Site icon Vermont Daily Chronicle

Thayer: Hard look at the Vermont House and Senate

By Gregory Thayer

Now that I have announced my candidacy for lieutenant governor as a Republican for Vermont, I have many questions for the current leadership of our legislature. We need to learn from those missteps from this session and the past. We need to do a better job for the future of our great state for our children and our children’s children.

I believe that many of the people serving in this legislature are not representing you and your family.

Greg Thayer

I’ve heard many time around the state, “What are they doing?” They are growing government to a level that government is going to control every movement of “We The People”. We are drowning us in statutes, regulations, and government control! This must stop now.

These people are piling laws on top on laws. Our Vermont Statutes Annotated (VSA) have grown substantially in the past 15 to 20 years. This practice must stop.

Case in point: Take the right to bear/carry arms bill approved by the Senate and House. S-30 and is supposedly about no guns in hospitals. We have state statutes to remedy this if there is a problem. We have trespassing laws that work. Plus, there are federal laws that can be used. S-30 is not needed; it’s simple overreaching.


Why are our state legislators working practically full time? Let’s look at two states, our small Vermont and the huge state of Texas. Texas is massive; 29 million people call the Lone Star state home. Its annual budget is $110 billion, the 10th largest economy in the world. It shares over 1,250 miles of border with Mexico. The Texas state legislature meets every two years. That’s right every two years, and only for a maximum of 140 days.


Here, in our beloved Green Mountain state, we have just over 634,000 inhabitants, an annual budget of $7.7 billion (and that is overinflated, thanks to nonprofits) and a whopping 90 mile border with Canada. Our Vermont legislators meet every year, January to June, and then they set up “special” study committees studying their special interest groups’ plan for more legislation during the regular session.


This is a waste of both taxpayer money and time for such a small state.


I understand that is “how it has worked for years.” However, never to this level, this long, and with all these “special” study committees and continuing so late into the year. I remember 20-25 years ago when the state’s annual budget was roughly $650 million. The legislature was only in session mid to late May in an off-election year and maybe until mid April in the election year. Then, they didn’t want to go overboard, costing taxpayers more money, so they’d gavel down the second year of the biennial so they wouldn’t anger voters.


The management of both Houses and Senate in Montpelier must be revamped and discussed with Vermont voters. I believe many of the bills that are introduced are special interest projects. They are overreaching, smothering our citizens, and working to destroy our republic, our Vermont Constitution, and the great everyday people of our state. Many are duplicates that are not needed.


Look at the statutes that are in the VSAs. Are the Progressives working for what is best for the people or towards total control of the people?

The author is a Rutland resident and candidate for Lieutenant Governor. He faces Sen. Joe Benning (Caledonia) in the Republican primary.

Exit mobile version