before the voters this November.

Ask your legislators about Prop 4 “Equality of Rights” constitutional amendment by phone or email, or at your Town Meeting. Ask them why you have not received information from them about this important proposed constitutional amendment, and ask them to vote “no” on Prop 4 if the intent is to pass laws that elevate one group’s rights over another. Find your legislators here.

“It is important to remember we are considering the adoption of a constitutional amendment, a fundamental statement of governance that is supposed to guide us over the long term, so while we are doing it, it is important to try to get it right.” – Peter Teachout, Professor of Law, Vermont Law School, to the House Committee on Judiciary on May 1, 2024.


Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: Commentary

4 replies »

  1. national origin……great catch, it means exactly what you are saying……an open door for Vermont to be flooded with people from other nations. And to think they were worried about the environmental toll on our physical land.

    Great article.

    This should be in constant discussion, every day, every week, to inform all the people of our fine state the true intent of this aberration.

    The constitution protects the smallest group of people, the individual, it needs not be changed. And while we are on it, it also protects the smallest person, though many are caught in their self-centeredness to recognize properly what any 3-4 year old can easily identify.

    We need to change our direction, thankfully it’s as easy as that, we have man made created problems, which are easily remedied, by our own change.

    TGBTG

  2. Bone to pick, you can call all the people in Montpelier, and it won’t make a difference for two reasons.

    1) They don’t care and don’t work for you.
    2) The vote will be by the public.

    The public has been brainwashed and uninformed, lied to about what this bill is truly about. This will be the heavy lifting. People need to be discussing this on a regular, daily, hourly basis on line, etc and in person.

    Vermont has a completely controlled press, so it will be tough.

    Long term, it won’t matter. Jesus is in control,

    However, their lies will be more apparent when implemented.

    This was sold/done to prevent people from denying people the right to have an abortion, which is where it gets interesting, so if they are just removing (POC) product of conception, it’s not a baby, then the state, the father, the hospitals are not responsible for a product of conception, but only it’s removal.

    This will be the ruling that make Vermont the state that makes abortion illegal in the country, because….it’s a baby.

    This is how God works; he will not be mocked.

    TGBTG

  3. Thank you Renee, for getting the word out about this. If this Constitutional amendment could be voted on in November, Vermonters need to be informed, discussing and writing about Proposal. 4. This could have a huge impact. Legislators, editors, and concerned citizens – time to engage with pen and voice.

All topics and opinions welcome! No mocking or personal criticism of other commenters. No profanity, explicitly racist or sexist language allowed. Real, full names are now required. All comments without real full names will be unapproved or trashed.