|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
by Robert Fireovid
At this point, you all probably have seen this message that Democrats rolled out yesterday…
Did the Democrats hatch this plan before yesterday’s altercation?
Since I was at the altercation, you need to hear a few things about what actually happened…
- The leader of the protesters brought in and used a microphone with a speaker/amplifier to take control of the room BEFORE the lawful assemblers even started. This person needs to be identified and investigated.
- The lawful assemblers exercised great restraint and did not physically interfere in any way with the protestors.
- After the altercation started, the Sergeant-at-Arms, Agatha Kessler, addressed everyone in the room (to tell them that they all had to vacate the room) and said this first… “Unfortunately, but maybe fortunately…” What on Earth did she mean by that?
- The leader of the protestors was grinning ear-to-ear when the Sergeant-at-Arms said that she was kicking everyone, including those who were lawful assemblers, out of the room. She had successfully shut down a lawful assembly. And it appears that the Sergeant-at-Arms was complicit in protestors’ effort to shut down a lawful assembly.
- The Democrats are lying. The lawful assemblers had no plans to say anything against people who identify as transgender. Rather, they were going to hear from people who formerly identified as transgenders, but later found that doing so hurt them (https://vermontdailychronicle.com/detrans-awareness-day-event-organizer-explains-what-trans-disrupters-prevented-her-from-saying/).
The protestors violated Vermont statute…
Title 13 : Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter 019 : Breach of the Peace; Disturbances
Subchapter 004 : OTHER DISTURBANCES OF THE PEACE
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 1026)
- § 1026. Disorderly conduct
(a) A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if he or she, with intent to cause public inconvenience or annoyance, or recklessly creates a risk thereof:
(1) engages in fighting or in violent, tumultuous, or threatening behavior;
(2) makes unreasonable noise;
(3) in a public place, uses abusive or obscene language;
(4) without lawful authority, disturbs any lawful assembly or meeting of persons; or
(5) obstructs vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
(b) A person who is convicted of disorderly conduct shall be imprisoned for not more than 60 days or fined not more than $500.00, or both. A person who is convicted of a second or subsequent offense under this section shall be imprisoned for not more than 120 days or fined not more than $1,000.00, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 222 (Adj. Sess.), § 5, eff. April 5, 1972; 2013, No. 150 (Adj. Sess.), § 3.)
The Sergeant-at-Arms aided-and-abetted protestors to violate Vermont Statute and possibly Federal Civil Rights Law. She needs to be fired for incompetence and possible criminal conspiracy.
Republican legislators need to blast Democrats for aiding-and-abetting protestors to violate Vermont Statute, to censor lawful free speech in our State House, and to possibly violate Federal Civil Rights Law. The Democrats are complicit in bringing mob rule to our State House.
I think it’s very likely that the Vermont Legislature will be sued by the U.S. Department of Justice for violating citizens’ First Amendment Rights. I hope that you and every Republican legislator will strongly support the Constitutional rights of your constituents.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: Commentary












Thank you Robert for speaking truth despite the fact that we have a government in Vermont that is blinded to it. There is hope for a return to what our nation was founded as – in the words of Abe Lincoln: “A government of the people, by the people and for the people” and that includes all viewpoints. This was evident in the November 2024 election mandate for a return to decency and common sense!
Could we have expected anything but such purposeful civil disobedience? These miscreants are out of touch with reality and decency.
I am surprised that their tirade did not include a slew of “F-Bombs”. This now seems to be the operative word used by DEMS/PROGS in any speech, legislative meeting, protesting and where ever they can add it to destroy decorum. I never thought I would hear our congressional representative using such language or our senior senator slipping it in wherever he can. Interestingly, the other day a DEM in Washington said that using the “F-Bomb” made them more relatable to American voters.
They don’t care if elderly women, children, clergy, etc. are in the audience, and they couldn’t care less as THEY see themselves as the power brokers. They think that they have a right to shake up, and supposedly provide a “bolt out of the blue” proffer, to get attention, even if it is distasteful and low class, which they themselves have become.
This is right out of George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm where “some animals are more equal than others”. The phrase is a paradoxical statement which is used to criticize the hypocrisy and corruption of the pigs, (progressives) who take over the farm, (Vermont). It shows how leaders in power like Lori Houghton, Kesha Ram Hinsdale and Jill Krowinski can manipulate language to create a false sense of equality while perpetuating inequality and oppression.
The problem we have in this State – the laws are clear and law enforcement simply shrugs and ignores. I suppose it is because they are compensated (above the table and below the table) to do so. Many are lawyers which gives them the skill and license to weave, dodge and raise objections to gaslight the populace. If there was a legitimate, uncorrupted prosecutor, ethical judge, and non-woke mentally sane leadership, there would be civility, actual equal justice, and order in this State. There is none currently and that is by their choice – it should be clear our choice is to remove each and every one off their perches of fake power and fake authority. Until then, we are subjected to lawlessness, grifting grifters, drug addicts, free ranging mental patients, and willful ignorance of the law.
As a side note: If there is a starving attorney looking for a decent contingency case – why not go after the offenders causing the civil tort? “A civil tort is a civil wrong, other than a breach of contract, that causes harm or loss to another, resulting in legal liability for the person who committed the tortious act, and is typically remedied through monetary damages.”
If the evidence is clear an invidual caused harm to others, caused a loss, violated protected civil rights – why not file a claim or civil lawsuit? Lawfare warfare is what they throw at every one else – maybe it’s time to return the disfavor?
Amen to all of the above. There is a courtroom where justice truly prevails. And I pray, all of you take these matters to the court room of heaven with your prayers, too. God is in control and we need to fill His courtroom with our cries for justice. He hears, but He awaits hearing from more of us. Will Vermont truly unite on the National Day of Prayer on May 1, to make these matters ones we cry out about? Make plans now to gather in your community to PRAY, May 1 and routinely before then, too.
Where is a denunciation from our Vermont Republicans?