|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Secretary Kristi Noem February 18 announced a nationwide and international multimillion-dollar ad campaign warning illegal aliens to leave our country now or face deportation with the inability to return to the United States. The international ads warn criminal illegal aliens not to come to America and break its laws or they will be hunted down and deported.
This series of ads will run on radio, broadcast, and digital, in multiple countries and regions in various dialects. Ads will be hyper-targeted, including through social media, text message and digital to reach illegal immigrants in the interior of the United States, as well as internationally.
“Thank you, President Donald J. Trump, for securing our border and putting America first. President Trump has a clear message: if you are here illegally, we will find you and deport you. You will never return. But if you leave now, you may have an opportunity to return and enjoy our freedom and live the American Dream,” said Secretary Kristi Noem. “If you are a criminal alien considering entering America illegally: Don’t even think about it. If you come here and break our laws, we will hunt you down. Criminals are not welcome in the United States.”
Watch domestic ad here and international ad here.
Discover more from Vermont Daily Chronicle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
With regard to Vermont’s Sanctuary Immigration Policy: Are we all Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing… peering into the deepest reaches of our individual and collective psyche?
“Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster… for when you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.” ― Friedrich W. Nietzsche
Vermont’s immigration policies fall somewhere between the emulation of God’s love and compassion, and the malicious empathy that also resides in everyone’s soul, depending, of course, upon with whom one is speaking. It’s the Yin and the Yang. A Binary Continuum. Relativity. Put another way, is it better to give a man a fish and feed him for a day, teach a man to fish and feed him for a lifetime, or, as with all of life’s deliberations, to strike a unique balance, again, depending upon with whom one is speaking?
One thing is certain. As with education and all of the other so-called social services emulating from the collective consensus, or from one’s individual principles, one size never, ever, fits all. Never every person. Never every occasion.
The Governor of Plymouth Plantation characterized this certainty in 1623 as ‘that conceit of Plato’s… that the taking away of property and bringing in community into a commonwealth would make them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God.” William Bradford was the first person to express this sentiment in writing, fully 164 years before the U.S. Constitution was ratified. And America’s Founders understood this dichotomy 250 years ago as well, when, for the first time, the colonists created a social governance specifically intended and designed to cope with this duality.
In other words, conflict is inevitable. Without conflict, peace is irrelevant. Finding the middle ground is the spice of life.
The dark side of compassion is empathy, rooted in manipulation – manipulating or controlling others for personal gain. It can come from an acquaintance, a politician, a co-worker, a friend, a spouse, …even a child. And it certainly can come from an enemy. An axiomatic ‘PsyOp’. We all do it to one degree or another.
There are more than 8 billion people living on planet Earth. And it appears today that about one percent of them would like to come to the United States for its unique opportunities, such as they still are. That’s 80 million additional people who ultimately must be identified, supported, and assimilated into the American society.
But identified, supported, and assimilated how, and by whom?
Despite what anyone says, as certain as it is that the sun will rise tomorrow morning, I for one am not capable of pulling that off. Nothing that I can newly propose, or have, or can do, will achieve that goal. And I haven’t met anyone else, or any other group of like-minded people, who have convinced me that they can pull this off either. Sorry. I don’t believe you. But I do, still, respect the U.S. Constitution.
We all have the same natural tendencies that include the balance between two fundamental principles, one negative, dark, passive, and cold. The other, positive, bright, active, and hot. The interactions and balance of these forces in nature influence our behavior and fate.
What we have is a continuing ‘Question of Balance’.
“It’s not the way that you say it, when you do those things to me.
It’s more the way that you mean it, when you tell me what will be.
And when you stop and think about it, you won’t believe it’s true.
That all the love you’ve been giving – has all been meant for you.” ― Justin Hayward
“Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t mean to do harm; but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.” ― T.S. Eliot
The United States, arguably, has the most reasonable immigration laws in the world… if we would only follow them. Try immigrating to Davos, Switzerland, where the world’s elite gather every year to formulate a plan for the rest of us to live by. But will they accept responsibility for improving the lives of the 80 million people who want to come to America? Would you buy the Brooklyn Bridge from them? Will you buy that same bridge from your neighbor?
Perfect,hopefully they get the message, it’s pretty simple follow our laws, remember the leftist speel ” No one is above the law ” and yes that includes the immigration laws.
Are our immigration laws broken ??, probably, but we have plenty of government employees that are sitting on there hands and can be used elsewhere, like the 82,000
IRS stiffs Biden wanted, yeah like there needed, you as a taxpaying citizen need to be audited, but not the Federal Government ????…………… sure, they are all honest !!
These border jumpers broke the law and they all need to be deported, leave now is good advise………..IF you can be vetted, well welcome to the USA !!!
Wake up people.
Ephesians 6:12 – For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Signs and warnings abound – last call ringing out. If one happens to be on the wrong side….oh well…free will and the consequences do manifest regardless.
A perfect challenge to Illegal Aliens currently in the U.S. Their fate, leave on your own and apply to Imagination (like all the other Aliens who came legally, many who are now U.S. citizens) or sooner or later be found, and be exiled from ever returning to the U.S. Deportation and blacklisted by Imagination because you are guilty of breaking a Federal crime against the U.S.
We should have the same warning on every sign entering Vermont for our Drug Dealers…….
Instead of quaint it’s snowing, bundle up…. Deal Drugs in Vermont, Hard Prison labor in a foreign country.
If we made drug dealing as difficult as starting a business, we’d have zero overdoses and addicted births happening in this state.
Make any drug dealer have to get an Act 250 permit, that will stop it!
Act 250 permit…now there is good out of the box thinking.
This repatriating of people just walking into our house without an invitation could be one of the most significant events in a long time.
Any country is free to become like the United States, we should be sending all the people who entered the incorrect way a copy of the constitution and a bible on their way back home. It would be much like when all the early Christians were persecuted, it will spread the foundation of our country to other parts of the world. People from foreign lands will have seen what was created and witness firsthand, knowing it was true and what were the building blocks of a solid nation. This could be the most important event, well the second most important event in human history.
I am an American. And I approve this message.
I keep coming back to the example of a sinking cruise ship, and everyone is in the water. You and your family have made it into one of the few lifeboats, with a capacity of 50 people, and the lifeboat is half full.
What would you do about the hundreds left in the water? Do you pick up everyone you can, swamp the boat, and everyone perish? Or do you take people of value, such as the navigator, the doctor, the young deckhand with a strong back? Do you take the guy with an infectious disease? Do you improve your odds of survival, or do you take anyone whether they are useful or not?
And do you give up your own seat to provide a space for someone else?
There are no “right” answers here; only hard choices that must be made.
That is immigration in a nutshell.
Just so you know this is one of the trick questions they use to push Marxism. How cold is the water? If it’s titanic, then it’s already answered for you, there is nothing anyone can do. There are many scenarios of how this could go other than what you suggest. What is being suggested in this question is not how mankind has survived. We are not elevated for being better survivalists, quite the contrary. America is not great because we are more powerful and cunning. It is by grace, it is by submission to one in control. What is the greatest thing one can do for fellow mankind?
Interesting question.
“It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest.’ – – A. Smith
“If an exchange between two parties is voluntary, it won’t take place unless both believe they will benefit from it.” – – M. Friedman
When two people find themselves in a boat that can serve only one of them, their choices are infinite, and I will be the last person to second guess them, having not been a party to their final agreement. The best thing I can do is learn from their experience and, if I deem it prudent, avoid a similar circumstance.
Godspeed.
Postscript: A Marxist (anyone advocating for a ‘collective’ of property and thought) prefers the ‘collective’, for two reasons. First: they fear their personal inability to cope with life on earth, to make agreements with others on voluntary terms and hold themselves accountable for their actions. Or second: they recognize the ‘collective’ as the great watering hole where they can stalk their prey AND avoid accountability under the false precept that ‘we’re all in this together’.
“If I knew for a certainty that a man was coming to my house with the conscious design of doing me good, I should run for my life,” – Henry David Thoreau
“In pondering Thoreau’s perspective, it becomes evident that the quote serves as a cautionary reminder to critically evaluate both our own intentions and the intentions of others. It underscores the complexity of human nature and the sometimes-unpredictable consequences that even well-intentioned actions can yield.” – – The Socratic Method
Keep up the Great fight and hard work Donald J Trump Get-R-Done and Crew Get-R-Done 👍🇺🇸 🗽🇺🇸👍Get-R-Done Patriots Get-R-Done 🇺🇸
Fun Fact: Some public libraries block this video on their computers as RESTRICTED. Shocker.
The Secretary’s statement stands boldly in contrast to the two-word message conveyed by the last administration’s “border czar” Kamala: “dont come”…