|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Mahdawi (counterclockwise from top) in arrest Monday, speaking on campus, and in his biographical sketch for the Columbia University Buddhist Association. Photo credits in story below.
An earlier version of this story published a photo from Mahdawi’s social media page of Mahdawi’s cousin holding a firearm, and incorrectly stated the person in the photo was Mahdawi.
By Guy Page
Based on comments by elected officials and a slew of social media comments, what Vermonters think about Mohsen Mahdawi’s arrest seems highly influenced by what they think about Israel, Hamas and Donald Trump.
The important question that no-one is asking, much less coherently answering: under what circumstances may the U.S. government legally arrest and deport an immigrant with permanent resident ‘green card’ status? Are we, as Senate Pro Tem Phil Baruth said at a Tuesday press conference, in a terrifying new age of federal fascist authoritarianism? Or is the federal government appropriately enforcing the law?
In a column posted this week, David Soulia of FYI.VT helpfully outlines the federal law addressing deportation of green card holders. In particular he cites 8 U.S. Code § 1227 – Deportable aliens (under ‘security and other grounds, section C): which allows deportation of [presumably otherwise legal] presence and activities that would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences”:
“An alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable.”
And in the same law, deportation is allowed for violations of religious freedom: for ‘commission of severe violations of religious freedom, any alien ….is deportable.”
A green card may be revoked if it is determined, later, than the applicant provided fraudulent information on the application. Did Mahdawi misstate his reason for coming to the United States in 2014? At least one of VDC’s sources with connections to federal authorities claims they believe Mahdawi provided fraudulent information. Unless/until the feds release their arrest report in federal court, there’s no way of knowing.
Has Mohsen Mahdawi said or done anything deportable under this federal law? Read on and make up your own mind.
First, it must be acknowledged that Mahdawi has apparently been a ‘good citizen’ as a part-time resident in Vermont. The owner of a camp in West Fairlee, he has been active in the effort to build homeless housing in Windsor County, according to other homeless advocates. He is said to be a peace-loving bridgebuilder type in his Green Mountain State public persona.
He also is not an Islamic activist, at least not in the traditional understanding of the term. He is, or at least was at one time, a Buddhist, as shown on a Columbia University Buddhist Association website, where he listed as Mohsen Mahdawi, Visionary Advisor: “Mohsen Mahdawi discovered Buddhism shortly after moving to the United States in 2014, finding inner peace through meditation. This practice became a means for him to find solace and healing from the childhood trauma and loss he experienced under Israeli occupation in the refugee camp where he was born and raised in Palestine. Through meditation, Mohsen cultivated empathy and compassion, which fueled his passion for peacemaking and justice.”
And then, there is his Columbia University activism, and other words and actions that could be construed as a basis for federal action by any administration, not just Trump’s.
All before Donald Trump was elected, federal, city and university authorities were condemning anti-semitic statements, threats and violence at Columbia University, where Mahdawi was the leader of an umbrella group of 80 pro-Palestinian activist groups.
His high-level involvement at Columbia was known per this December, 2023 CBS 60 Minutes report and other news sources: “Mohsen Mahdawi is co-president of Columbia’s Palestinian Students Union. When the SJP and another group, Jewish Voice for Peace, were suspended last month – Mahdawi stepped up to lead a diverse, growing coalition of more than 80 campus groups.”
When Mahdawi appeared on 60 Minutes, Host Bill Whitaker asked him about his first thought upon seeing footage of the Hamas October 7 attack on Israel that resulted in the deaths of more than 1100 civilians. It was a golden opportunity to distance himself from the horrific violence perpetrated by Hamas. Yet Mahdawi said nothing at all about the attack itself – only that he was concerned about the Israeli “revenge” counterattack. During the same interview, he expressed ‘empathy’ for Hamas, while stopping just short of explicitly justifying the attack.
As reported already by VDC, he also has posted photos of himself holding a high-powered semi-auto rifle. He told Whitaker that he vowed revenge on Israel as a 10 year old West Bank native, holding the body of a friend shot by an Israeli soldier. Two decades later Mahdawi is seen, megaphone in hand, telling a college crowd that “there is nothing, nothing more honorable than dying for a noble cause, for freedom, for humanity, and for justice.”
But words, no matter how provocative, are one thing, and deeds are another. What, specifically, did Mahdawi do as a Columbia student activist leader, beyond saying provocative things? That depends on the extent that Mahdawi is responsible for the actions of the people he purportedly led.
Their alleged anti-semitic acts included shoving, name-calling, banging on dorm rooms at night and other activities that led Jewish students to feel particularly unsafe at the hands of the Palestinian activists.
In February 2024, Congress opened an investigation into the allegations of widespread antisemitism at Columbia University.
In April 2024, Columbia University President Minouche Shafik condemned antisemitic acts by students and faculty in campus and said the university was in a “moral crisis”. United States president Joe Biden and New York City mayor Eric Adams condemned the 2024 anti-Israel protests as antisemitic and condemned the calls for violence and harassment against Jews.
In August 2024, following months of pressure from several prominent members of Congress, President Shafik resigned and was succeeded by Katrina Armstrong as interim President. Later in August, the university’s antisemitism task force reported that the university had failed to prevent violence and hate or protect Jews in the university.
What about those masked police?
Part of the anti-Trump narrative surrounding April 14 Mahdawi’s arrest involves the apparel and vehicular choices of the police officers. They are said by some elected Vermont officials to be wearing masks, no insignia, ‘bags over their heads,’ and driving unmarked vehicles.
I wasn’t there. I haven’t seen all of the footage. But the most oft-seen photo of the arrest shows Mahdawi strolling along, flashing a peace sign with hands cuffed in front. A nearby police officer is wearing a hooded windbreaker. Most of his face is visible. His parka says Police. (True, he is wearing out-of-uniform jeans.)
For the record, the temps were between 50-60 degrees, with winds at about 5 MPH.
The rest of the footage shows officers putting Mahdawi into the back of an apparently unmarked sedan. In that footage, their faces are more covered with their parka hoods.
This CBS segment credits video footage to Christopher Helali, a Vershire resident who was the 2020 Communist Party candidate for the U.S. House, was on an FBI watch list for fighting in the middle east (against ISIS, Helali says).
Some online comments say the federal cops are hiding their features to protect their identities from retaliation by domestic terror groups using facial recognition software. Like so much other speculation about the Mahdawi case, the answer is – “Could be.”
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Federal Court Action, News Analysis
Really good propaganda only tells the truth. However, it does not tell the whole truth and uses truth to portray things that are not true. This is why it used to be you will tel the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
Case in point.
PRESS SAYS: Candidate Joey, is criminal and no sane person would ever have Joey represent them in office. Candidate Joey has had many, many altercations with police.
THE WHOLE TRUTH: Candidate Joey has been pulled over by the cop’s multiple times over his life, for speeding. A total of 10 times over 40 years. Candidate Joey had the police come to a place he was renting with others because of noise complaints on a party, Joey was 23 years old and not in charge of the residence.
Often when reading the news or listening to NPR, people will say how did the Jury get the verdict so wrong, every time this comes up? Well, you don’t have all the facts and chances are it was never reported. Truth was told, but not the whole truth.
In Hong Kong, the people can tell what he true motives of the government are, by what they censor, same is true in Vermont.
Friends don’t let friends drink too much propaganda.
When people become propaintoxicated, they often become unreasonable, angry and do things they normally wouldn’t do.
We have way too much propaganda in Vermont.
Razors Edge, hogwash. I use my real name here, BTW. As an attorney, I submit that we simply don’t have all the evidence, either way. The feds may have private texts, emails or social media DMs that implicate him in advocacy that is over the line. Perhaps they have witness statements from Jewish victims of violence or intimidation who allege he was directly or indirectly involved. Neither Phil Scott nor some deluded dull razor should be jumping to conclusions or demands of federal authorities. That is what courts are for. And no, you don’t have the same level of free speech rights as a green card holder as do US citizens, for obvious, logical reasons.
Green cards are an extraordinary privilege. If that privilege is abused, building a homeless shelter is no shield: It is a “cover” or subterfuge. Mobsters give out free turkeys while murdering people: they don’t go to jail for the turkeys….. I was worried about free speech for good reason under tyrant Biden — misinformation, disinformation, canceling, calling the opposition party domestic terrorists, using the FBI to spy on Catholics, etc., etc. Now we have an actual possible domestic terrorist, and dull razors zealously defend a rape/murder apologist when they never said boo about Biden attacking people who questioned vaccines that clearly did not work as advertised. No credibility on the America-hating left.
As an administrative law judge and Ian professor I think I agree with your thoughts but I also elieve he has legitimate due process rights including the right to present evidence on his behalf. So far he hasn’t had that opportunity. That is troubling even if the trier of fact finds against him
Mr. Burke, please explain how this individual, Mohsen Mahdawi, is not receiving “due process” rights?
And how do you come to know these particulars?
An invited guest in our home has disrespected our hospitality and now has been asked to leave. Green card or visa holders are very aware of the limits on their behavior while here and must accept this when they come to our country. The public doesn’t have the information available to the authorities, but we must allow the process to go forward with the understanding that no foreigners have a right to enter or stay in America.
I keep reading/hearing (not seeing, yet) that the officers involved were wearing masks. If the officers were undercover officers, not wearing masks, or not having your image blurred could get you killed, or at least blow your cover. As far as using “unmarked” vehicles, go to any city, or state police parking lot, you will see “unmarked” cruisers, big deal……. Maybe they should show up in clown cars with Weird Al Yankovic’s music blaring ? Come on, do these people even listen to what they propose ?
Schizophrenia. The art of confusing the subject matter will turn people off and they will not trust any comments. A twisted view of the real world. Schizophrenia. Webster Dictionary.
You should check your sources very closely for accuracy before posting untrue garbage like, “As reported already by VDC, he also has posted photos of himself holding a high-powered semi-auto rifle.” Funny how no other media has been posting the same pic. I wouldn’t pay a penny for this type of reporting.
How Ironic is it that three of the most anti gun politicians in the history of Vermont are defending a man who is photographed holding a high powered “assault rifle” with what appears to be a 30 round magazine? A magazine that is illegal to purchase in Vermont because of a blll signed into law by Governor Phil Scott who is also no friend of the Second Amendment, Article 16 of the Vermont Constitution and is on record defending Mr. Mahdawi.
AMEN! My thoughts exactly. Meanwhile it’s absolute crickets from the the gun hating, gun restricting, anti constitutional leftists under the dome!!!
Just your typical hypocrisy. Scott is a trader to the Republican Party right along with the newly elected lieutenant governor. They do everything they can to take away our rights ; while giving everything and everyone a pass that they to use for their agenda.
Seems like the same people that are saying he has free speech are the same ones denying free speech to conservatives
Gone are the days when we watched Clinton and Reno try to deal with Elian Gonzales.
It is hard to respond to an article that aims to create doubts about someone’s innocence by insinuation rather than evidence of guilt. However, for starters, it should be pointed out that the man depicted in the opening montage holding a rifle is not Mohsen Mahdawi. But more to the point, the above article seems to suggest that there is ambiguity where there is none. First Amendment rights to freedom of speech is not limited to citizens. It applies to “people”. This is not open to debate, it is established. Nor is our constitutional right to Freedom of Speech limited to speech that does not criticize or protest acts of the US government. Rather it is specifically there to protect a person’s right to protest acts of the US Government. To violate that right is to break the law. So when Donald Trump said “Any student that protests, throw them out of the country, you know, there are a lot of foreign students. As soon as they hear that, they are going to have to behave.” he is threatening to undermine fundamental American freedoms. When he actually acts on that threat, as he is doing in Mohsen Mahdawi’s case, he is breaking the law. And if the courts are not able to stand up to this attack, then we have a Constitutional crisis.
From what I’ve found is green cards are usually valid for 10 years, and that he first came to the U.S. in 2014. Thus, he is already a year overdue on renewing the card. It also depends on if it is a permanent card or a conditional card, which valid for only two years. So technically it appears the government is well within it’s rights to seek deportation. One could also reasonably assume if someone were interested in being a U.S. citizen they would be able to pass the Naturalization test within that 11-year span.